Editorial

'Vietnam Vet' really wasn't

Thursday, January 24, 2019

A caller this morning pointed out that a caption on a photo on page 3 of Wednesday’s edition is apparently incorrect. Omaha tribe elder Nate Phillips, involved in a video recording of a confrontation with a Catholic boys school student at a demonstration in Washington, has described himself as a Vietnam vet. Since the incident put him in the spotlight, however, critics have determined that while he was a Marine during the Vietnam war, he was never actually deployed to Vietnam. Calling him a Vietnam vet is disrespectful to actual Vietnam vets, the caller said.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Actually Nathan Phillips served in the US Marine Corps during the years of the Vietnam Conflict. According to the rules of the Department of Defense, he is entitled to be called a "Vietnam Era Veteran." Your editorial did a disservice to an American patriot.

    -- Posted by Virginia B Trail on Wed, Jan 30, 2019, at 1:44 PM
  • Um, sure. His most important job was to keep AC and refrigeration units going. And by his records, he was AWOL most of that time.

    -- Posted by Dudley Dawson on Thu, Jan 31, 2019, at 6:17 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: