Editorial

Conservatives get most of their news from fewer sources

Friday, October 24, 2014

If you think America has become too polarized, you might not have to look as far as Washington to find the reason.

You might check the buttons on your remote control to see which ones are worn out.

We were a lot more homogonized when everyone tuned in to the 5:30 p.m. news to see what Walter Cronkite had to say about the Vietnam war or the Watergate scandal.

Cronkite, for his part, felt the responsibility to present a balanced report on the current happenings, his traditional journalistic training winning the vast majority of days over rating or management pressures.

With only three major networks -- all of them taking cues from traditional news sources like the New York Times -- viewers had the choice of few flavors on the media menu.

Not so today.

First cable television, then the Internet, created an extensive a la carte selection of takes on the day's occurrences.

But many of us don't take advantage of the myriad offerings.

That's especially true of the "consistent conservatives" polled by the Pew Research Journalism Project.

According to the new study, 47 percent of the people in this group cite Fox News as their main source of news about the government and politics.

They also expressed more distrust than trust of 24 of the 36 news sources measured in the survey, but 88 percent of them said they trusted Fox News.

Consistent conservatives are more likely than those in other ideological groups to hear political opinions that are in line with their own views, and are more likely to have friends who share their own political views. Two-thirds say most of their close friends share their views on government and politics.

Those with consistent liberal views, however, rely on a wider variety of news sources -- 15 percent CNN, 12 percent MSNBC, 13 percent NPR and 10 percent New York Times. They say they trust 28 of the 36 news outlets in the survey -- NPR, PBS and the BBC the most.

They are, however, more likely to block or "defriend" someone on a social network, as well as end a personal friendship, because of politics.

And, they are more likely to follow issue-based groups rather than political parties or candidates in their Facebook feeds.

We don't disagree that much of the traditional media tended to fall toward the left of the political spectrum. We once heard a representative of one of our state's major newspapers say he favored a more liberal stance because that would make the newspaper more attractive to a wider audience.

Bernard Goldberg's book "Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News," was an eye-opener when it was published in 2001, if it is to be believed.

But do we have trouble with media outlets which deliberately bias the news to pander to a certain audience in order to increase market share.

Cultivating friends and hearing viewpoints from all parts of the political spectrum in pursuit of the truth is much more invigorating personally and much more helpful in the long run to our political system and society in general.

Comments
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Ah yes, the good old days. I remember when a newspaper or any other news organization would have been chastised for displaying such laziness to use phrases such as, "some are saying", or "some say" blah, blah, blah. Saw it just the other day in one of your editorials, at which point I never know who to enter in there in my mind. Others..Michael Savage? Thom Hartman? Michael Moore? Mark Levin? the CDC? Dick Trail? the RNC? Bernie Sanders? Just exactly who is/are "some"?

    -- Posted by hulapopper on Sat, Oct 25, 2014, at 5:14 AM
  • I agree with hulapopper, this is the most sloppily slapped together piece of journalism ever in the Gazette. Forty seven percent is used to broad brush all conservatives. What about the 53%, you know, also known as the majority?

    Where is the proof Fox News is somehow conservative in it's views? Why does it absolutely dominate tge news ratings? Could it be it's reporting is more close to the truth? And why is CNN, MSNBC and PBS still bottom feeders.

    Which is more harmful to society, 47 percent of conservative obtaining their new and opinion shaping from Fox News, or the closed-minded intolerant liberals?

    The real headline should have read, "The failure of print media to to shape minds". There's a reason I don't pay for news subscriptions, they lie. I t's time for southwest Nebraska to have an alternative news source.

    -- Posted by Hugh Jassle on Sat, Oct 25, 2014, at 10:28 PM
  • "It's time for southwest Nebraska to have an alternative news source." Right on Chunky Peanut Butter. One that is fair, honest and has some facts.

    -- Posted by S&P1958 on Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 11:50 AM
  • Fox news consistently has problems with reporting the truth rather than far right opinion/fairy tales. The fallacy of liberal bias is a horror story promoted by the likes of Limbaugh, Fox News, etc. At least Glen Beck had the decency to apologize for his lack of professionalism in the past.

    Found the point that liberals are more likely to defriend/block/end friendships because of political differences interesting. My personal experience has been right-wingers doing just that consistently--while I never have (though have been tempted to do so on occasion.)

    We have a wonderful, though imperfect, country--sad that so many live in fear and ignorance rather than embracing the positive and good.

    -- Posted by ontheleftcoast on Wed, Oct 29, 2014, at 8:56 AM
  • This discussion reminds me of an old joke.

    Liberals want you to think like them.

    Conservatives just want you to think.

    Any thinking person realizes that you have to have both sides of a 'discussion' to make a informed decision. Personally I not only listen/read Fox but also PBS, CNN, Drudge, and even Huffington Post. Be informed!

    -- Posted by quick13 on Wed, Oct 29, 2014, at 9:35 AM
  • *

    Hula and Chunky are spot on again. A partisan liberal hack job perpetrated obviously by a Democrat Party Comrade. What is funny is that CNN MSNBC, the Times, NPR all spew the exact same liberal bs so why would viewing as assortment of liberal trash be any better than viewing only Fox?? People are sick of the liberal press. All one has to do is watch some of it or watch closely as one of them moderates a debate to realize everything Goldberg said is the truth.

    -- Posted by divorcedugly on Wed, Oct 29, 2014, at 4:22 PM
  • Locally the Gazette did not do any stories of their own on The Stroup failure to pay four years of property and occupation taxes or the lawsuit against him for failure to pay for feed and grain.

    -- Posted by dennis on Mon, Nov 3, 2014, at 4:19 PM
  • Correction, the Gazette did mention that at the Culbertson meeting a citizen did ask Stroup about why he did not pay his taxes. The Gazette did run a story on the lawsuit on the web but not the print edition.

    -- Posted by dennis on Tue, Nov 4, 2014, at 2:44 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: