Editorial

Environmental sacrifices must be shared equally

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

A completely public power state, Nebraska's electric rates are amount the lowest in the nation, but that public power status, coupled with a limited distribution system has hindered development of alternative energy such as wind and solar.

President Obama, ready to leave office in 18 months, taking action that might have been politically risky earlier in his term(s), unveiled regulations to cut nationwide carbon dioxide emissions 32 percent by 2030.

It varies by state, but Nebraska's new goal is to reduce carbon emissions by 40 percent between 2012 and 2030, a higher goal because of our reliance on coal for power.

Nebraska will join a lawsuit to fight the federal rules, challenging the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to adopt the stricter emissions standards.

States have until 2018 to submit their final emission reduction plans to the EPA, with gradual step-down phases beginning in 2022 through 2029, with the final targets to be met in 2030.

We don't have space here to explore the whole climate change/global warming debate, but without the cooperation of developing economies such as India and China, meager U.S. efforts will have little effect on a global scale.

We also have to wonder how big a role the carbon credit trading industry has played in Obama's actions.

Check out Al Gore's investments in that industry, which "conveniently" benefits from his 2006 film on climate change, "An Inconvenient Truth."

That film was produced by Gore associates who, with the former vice president, reaped millions of dollars from investors betting on tighter carbon emission regulations.

We can all agree that it's important to protect the environment, but sacrifices must be shared equally and must not be imposed to benefit the wealthy.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • About 70 percent of the power in Nebraska comes from coal . The move away from coal has already cost the blue collar coal workers jobs, the railroad haulers jobs and increase the power companies rates they charge all power users. Even with huge government subsidies wind and solar power are still much more expensive than coal. You are correct that if India and China continue their growth with coal, the efforts of the U.S. To cut back will not make much, if any difference. And the wealthy Democrats ..Clinton and Gore...that buy engery credits so they can continue to fly their private jets and power their homes with coal is just a joke.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Aug 6, 2015, at 3:29 PM
  • Where was the Gazette when Vice President Dick Cheney was pushing government contracts for Haliburton - which he once worked for? Billions of dollars unaccounted for.

    Dennis - since your against subsidies you should also mention ethanol and farm subsidies.

    -- Posted by Geezer on Fri, Aug 7, 2015, at 3:24 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: