Letter to the Editor

ID bill will negatively affect 300,000 voters

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Dear Editor,

In response regarding LB 111, I must point out that what seems to be a reasonable way to protect voters' rights, will instead negatively impact around 300,000 voters across Nebraska. LB 111 would require a voter to show a driver's license or state-issued photo ID with current address at the polls. This will cause significant problems for minorities, the elderly, college students and low-income groups found in urban areas, small towns, and rural settings.

For example, a resident in McCook, who moves into a retirement facility there will have to get a new driver's license or state-issued photo ID in order to vote in future elections. A driver's license or photo ID costs $26.50. The person may move only a few miles or even a few blocks, but find himself prevented from voting if he doesn't have the license or photo ID with a current address.

Getting to a DMV office in not easy in 75% of Nebraska counties, with some of them offering DMV services only once a week.

Many students who attend UN-K, for example, want to vote where they live while attending school. To do so would mean obtaining a new driver's license or photo ID, showing that current address. The original intent of the bill is to be among the most restrictive in the nation, and this is exposing serious problems with implementation.

Nebraska Secretary of State John Gale has stated each time that this type of legislation is introduced that Nebraska does NOT have a voter fraud problem. It is virtually non-existent. Secretary Gale estimates it will cost his office (our taxpayer dollars) $300,000 per election cycle to train poll workers and educate voters on the new law if enacted. Providing free photo ID cards for those who qualify under the legislation would result in a revenue loss of $1,000,000 to the state. With much more important problems to be addressed by our state senators, such as prison reform, debating a bill which is a solution in search of a non-existent problem is a gross waste of tax money.

The Constitution of Nebraska guarantees the right to vote without hindrance or impediment. LB 111 mandates the very opposite of that guarantee, is therefore unconstitutional, and should not be enacted into law.

Sherry Miller,

President, League of Women Voters

of Nebraska

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • They probably don't want certain sectors of the population voting because they would tend to vote for the democratic party rather than as republicans. No doubt that is all that is going on. People shouldn't vote republican - so as to discourage these kinds of tactics. We will have to see how the Clinton's can use the republicans dishonest practice to their advantage. They have been speaking out about it for a long time. Both this sort of thing and re districting. I hope it proves more a detriment to the republicans than a benefit to them.

    -- Posted by bob s on Wed, Feb 18, 2015, at 4:17 PM
  • This is an idea whose time has come. We do not need Chicago politics (vote early, vote often) in Nebraska. You need to have a photo id for virtually anything you do anymore. Why is it so wrong to require one to do the most important thing a person can do? For the opportunity to vote I would present any documents they wanted. It is an honor and privilege to vote, one that many many other countries do not have. We need to keep that privilege honest at what ever cost.

    -- Posted by quick13 on Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 11:50 AM
  • I agree with quick13! We need proof of who we are to drive, go on a plane.....heck the Democrats at their last National Convention (I was told since I sure did not attend) required photo ID to enter. Voting should require one also.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 3:18 PM
  • Do we really need to pass another law for something that's not a problem?

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 12:16 PM
  • *

    quick13 said... "It is an honor and privilege to vote..."

    I submit it is neither. Voting is a right guaranteed in our Constitution. It is not, nor should it ever be privileged.

    -- Posted by Brian Hoag on Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 2:24 PM
  • Brian yew it is a right and and no it should never be the only the "privileged" who vote. I was referring to other countries who's population does not enjoy the same "rights" as we do. And compared to other countries it is and honor.

    -- Posted by quick13 on Sun, Feb 22, 2015, at 6:59 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: