Editorial

Journalistic ethics and campaign contributions

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Journalists often hear charges that their stories are biased, but if they're doing their job, what the critics are more likely saying is that the story isn't slanted in the direction they would like it to be.

Occasionally, they hear complaints from both sides of an issue, which many writers wear as a badge of honor.

Former Gazette publisher and editor, Allen Strunk, upon hearing a source praise a particular reporter about a story, would later ask a question, half seriously. "OK, what did you leave out?"

Journalism schools and news organizations drill the concept of objectivity into their reporters with the goal of providing fair and accurate reports consumers can count on.

While opinion pages are reserved for opinion, the other pages are ideally used to present both sides of an issue.

News people don't give up their constitutional rights, but they do face certain restrictions when it comes to political activity, including contributions to candidates.

The New York Times ethics handbook prohibits staffers from giving or raising money for political candidates or election causes, to avoid "feeding a false impression that the paper is taking sides."

The Associated Press outright bans journalists from donating money to political organizations or political campaigns.

CNN says it does not allow editorial staff to contribute to campaigns or parties, as do most major newspapers and news organizations.

But few industries have faced as many changes in recent years as the news businesses, and we've never seen a presidential campaign like this one.

Donald Trump has made few friends in the media, banning certain networks from is events, suing the New York Times for libel and demanding a retraction, and promising to change laws to make it easier for public figures to win lawsuits against media that criticize them or cast them in a bad light.

Hillary Clinton has been more subtle in her attempts to control a press less critical to her campaign, but it's hard for working journalists to clear their minds of the image of her handlers literally roping off the press corps that was following her at a parade.

But if their news organizations have policies against contributing to political campaigns, a lot of today's news people didn't get the memo.

According to the Center for Public Integrity, which looked into presidential campaign contributions between Jan. 1, 2015 and Aug. 30, 2016, journalists contributed $14,373 to Donald Trump's campaign, and $381,814 to Hillary Clinton's.

Of a number of journalists contacted for a story republished in Editor & Publisher, several said they had contributed to particular candidates in order to attend important fund-raisers, for example.

Or, they were simply exercising their constitutional rights and it wouldn't affect their reporting.

Two Indiana University-Blooming professors found in 2014 that 28 percent of journalists said they affiliated with the Democratic Party, 7 percent with the Republican and 14 percent an "other" party.

The rest, more than 50 percent, say they're not affiliated with any political party.

For most of the campaign, Trump boasted of self-funding his campaign, which accounts for some of the disparity.

But with journalist contributions running nearly 30-1 in favor of Hillary Clinton, it's hard not to believe they're not putting their money where their hearts are.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • What a Trumped up editorial. Guess we know where your political preferences lay.

    Your statement "Donald Trump has made few friends in the media" is just plain hogwash. How do you account for the nearly 2 billion dollars in what is known as earned media through March of 2016? Have you forgotten all of the times he would call the news media and get free broadcast time?

    Here is an article that compared all of the Presidential Candidates and how much media coverage each candidate bought and how much was considered free. The data was compiled by mediaQuant and published in an article by the New York Times March 15, 2016. Oh, I forgot Mr. Trump didn't like the New York Times did he.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advanta...

    -- Posted by Geezer on Thu, Oct 20, 2016, at 8:07 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: