Letter to the Editor

Barter system next?

Monday, October 3, 2011

Dear Editor,

Donald Trump's interview with Mitt Romney seemed to go well. I'm sure they discussed our country's debt crisis. Their conversation was not televised. Just the pictures.

If they discussed the future of Social Security, I'm sure Romney would have responded with a statement found on page 58 of his book "No Apology." In it, he says "Social benefits are proportional with what an individual has paid into the system. Congress and the president could raise the Social Security tax rate and apply it to an individual's earnings. This would raise benefits, but compound the problem. We would be saddling the next generation with the very tax burden we are seeking to avoid."

Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska recently answered a letter I wrote to him about Social Security's future.

He states in it that Social Security paid out more benefits than it received in 2010. According to him, Social Security trust funds are estimated to run out in 2036.

His comment about Medicare was very, very discouraging. The new health care law includes nearly $500 billion in cuts in health care benefits. Sen. Johanns also warns that Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are on an unsustainable course.

"The cost of our country's national debt is swallowing up our resources," is an exact quote from the letter.

As a senior citizen, I am very worried about our future. My children and grandchildren probably won't have financial security. They may have to barter for things they need like their pioneer ancestors did.

Helen Ruth Arnold,

Trenton, Nebraska

Comments
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    So....is that good? Or bad?

    -- Posted by Mickel on Mon, Oct 3, 2011, at 8:04 PM
  • Bartering, although currently illegal, is a heck a deal. Illegal because it cuts out the taxation aspect of our trade system, (also, very difficult to both prove not to mention enforce).

    A trade of goods for services or vice-versa is quite lucrative for all involved, except Uncle Sam of course.

    Believe this: before this financial upheaval has seen its last hour, we may well be back to the old barter system as our dollar won't be worth the paper it's printed on.

    This, of course, is just my opinion, based on the opinion of most the financial analysts out there.

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Mon, Oct 3, 2011, at 9:53 PM
  • nick, once again you shock me. yes dr. thanks for the 3 day stay in the hospital, please take tgwo chickens and a cow for payment.

    the barter system didnt work and thats why it is a lost system.

    do you ever preview your comments before you save them?

    -- Posted by BTWinecleff on Wed, Oct 5, 2011, at 5:53 PM
  • (sigh) I don't know why I'm doing this.....

    Whiner,

    If it comes down to the hospital accepting chickens and cows for their payment, we have larger problems than the loss of livestock for trade of medical services. The problem will be that you better be a survivalist if you plan to keep existing. I know that I sound like an alarmist but if you keep up with the world media, you'll note that China has gone from their government buying as much gold bullion as they could, to promoting the private sector to buy gold. This is, by financial speculators, the plan to get the price of gold up and out of the grasp of the average investor's price range so there will be no American reserve, thereby forcing the monetary denomination to switch to the "China Dollar". If America loses the unique position of printing the Dollar (American Dollar) which is currently the world monetary denomination, then we will no longer be able to print our way out of debt to our creditors, and then...... we see debt default.

    Or maybe I'm reading the comics too closely. What do you think Whiner?... or did I lose you at "(sigh)?

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Wed, Oct 5, 2011, at 9:38 PM
  • there were a lot of big words in there nick, i'm not a linguist nor an avid reader of the webster dictionaly or the world news for that matter.

    i suppose you lost me at "sigh". i can't stand to read your blowhard rants. just summerize what your trying to to say would ya?

    -- Posted by BTWinecleff on Thu, Oct 6, 2011, at 3:28 PM
  • Whiner, ....... mmmmmmmaybeee you should look into the dictionary from time to time.

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Thu, Oct 6, 2011, at 5:38 PM
  • I will have to agree with Nick, actually. The barter system didn't fall out of existence because it was broken, but quite the contrary. It worked so well that money wasn't being used enough to sustain the government's expenditures, therefore it was made illegal.

    It is actually the essence of the free trade system. We are doing no more now than our forefathers did back in the day really. If the cost of a car was 10 cows, we now just carry the value of ten cows in a check book as it's much easier to get to the 2nd party, and they in turn can use that money to buy 10 cows at their discretion, without having to feed the cows for that time span which they are not ready to utilize them. Only less due to Uncle Sam's take in the transaction as the dollar is tracked and assessed a tax value.

    Granted, the perceived value of the items to trade for had an element of gray area involved but it seemed to work well, and I believe that in this day and age, and in the current economic state that we find ourselves in, there is more bartering going on than you might think.

    -- Posted by PensiveObserver on Thu, Oct 6, 2011, at 11:32 PM
  • wholy cow, are you and nick twin brothers pensive? youguys always seem to support each other. you said it best, there isnt likely to be a day that we haul 10 cows to the carlot so it doesnt work. thanks for proving my point po.

    -- Posted by BTWinecleff on Thu, Oct 6, 2011, at 11:35 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: