Editorial

Texting ban has unintended consequences

Thursday, October 7, 2010

The government's effort to save us from our own stupidity has backfired once again.

We haven't seen many "texting while driving" tickets come through county court, but since July 15, it's been the law of the land that it is illegal to send an SMS from your cell phone while driving.

You can't be pulled over for texting, but if you are stopped for some other reason and then found to have been texting, it's a $200 fine and three points off your license.

The results are predictable.

Rather than not texting, many of us are simply hiding the cell phone below sight level when we text while driving. As a result, we're taking our eyes off the road even longer than when texting was still legal.

It's too early for a Nebraska study, but according to the Highway Loss Data Institute, a research group funded by the automobile insurance industry, four states that outlawed texting while driving have seen no reduction in the number of crashes. In fact, insurance claims related to vehicle crashes went up slightly in California, Louisiana and Minnesota.

"Texting bans haven't reduced crashes at all ... it's an indication that texting bans might even increase of texting for drivers who continue to do so despite the laws," said Adrian Lund, president of both the institute and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety."

The Lancaster (Nebraska) County Sheriff's office said it recently issued its first texting ticket after an officer pulled over a driver who swerved into another lane without signaling.

The driver, an 18-year-old woman, admitted she had been texting, and a bottle of vodka was found in her car. She was cited for driving while intoxicated, texting and being a minor in possession of alcohol.

Clearly, she had more problems than texting while driving.

In the end, the problem probably won't be solved by legislation, but by whatever new technology replaces texting in the next few years.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Business people need to 'hit the ball over the net'. Teens consider it rude not to reply immediately to texts. Home schedules would grind to a halt without immediate communication. We are conditioned to pursue this level of efficiency but we are all supposed cease this behavior once we sit in our respective 5,000 pound pieces of steel and glass. Anyone can win an argument in a forum like this by saying "Just put the phone away" - but we can see its just not happening.

    I just read that 72% of teens text daily - many text more 3000 times a month. New college students no longer have email addresses! They use texting and Facebook - even with their professors. This text and drive issue is in its infancy and its not going away.

    I decided to do something about it after my three year old daughter was nearly run down right in front of me by a texting driver . Instead of a shackle that locks down phones and alienates the user (especially teens) I built a tool called OTTER that is a simple app for smartphones. I think if we can empower the individual then change will come to our highways now and not just our laws.

    Erik Wood, owner

    OTTER LLC

    OTTER app

    -- Posted by ErikWood on Thu, Oct 7, 2010, at 7:13 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: