Letter to the Editor

Congratulations

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Dear Editor,

Nebraskans for Peace is pleased that President Barack Obama has received this year's Nobel Prize. The Nobel Committee appears to have awarded the prize for Mr. Obama's work to reduce and eliminate nuclear weapons around the world; his efforts to reduce the greenhouse gases that create climate change and threaten global security, forcing mass movements of refugees to escape climate change; and his stance of relying on negotiation, regional alliances and the United Nations instead of unilateral American actions to solve global problems.

We applaud the efforts that won President Obama the prize, particularly if he continues them forcefully throughout his administration. We also applaud his pullback of STRATCOM missiles in Poland and the Czech Republic, from close to the Russian border, because the missiles clearly made Russia feel threatened and did not deal creatively with the strategic threat they were supposed to handle, that is, the possible use of Iranian missiles and nuclear weapons to threaten Israel and other Middle Eastern and Southern European countries. Finally, we are encouraged by President Obama's Cairo speech indicating that the U.S. and he himself have no quarrel with mainstream Islamic believers but rather with the resort to violent means fostered by al-Qaeda and other splinter groups within Islam.

The Prize is given not for what Obama has completed but for what he has begun. Several other world leaders have received the Nobel Peace Prize early in their work at reducing global tensions, including Mr. Gorbachev of Russia. The Prize need not go to old white septuagenarians. It is designed to recognize good work and encourage more of it. So we do not feel that the granting of the prize is necessarily premature.

At the same time, we are concerned that President Obama use his power as president and Nobel laureate to return Iraq to the Iraqi people as quickly as possible, to push forcefully for peace between Israel and Palestine -- including embargoing the sale of munitions to either side and the granting of aid to them so long as they are belligerents -- and that he place the issues of Afghanistan and West Pakistan as quickly as possible in the hands of international peacekeeping agencies such as the United Nations.

Peace,

Paul Olson,

President Nebraskans for Peace

Lincoln

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    I see Cracker Jack has added a new prize to their Cracker Jack list. The package states "2009 Nobel Peace Prize Inside".

    Did you get yours??

    -- Posted by ksfarmer on Sat, Oct 17, 2009, at 1:41 PM
  • I would sure hate to be an "old white septuagenarian" right now.

    On a side note...I am also planning on getting my Eagle Scout award next year...so can I just have it now?

    I am also planning on getting a pilots license...so...can I?

    Fredd is thinking about getting an education...he has just been given a Rhodes scholarship.

    It's right here in black and white people - "We applaud the efforts that won President Obama the prize, particularly if he continues them forcefully throughout his administration." What more needs to be said?

    -- Posted by Husker23 on Tue, Oct 20, 2009, at 3:13 PM
  • My son is in cub scouts right now. I'm hoping he's going to become an Eagle Scout some day. Can he just get the award now for what he has started, even though he's so far from accomplishing anything needed to become one?

    What is it with this liberal definition of everything.

    Obama has not become entangled in any international issue only because he has largely ignored them. There is no more peace now than there was 2 years ago ANYWHERE! There is also no way to prove there will be any more peace as a result of his international ignorance.

    Here are some examples of everyday things we could apply this guy's liberal logic to:

    I have't finished my work yet, so can I get paid in full right now?

    I only completed 10% of my homework, where's my A+?

    I only made $50,000 this year, where is my loan for the new $550,000 home I want?

    I was meaning to go to college, but didn't feel like it, surely the government will fix me up with a great job and great benefits!

    I thought about showing my children how to be good citizens, but they'll learn it later when they're older.

    I'm sorry, but this whole award and the excuses people are using to defend it are rediculous, and it only proves who rediculous extreme liberalism is getting. Let's reward people for their desire to achieve rather than their actual achievements.

    This country will not prosper under this kind of liberalism. People will not strive to do anything extraordinary when the payout is so easy and attainable it doesn't mean anything.

    It is a recipe for mediocrity and laziness.

    -- Posted by Justin76 on Wed, Oct 21, 2009, at 1:15 PM
  • again fredd, you wouldn't have a clue if someone handed it to you. Bush actually had a small recession in his first year and combated it with lower taxes to spark the economy.

    Why don't you at least do some research or pay attention to the news instead of coming here with your lazy as hell arguments that are noting but whining about Bush. Bush is gone in case you didn't know it.

    How old are you anyway? Any chance your going to be dead when all this inflation and debt come home to roost? Well I'm young enough to care what's going on. I have another 30 years of working left before I can even think about slowing down.

    All this article was about was Obama getting praise for things he has not even done yet. If you want to bring Bush inot the argument, we could argue that Bush never got anything for what he did, like keeping us safe after 9/11.

    Not only did everyone in the world think that's what happened here, but not the Nebraska's for Peace come right out here and defend the fact that he was given an award and prize money not for things he has accomplished, but for what he hopes to accomplish.

    Well heck, fredd, I want to invent a power plant that uses our own garbage to produce energy and has zero waste or emmisions. Can I have my award now?

    You can't even counter the points I bring up about the liberal movement to award non achievemet. The only thing you could do was bring Bush hate into the fray. That is lame and lazy. I guess in a way you helped prove my point.

    -- Posted by Justin76 on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, at 9:27 AM
  • Pay no attention to fredd. He appears to be devoted to playing the role of the generic strawman liberal, serving only to hurl generic insults at those who don't support his opinions. There's little value in wasting intelligent discussion with someone like that.

    -- Posted by bjo on Thu, Oct 22, 2009, at 3:51 PM
  • I'd be more worried about Obama winning a Nobel Peace Prize if I could name more then a couple winners.

    -- Posted by npwinder on Sun, Oct 25, 2009, at 11:32 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: