Local implications likely in tax case from N-CORPE

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

They say agriculture is the only industry where producers buy raw material at retail and sell finished products at wholesale.

Does that include water, the most vital component?

And, does the "factory" involved in the production deserve to be taxed, even when its output is going to be drastically reduced?

How about the entities, especially school districts, that depend on the tax proceeds?

Those are some of the issues the Lincoln County commissioners are grappling with as they are forced to break new ground in connection with new water issues.

On Monday, the board refused to grant a tax exemption to 19,500 acres that have been converted from irrigated potato production to grassland.

In action that will by challenged by the N-CORPE agency -- Twin Platte, Upper, Middle and Lower Republican natural resources districts -- Lincoln County commissioners instead accepted the county assessor's plan to tax the parcels at grassland value.

"That way, I'm basically giving them an exemption on the water," Assessor Julie Stenger told the board.

Even at that, the Wallace school district will lose tax support, though not to the level, 8 percent, it would have had the land become totally tax exempt.

Twin Platte NRD general manager Kent Miller noted that N-CORPE would pay taxes if it could, but its lawyers say public funds can't be used to pay property taxes. Miller can see both sides of the issue, since he also serves on the board of the Mid Plains Community College Area which stands to lose some income as a result of the valuation change on the former farmland.

N-CORPE purchased the land, took it out of crop production, and plans to pump the water, instead, into the Platte and Republican rivers to meet environmental and Republican River Compact demands. Legal challenges to the plan were not unexpected, and this almost certainly won't be the last.

Southwest Nebraskans, who will face similar issues if more irrigated land has to be taken out of production, will do well to keep an eye on the case.

View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • This problem is one big reason the new legislation will require public hearings on augumentation projects to have hearings prior to adoption, like the Lincoln County water farm. Promises by some to do it now have turned sour and hurt others.

    -- Posted by dennis on Wed, Apr 23, 2014, at 8:36 PM
  • This is the reason the new legislation was needed. It will require hearings prior to augumentation projects being adopted instead of the quick vote required on the Lincoln County water farm deal that has hurt others and now is even a bigger problem. Doing more of the same, following the same "leaders" is not the answer. The Lincoln County project is not a "band aide" it is a new wound.

    -- Posted by dennis on Wed, Apr 23, 2014, at 8:43 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: