Editorial

Pro-life group puts pressure on senators

Friday, March 5, 2010

We pointed out earlier in this space the untenable position of pro-life state senators who say they support the unborn, yet would deny prenatal care to the unborn, just because the mother carrying them was illegally in this country.

Now, the powerful Nebraska Right to Life has taken things one step farther, saying it will take senators' vote on the bill, LB110, which it supports, into account when it decides whether to endorse candidates later this month.

Gov. Dave Heineman says he will veto the bill if it reaches his desk.

The bill is expected to be advanced out of committee next week to the full Legislature, but it's unclear when it will come up for debate and a vote.

Nebraska has been providing prenatal care for pregnant illegal immigrants for nearly 30 years, under the reasoning that their children will be U.S. citizens, and thus eligible for Medicaid, once they are born.

The state received notification from federal officials last year that the state was breaking federal rules by doing so.

Since fiscal and social conservatism often go hand-in-hand, it's hard to see where Nebraska Right to Life could find candidates to endorse who meet the narrow parameters of supporting LB110 yet opposing abortion. Support for the bill is probably stronger at the opposite end of the political spectrum, candidates NRTL is unlikely to endorse.

Both Heineman and many fiscally conservative senators think it's wrong for illegal immigrants to receive taxpayer-funded benefits, and they have a good point.

There's no easy way out for state senators still on the fence about prenatal care for illegal immigrants. Our elected officials will have to vote their consciences, regardless of the consequences. In a way, that's a refreshing development.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Any more illegal than the federal government mandating strip clubs or brothels. The zoning of business should be the business of the community first and foremost.

    At the state level rules are there to limit behavior when its deemed destructive. Are abortion clinics something the community needs and is it a destructive behavior that impacts family,community and the state? How could the state have a vested interest in illegal immigation but not mass abortion's in it's jurisdiction?

    -- Posted by boonesc on Mon, Mar 8, 2010, at 3:24 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: