Editorial

Work Ethic Camp inmates losers as Chambers wins

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The debate over Sen. Mark Christensen's bill to allow work-camp inmates to work for non-profit groups has been a good introduction of Sen. Ernie Chambers to those who may be new to the state, or those who became politically aware during his term-limited absence from the Unicameral.

Chambers made good his vow to filibuster for as long as necessary to kill LB52, brought to the floor on behalf of McCook area non-profits and other organizations who have enjoyed being part of the rehabilitation process the Work Ethic Camp offers.

Unfortunately, Chambers was able to wear Christensen down to the point the Imperial senator withdrew his bill, and first managed to attach an amendment that bars nonprofit groups from participating if they discriminate based on sexual orientation.

That's essentially a non-issue, but one that gave Chambers his first small victory against the bill and left Christensen scratching his head.

Chambers is at least consistent in his disdain for corrections and law enforcement, and his willingness to do what he thinks is right to stand up for those who are incarcerated or otherwise disadvantaged.

But we wonder if he has ever talked to someone who has worked with WEC offenders, or any of the offenders themselves. In our experience, the offenders appreciate a chance to get away from their prison facility to take part in constructive activities designed to build up self esteem and self confidence.

It turned out that Chambers' ego was the winner in the current legislative battle, and Work Ethic Camp inmates are the losers.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Chambers has done a disservice to the inmates that could have received work experience and to the non-profits in SW Nebraska

    -- Posted by dennis on Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 1:57 PM
  • Not so many years ago inmates were given no choice and had to work. Now its an issue to simply give them the 'option' to work.

    Perhaps if prison were more like prison and less like country clubs they wouldn't be so overcrowded.

    Ernie is a stirrer of pots and pandering to his base, go figure.

    -- Posted by Diatheke on Fri, Mar 1, 2013, at 1:52 PM
  • How can Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona get away with all of his rehabiltation "techniques"? When we cannot even force able bodied inmates to do light work for not for profit organizations? Much less pay for their meals, live in tents, wear pink underware, and work on chain gangs? We need to get a backbone in this state!

    -- Posted by quick13 on Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 4:13 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: