Letter to the Editor

Misplaced anger

Friday, September 21, 2007

Dear Editor,

The pain that family members endure from a heinous and despicable crime committed by other family members must be very agonizing to say the least.  However, it is wrong to transfer that anguish and anger to someone other than the actual perpetrators of the original crime.

History is history and there are occasions when we feel proud about our past and there are times we feel very disheartened and sad at what has transpired.  But history is history and if it happened, good or bad, it happened and nothing can change that.  The only thing we can do is change our perspective in how we react to it. 

The "hate mail" that was sent to the Gazette chastising Walt Sehnert for his article on the Travis murder seems to be a knee jerk reaction by family members and others with similar circumstances.  Although it is an unpleasant memory we are all in denial if we want to pretend it never happened. It is ironic and somewhat disappointing that none of the "hate mail" made any mention of the torment or grief of the deceased or their families.  The only "victims" that were mentioned in the "hate mail" were the family members of the perpetrators and not one solitary word about the deceased or rape victims and their families.  Where is the compassion of the "hate mail" writers toward the true victims?

I am sure Jerry Travis would have liked to have had a chance to live his life to the fullest.   I am sure the lady that was raped and nearly died in Lincoln would like to pretend it never happened but it did!  Some of the other murders mentioned occurred in Sutherland Neb., where six people were murdered with a 10 year old girl and an adult lady raped before they were killed.  Do we still want to pretend it never happened? 

One of the "hate mail" authors blames the Travis murder on the "big shots of this town".  Another says "I hope that one day Mr. Sehnert's dirty laundry is hung out to dry in front of the whole community".  If these family members and friends have truly forgiven the original perpetrators, it follows that they should also forgive anyone that makes mention of it today and not direct their anger toward the messenger.  If they have not forgiven the perpetrators, it is just plain wrong to transfer that anger toward someone that makes mention of a past horrible event. 

If we are so virtuous to demand that anything historic cannot offend anyone then we are done with history. Do we all trash our Holy Bibles because of all the atrocious acts that it depicts?  History will continue to be good or bad, depending on one's perspective.  We need to be aware of what caused the historic event, good or bad, and not try to impugn or malign the messenger.  I will continue to look forward to more columns and articles in the Gazette by Mr. Sehnert.

I trust the family members that are struggling with the acts of others can find it in their hearts to forgive those that offend them.  The offender(s), however, is not Mr. Sehnert.   


Jim Wesch


View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • How dare you say that we want to forget, all any of us said is it is in the past,. I dont recall anyone person saying that they didnt feel bad for the other families involved, On the contrary, all the ones I read said they felt bad for everyone involved. That does mean everyone.. Im sure all involved are doing their best to get along. Then to have this brought up into there lives all over again, is as if it happened yesterday.. Why would anyone including Mr. Sehnert, want to do that to the good people who did not commit the murders.

    Did he for one second consider the consequenses of such a story,. Did he let the families involved (all of them ) know this story was to be printed. Last time I checked, you do have to do that in such a manner. It would seem to be the considerate thing to do for all involved.

    Why do you call it hate mail. You got the response you wanted didnt you?. You succeeded in hurting 4 wonderful families who were trying to get on with their lives.

    And just for the record, I know with out a doubt, there isnt a day that goes by,that my Incredible Aunt prays for her family and all involved and the pain everyone feels.

    She nor the brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins.. are responsible for what happened.But unfortunatly it did happen. and I know ALL involved are trying to get along as best they can. Then there is this story to bring it up again.

    So how dare YOU, get upset at the thought of the families being hurt by this.. And I do mean all the families...

    Hate mail!!!

    I cant for the life of me believe you are actually shocked......

    I will pray for the families involved, and hope this heartless, non-feeling publication

    hasnt caused more harm than good..

    -- Posted by sleepwalkin on Fri, Sep 21, 2007, at 2:41 PM
  • I guess according to the murders family and friends in McCook bringing up the 9/11 murders by terrorist in N.Y. and even the Norfolk murders at the US Bank are off limits to remember even though the families of the real victims have to think how their family members were killed like a rabid dog, shot in the face/back point blank like their family members did north of McCook.. Sorry you can move out of McCook if it's that bad and start over but the real victims are dead........and not complaining about people of the community remembering them.........

    -- Posted by Cornwhisperer on Wed, Sep 26, 2007, at 12:45 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: