Letter to the Editor

Dunces, dunces

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Dear Editor,

There was great ballyhoo and shouts of joy as Pat Quinn, governor of Illinois, (last evening), signed the "marriage equivalent act" for his state, and for future Lesbian and Homosexual voters, and as the governor held the signed document in the air as a sign of conquest for all the Lesbians and Homo-sexuals, the "dunces" below began kissing each other on the mouth in order to make their point that this was a "sexual union," not a "civil union." Meanwhile the King of dunces continued to wave in the air his white signed document from his throne above, urging on the sexual abnormality of the dunces below, as the camera zoomed in on each "mouthed kiss."

"All men are created equal" is the most abused and misunderstood statements handed down to us by our forefathers. and this is why we end up with "chaos" described above. There is an old saying that, opposites attract. And all good marriages can substantiate this. On the other hand, the same cannot be said for lesbian or homosexual; rather there is always something abnormal or unnatural about such a union. Our world is full of diversity and inequality; one of our monetary coins is stamped "e pluribus unum" (from many one).

There is but one way that we are all equal and that is that "'We are all children of God" and our last end is equally the same: we face four things at the end of this life: death, judgment, heaven or hell.

Finally a few words of warning from the great poet, Alexander Pope (1688-1744) -- a few lines from his The Dunciad "Education had become entangled in the pale of words": "scholarship dealt in fragments, not a meal," "criticism expended itself in minutiae, not concerned about how parts relate to parts. or these parts to the whole": "The new sciences, with their slogan, 'I meddle only in my sphere' were taking on the attributes of the narrow objects they pursued": "The new creeds were thrusting "some mechanic cause' into the Creator's place, or abandoning him altogether to 'make God man's image, and man the final Cause": "without a center, activity is only mobility without direction;" "without a One, the many fall apart": without a Word, a Logos, some constant standard of respective values, men are divided, not united, blinded, not illuminated by their private, atomistic un-creating words. (a final caveat to all public, and government figures):

Lo! The dread empire, Chaos! is restored;

Light dies before thy un-creating word:

Thy hand, great Anarch! lets the curtain fall;

And Universal Darkness buries all.

Sincerely,

J.G. McHale

McCook, Nebraska

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • It's becoming such that most Americans are for gay marriage. See this -- http://features.pewforum.org/same-sex-marriage-attitudes/ --- It's a changing world.

    -- Posted by bob s on Wed, Nov 27, 2013, at 5:28 PM
  • Yesterday, I read "Dunces, Dunces" by J.G. McHale.

    I found His (her?) perspective to be so sad, that I just have to respond.

    For clarity, I will list my points out:

    First - Respect for Others:

    Calling those with a different world view from you as "Dunces" is just plain immature and disrespectful. And labeling their well-deserved fight to be treated equally as "chaos"?!!

    Can you tell me a circumstance where this sort of derisive name-calling and labeling was a positive? Is it "Christian" for you to argue important points by bashing others with

    name-calling? Would Jesus advocate this approach?!

    Second - Opposites DO NOT attract:

    I've been married for 25 years. Anybody that has been in any successful long-term relationship KNOWS that opposites DO NOT attract! Rather, it is SAMENESS that is the glue for relationships of all sorts straight OR gay. And this is the pillar of McHale's argument!

    What a shame.

    Third - First-Hand Experience:

    I wonder how many friends J.G. McHale has that aren't straight. Given the hate I read, it is highly likely that this is zero.

    I say this not to stereotype the closed-minded, but instead to point something important out:

    Over the decades, I've become acquaintances and, yes, friends with several gay and lesbian people. They are some of the more outstanding, forthright individuals I know.

    Instead of being sub-human with limited personal freedoms as J.G. McHale advocates, they just seem to try harder at being good to others. Why? Well, I think this is because of the longer, harder life path they have to follow. They are forced in some indirect way to set that good example for others. I see this often.

    Finally - Heterosexual treatment of marriage:

    I know there are so many fears about allowing gays to marry means the destruction of the institution of marriage.

    Well, too late!! Just look at the track record for how heterosexuals have treated marriage! Cheating on one's partner plays out like a game sport on T.V. Over 50% divorce rate. "No-fault" divorces which have made getting a divorce easier than getting a building permit.

    Heterosexuals have largely destroyed the institution of marriage through their selfishness and carelessness. And now, they have the hypocritical audacity to exclude it from honest human beings that are lovingly committed to each other?

    This marginalizing of others reeks of how Nazi Germany treated the Jews ("sub-human")and how our southern whites treated blacks (again, "sub-human")years ago.

    Life is short. There should be no tolerance for this sort of close-minded exclusion of people simply because they are different from you.

    Please. Put yourself in their shoes.

    And, if you have a Christian perspective, take some quite time and consider: What would Jesus have done?

    -- Posted by Deljet on Fri, Nov 29, 2013, at 11:18 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: