Letter to the Editor

Leverage your vote

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Dear Editor,

Your party may not necessarily be counting on your vote. As long as the two can tolerate each other, the voter and the party will work together toward common goals. But what happens when the relationship becomes intolerable?

Without your support, your party relies on an opposite strategy -- they count on your inactivity. It is customary that Americans stay away from the polls when they are dissatisfied. In fact, there seems to be a lot of that going on these days. I agree with the old adage that this is not only a crime against yourself, it is also the punishment.

Your silence is the very reaction political entities should desire at the instant you disagree with them. We are somehow schooled to believe that by remaining silent, or by voting for an insignificant third party we are being as rebellious as a voter can be. Yet, because so many are now staying away from the polls, because we have become so predictable, the only action that ever seems to motivate a major political party is the outright mass exodus of its supporters. It is only then that the Party begins to implement measures to get back to what it once stood for. Because this seems to be true, we do neither ourselves, nor our political parties, nor our country any good by remaining silent.

Consider this for a moment -- if you choose silence as a means of dissent, your party must, in order to maintain the status quo, find one vote to replace yours or, at the very least, frustrate one of their opponent's constituents into abstaining from casting a ballot also. If instead, you threaten to cast a ballot for your party's opponent, your party must now find two votes to maintain the status quo.

Congratulations -- you have just leveraged your solitary vote! And, if you threaten to contribute cash to their opponent's campaign along with your vote, enabling them to pursue even more votes, the ground your party must cover to compensate for their readiness to part with you begins to become a formidable task.

Though this may seem a little extreme to a die-hard, yet frustrated loyal party member, let us keep things in perspective by remembering to what extremes our forefathers went in the founding of this country. To jump a party line in order to drive home a point is hardly extreme at all!

In most things silence truly is golden. In the world of dissent -- it's probably the least effective choice you can make. Want to make change? Practice using your vote for a change.

Al Dunworth


View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Totally agree Al - we need to hold them accountable for their actions or inactions - not voting only gives them a pass and does nothing to ensure that we get the representation our forefathers gave us!

    Rule to live by - If you choose not to participate - you can't complain when a bad situation doesn't get better.

    -- Posted by commonsense2 on Wed, Sep 17, 2008, at 3:19 PM
  • Ah, yes, but, There is the factor of suffering no one desires to consider. To be unhappy with the preferred 'Party' is one matter of concern, but to vote for a person who does not represent the voters needs and desires, just to make a 'statement' is *bleep*! Vote an educated vote, yes. Make a 'Political Statement,' by voting for an unacceptable choice, no.

    I promote, strongly, voting, but reject any political suicide type vote. I disagree with your suggestion.

    Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Wed, Sep 17, 2008, at 8:56 PM
  • Remember, for those of us voting for Palin/McCain, vote date is November the 4th.

    For those who prefer Obama and what's his face, the voting date is November 5th.


    -- Posted by Jim Foster on Wed, Sep 17, 2008, at 9:08 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: