Most witnesses favor allowing horse slaughter

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Members of the Nebraska Legislature's Agriculture Committee listened Tuesday evening to passionate testimony from more than a dozen supporters of a bill that would create a state meat inspection agency to facilitate horse slaughter and the processing of specialty meats.

Sen. Tyson Larson of O'Neill sponsored the legislation and said the measure, LB 305, was a crucial way to help Nebraska agriculture and that state money necessary for funding the new agency is a "worthy investment."

Advocates of the bill said it was necessary to pass the state legislation now because large numbers of horses were being abandoned by horse owners who could no longer afford to care for their horses.

Those favoring the bill said it would create economic development opportunities for rural Nebraska because small slaughterhouses would enter the market to process horses now being shipped to Canada or Mexico for slaughter. Funding for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's horse slaughterhouse inspections ended in 2006.

Others, like Darrel Eberspacher of Seward, who is president of the Belgian Draft Horse Registry Corp., said slaughterhouse processing was part of horse stewardship and was superior to costly euthanasia and proper carcass disposal.

"Only in politically correct America can thousands of dollars be spent on an animal that should have been slaughtered," he said.

Eberspacher said the bill is a profitable way to create a needed product.

Groups supporting the legislation included members of the Nebraska Farm Bureau and the United Horsemen.

Valerie Hinderlider, owner of the Broken Heart Ranch, a horse rescue organization, said she was angry that the bill's language seemed to be crafted explicitly not to mention horse slaughter. Hinderlider said the state's large number of horses was due to irresponsible over breeding.

"Do you want to eat an old horse?" she asked members of the Agriculture Committee during her testimony. Hinderlider said if the bill becomes law, horse slaughterhouse owners will choose to slaughter usable, younger horses because they are a better source of meat.

Derry Mayfield of Seward said he has run a horse buying operation since 2007 that specializes in buying large numbers of horses to be slaughtered in Canada and Mexico.

"I will not send a good horse to slaughter," he said, because usable horses are sold for more than the typical 15 cents per pound for horses sold for meat.

Without domestic slaughterhouses, American horses face inhumane slaughter in other countries and uncertain futures when their owners abandon them, he said.

About 40 people attended the Agriculture Committee hearing. A dozen supporters testified for the bill, while three people testified against it.

Comments
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I don't care if Nebraska wants to have their own meat inspection program, but let's get the horse slaughter specifically excluded from the legislation. "I don't think death is the answer." Is what Gary Biszantz, the former Chairman of Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association in Blood-Horse Magazine as he argued against horse slaughter and proposed one solution. Having worked on a ranch, I was particularly appalled by the testimony of the Nebraska Cattlemen's Mike Kelsey. Why would any beef producer allow another meat, i.e., horse, to be processed in their state that will compete for growing foreign markets? The declining beef market in the U.S. will only get worse if it's associated with horse slaughter. In the hearing Mike Kelsey was enthusiastic about being able to label the state's beef as Nebraska beef as a result of LB305. Yes, it will be great to identify Nebraska beef so the public knows to boycott it because it's from 'Nebraska, the horse killer state.' The Nebraska Cattlemen's support of LB305 and LB306 is a failure of their leadership not to recognize the huge wave of negative publicity coming for Nebraska beef. Where are the good people of Nebraska with forward thinking and moral convictions to stop horse slaughter plants. LB305 and 306 are not Nebraska common sense, it's nonsense!

    -- Posted by bandrews on Wed, Feb 9, 2011, at 2:09 PM
  • It is time our government took a hard look at reconsidering its postition in enabling the King's men, being major horse breeders, with the unethical means of horse slaughter as a way to rid its surplus.

    The 112th Congress is looking for ways to raise revenue. There are

    approximately 9.2 million horses in America. Applying fair taxes to horse

    owners would create significant revenue and spur the economy. Taxing horses

    would also create a greater sense of responsibility for horse owners. Citizens

    take better care of things they have to pay for. Taxing horses would also deter

    horse over-population as breeding would be minimized. Redeeming pride for

    America's much-admired companion animal would make passing Bills to halt horse

    slaughter more favorable.

    Taxing horses would benefit all facets of the horse industry. Revenue would be

    available for trail maintenance in parks, education on horse care and provide

    wages for committees to oversee the horse industry in each state.

    For a copy of a petition pertaining to this article visit Horses as National

    Treasure at

    https://sites.google.com/site/horsesasnationaltreasure/

    -- Posted by StephanieMSellers on Wed, Feb 9, 2011, at 2:17 PM
  • Sen Larson and his supporters talk about "state money necessary" for a profitable, needed product. If horsemeat were such a profitable, needed product, Nebraska (and other states) would already have such an industry. Instead, this bill is all about getting a state subsidy for an unneeded, parasitical business.

    Proper carcass disposal is the responsibility of all animal owners. The rest of us are not subsidized by tax dollars, and government should not be promoting a business that can't exist without abuse and horse theft.

    -- Posted by jrstark on Wed, Feb 9, 2011, at 3:04 PM
  • Thr reason the TB boys are against horse procesing is the drugs they use to make their broomtails run....if we have US Horse Processing we will have drug testing and they will have to crawl under a rock!! Horse meat is good and good for you! As for these bleeding heart animal lovers that think US citizens and illegals will not buy horse meat.....put it in the meat case and see how fast it goes out! Even if we have horse procesing reinstated we will not have the massive horse feedlots they bleeding hearts are crying.....do the math on Beef Cattle and Feeding horses for meat! Beef is far more a profitable venture!! It takes a 1100 lb horse in good conditiion to make a #1 That takes 3-5 years and a lot of grass and hay.....We process beef cattle in 14-20 months.....DO THE MATH!!!

    -- Posted by cattleco on Wed, Feb 9, 2011, at 4:53 PM
  • The name of the Rescue is Break Heart Ranch. There is always more support from the people who will profit from a bill than from those who will not.

    -- Posted by ValH on Wed, Feb 9, 2011, at 5:42 PM
  • cattleco ~ Why actually are you promoting horse slaughter? Can't sell your cattle or what? Whatever, you shouldn't comment on things you know nothing about. For instance your comment on drug residues would be comical if it weren't such a serious problem. ALL American horses - even backyard bareback ponies - regularly receive substances that are strictly forbidden in food animals. There are very few companion horses that haven't had a gram or two of bute in their lives. I gave my own mare a gram this morning because she has thin soles, and the hard winter ground makes her a little ouchy. Just like I took some aspirin this morning because the cold makes my arthritis worse. I also worm my horses regularly as do all conscientious horse owners. I use fly spray in the summer. All these substances have one thing in common - this warning on the label: NOT FOR USE IN HORSES INTENDED FOR FOOD. Ever seen that? That means NOT FOR USE - ever. If a horse has ever in his/her entire life been exposed to any of these - and many more - then are permanently banned from the human food chain. Get it? NO withdrawal period, nothing. Forever unfit for human consumption. There is NO testing or anything else that will change this.

    Maybe you're the one that should crawl under a rock....

    http://www.box.net/shared/v4t8rf13dd

    http://www.box.net/shared/lqi4hhkg42

    -- Posted by MorganLvr on Sat, Feb 12, 2011, at 1:33 PM
  • Horse slaughter in the US was not humane at all, and not any more or less horrific than in Canada or in the federal plants in Mexico where horses processed for the international market are slaughtered. Some local slaughterhouses in Mexico are much worse, but few US horses go there. Those whose meat is going to the EU meet the EU standards which are much higher than ours. Horse slaughter should be considered only if a truly humane holding, transport and slaughter system can be developed - and until we figure out a way to quit putting toxic drugs they have been given into the food chain. Until then, every horse owner owes his/her horse a humane death. The cost of euthanasia and disposal rarely, if ever, costs more than the horse would have cost them over another one or two months, so the money is there. The idea that you care for a living being, tell everyone you care or even love them and then decide to torture them for their last couple of weeks for a few bucks is a disgrace. Don't have a horse at all if you can't afford to care for them responsibily - and that means to a humane ending.

    -- Posted by glebec on Tue, Feb 15, 2011, at 11:05 AM
  • Dear Friends,

    The subject of horse slaughter is heart wrenching. I testified against it at the legislative hearing and was appalled at the callousness of the proponents of the bill - calling themselves, "good stewards" for the horse. This bill is about money, not about mercy. Addressing the cause of horse over population trickles down to breeding operations producing too many horses. Also, the current economy and tax laws contribute to the dilemna. Horse slaughter perpetuates the problem of over population rather than addressing the root of the problem. We need a two pronged approach to finding humane solutions not just for the horse but for the horse breeders as well. Individuals are not reaching out for help until the animals are in dire health and starving. Please be watchful and check on the horses in your area to be certain that they are in good health. If they are not, the sherrif can seize them and call a horse rescue or your animal shelter. Help your local animal shelter raise funds for humane euthanasia should it become necessary. Ask your local veterinarians to contribute their time as well. Also, the government needs to work with the horse breeders to take some of the burden of loss off of their taxes. We are a nation of consumers - 10 Billion animals are slaughtered annually in the US for consumption, thousands are killed in experimentation, thousands are killed for sport, and thousands are killed due to overpopulation due to overbreeding. Wake up America, where does compassion and empathy fit into this picture? There are always solutions better than death. The problem of the over population of horses will get better in the future because the breeders are going out of business or reducing their stock. The economy will turn around again as well. But the breed organizations need to work together to give incentives to their breeders not to over populate horses again. They will benefit as the value of the horses will rise. Being smart rather than weilding an axe is for more humane and intelligent. Those wanting to prosper off of this unfortunate situation lack a strong internal moral compass and we should be wary of them.

    -- Posted by MagnoliaWinorLose on Mon, Mar 14, 2011, at 12:44 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: