Automatic budget cuts will have local effects

Monday, February 25, 2013

Congress and the White House set up what they hoped would be such a horrendous situation that they couldn't help but reach a budget compromise.

Guess what?

Apparently it wasn't horrendous enough.

It's likely now that"sequestration" will take place Friday, meaning that $85 billion in federal budget cuts will take place automatically from March through September.

Admittedly, $85 billion is a small part of a $3.8 trillion budget, but how many programs will be affected in Nebraska?

Quite a few, according to the White House.

Some examples:

* Nebraska schools would lose nearly $3 million in funding, jeopardizing 40 teaching jobs and help for 5,000 students.

* Education programs for disabled students would lose $3.53 million.

* About 180 fewer low-income students would receive aid for college in Nebraska, and about 150 fewer would get work-study jobs.

* About 400 fewer Nebraska children would be able to participate in Head Start or Early Head Start.

* Spending at Offutt Air Force Base and other Air Force bases would be cut by $15 million in Nebraska.

* Army base spending would be cut by $1.1 million.

* About 4,000 civilian employees of the Defense Department would be furloughed.

* Nebraska would lose nearly $1.3 million in funding for environmental programs.

* Grants for fish and wildlife protection would be cut by $686,000.

* Job search assistance programs would lose $460,000 in Nebraska, so 14,400 fewer people would be helped.

* As many as 200 disadvantaged children could lose child care.

* The vaccine program for children would lose $52,000, so 760 fewer kids would get their shots.

* About $390,000 would be cut from a grant program for substance abuse treatment.

* Nebraska's HIV testing program would lose $51,000.

* The nutrition program for seniors in Nebraska would lose $121,000.

* About $39,000 would be cut from a program that fights domestic violence.

The White House, however, didn't have specific information about state budget structures and how money might be moved around to cover certain programs.

There's still a change Congress will reach a budget deal to avoid the cuts, but if it doesn't, we may have a chance to find out which programs are actually vital and which ones we can do without.

Comments
View 4 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Are you really "losing" a service if you couldn't afford it in the first place and were borrowing money annually to pay for it?

    -- Posted by Bruce Baker on Mon, Feb 25, 2013, at 2:39 PM
  • Only in the federal government is it considered a cut when it is just a reduction in the increase. This was an Obama plan to start with. Yes it wil cause some pain but it is also causing pain to continue to borrow 42 cents of every dollar the feds spend. That pain will be kicked down the road to our children and grandchildren. Bruce is right. Declan should not have to pay for the expenses of this administration.

    -- Posted by dberrynebraska on Mon, Feb 25, 2013, at 3:00 PM
  • Oh those terrible,mean repubs!!! Maybe if we weren't paying for so many vacations,someone could stay home and work on a real budget.I guess it was unpatiotic when Bush spent so much,lol,he should have doubled it like the current administration so it would have been patriotic.

    -- Posted by bigmike95 on Mon, Feb 25, 2013, at 8:23 PM
  • The problem with the sequestration is it is not nearly enough. If we have to borrow 42% of every dollar the government spends, it seems to me we need to cut our spending by at least 43%. To borrow a movie line, I may not be a smart man but...it seems to me 58 dollars income minus 100 dollars in spending equal a recipe for bankruptcy, economic depression, riots, food lines, and a total breakdown of our society. There is no way we could run our businesses, homes, or non-profit organizations the way our government is running (or maybe ruining) our country.

    -- Posted by quick13 on Tue, Feb 26, 2013, at 10:13 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: