Editorial

What if we treated all athletes like skateboarders?

Thursday, August 1, 2013

A TV commercial in the early 90s depicted two joggers casually running down a neighborhood street. As a car approached, one smacked the other on the leg and said "cop." The pair immediately stopped jogging and began to walk. A few moments later, after the police car was out of sight, they resumed their jog with a sigh of relief.

A subsequent caption read, "What if we treated all athletes like skateboarders."

Skateboarding opponents may logically argue the differences between the sport and other activities, but both sides would likely agree the message from the commercial holds true, most people do not view skateboarders in the same light as they do other athletes.

A group of McCook skateboarders and their parents have been organizing support for the construction of a public skate park and hope the McCook City Council will take steps during Monday's meeting, Aug. 5, to assist them financially.

"As we have worked on this over the past year we have really appreciated the hundreds of people who have voiced support for the project. It has the potential to add a great sport to the choices available to our young people in the area. It would be helpful if folks would back the kids as they present their request to the City Council on Monday," said Rex Nelson on behalf of the group, "Build McCook a Skate Park."

The group, led by Nelson and co-president Christian Olson, has certainly approached the project in an organized manner and should serve as a template for how similar public projects are pursued in the future. The skate park supporters have organized regular meetings; researched and made progress in applying for grants to assist their project; enlisted the help of experienced volunteers to provide input on the design process; appeared before the city council and parks advisory board to inform them of their goal and solicit input; as well as coordinated and staffed parade floats and booths during local events to recruit supporters and donations.

Despite their enthusiastic efforts, the skate park project has not avoided the prejudices referenced in the 90s commercial.

Mayor Dennis Berry has repeatedly pitted support for a skate park project against any type of improvements at the McCook city pool.

"Just today people were telling me they would rather have enhancements at the pool," said Berry most recently, during Monday's city council meeting.

It is certainly understandable that the number of projects the city can lend financial support to is limited, however, Berry's comments serve not only to rally supporters of pool improvements against the skate park project, but also raise questions when comparing the organized support of the two projects.

Citizens have not organized meetings in support of improvements at the city pool. There is no recent history of previous unrelated groups raising funds for pool improvements, yet there have been previous groups which raised funds for a skate park and ultimately failed to get the project off the ground.

Volunteers have already begun grant research and design work for a skate park, yet neither have been worked on for a pool project, aside from any preliminary efforts put in by city staff.

The pool project was originally budgeted for $180,000 in funds to build a water slide, which appeared to draw broad support. It has since been downgraded to something akin to the "splash pad" installed in Cambridge recently, due to the slide expense being higher than anticipated.

The comparison does not indicate whether Mayor Berry would be more or less supportive of a parks project driven by athletes from a different sport, but it is fair to say the support and efforts of local skate park supporters hold little value when compared to a water project with no organized support.

The seemingly unenthusiastic reaction to the project was shared by at least one parks advisory board member as well. The board member raised concerns in August 2012 that the proposed site location would cause parking issues in an area utilized by the McCook YMCA and McCook High School students, while also questioning whether there was enough youth support for a skate park. The concerns pertaining to usage were raised despite skate park representatives informing the parks board they had obtained more than 700 signatures within a few short weeks in support of the project.

During a followup meeting with the parks board in May 2013, skate park representatives were asked to provide detailed information supporting their anticipated usage of the skate park. The request seems like a logical approach at first glance, however, it raises additional questions as to whether the skate park project is being treated like other projects, given that usage studies have not been mentioned in other recent parks board meetings during conversations relating to park projects and expenditures.

During Monday's city council budget meeting, City Manager Jeff Hancock recommended city staff and parks advisory members take a step back and review the community's recreational assets as well as long term recreational needs.

"I really think the parks board and council should look at what our recreational needs are and see where we are short or heavy," said Hancock, adding that the addition of a couple of baseball fields could qualify McCook to host more tournaments.

Hancock's suggestion appears grounded in both logic and common-sense. For organized supporters of a new skate park, however, it will likely be difficult to see it as anything other than a delay in their project and leave them wondering where the supporters for every other competing project have been over the past several years.

Comments
View 14 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I really do not think the mayor, council or parks advisory members oppose a skate park. The reality is the city has only a limited amount of money. It would appear that the intent is to place the limited dollars were the most children and adults would use them and to where the most out of town people would come to McCook to use them while they shop, dine and stay at McCook businesses. Building and maintaining a skate park could mean not making improvements to other areas or raising taxes to pay for new parks.It does make sense to ask the parks board to review the needs and maybe survey the children as to what they want. It is wise for council members to listen to citizens and get their views on all city expenses. It is wise to get a handle on usage of new ideas as numbers are there on pool and ball park use. When the city had a small, unsupervised skate park before it was repeatedly vandalized and finally removed. The question is where should the city put taxpayers dollars to provide recreational activities. Playground equipment, yes! Ball diamonds, yes! Fishing ponds, yes! Basketball courts, yes! Walking trail, yes! Swimming pool, yes! Picnics areas, yes! Tennis courts, yes! Golf courses, yes! Band Shell,yes! Libraries, yes! Sand volleyball, yes! Horseshoe areas, yes! Skateparks, yes! Citizens need to let the council know where the want their dollars spent or if they want taxes raised for a new project.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 5:11 PM
  • It sounds like citizens are letting the council know where they want their dollars spent. That was kind of a major point of the article about the hard work these kids and their parents did before going before the council. Ben Nelson got an airport named after him with less support than these people have.

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 5:26 PM
  • I was in boulder a few weeks ago. They have a skatepark. It's extremely nice and well frequented. The thing about it is that it no doubt cost many millions to build. You can see it on the internet - look for "boulder skate park". The trouble for McCook is definitely the money. Look at the design of boulder's and you will see what I mean. If mccook builds one it will be a cheap one. Not one like the neat one in boulder. And a cheap one just wont do. It would not attract anyone.

    -- Posted by bob s on Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 6:25 PM
  • According to skate park international the average size is 8'000 square feet. They say concrete average cost is $35 per sq ft. So the average cost is $280,000. This cost does NOT include land purchase for location, design, landscaping, fencing, lighting, seating or related start up costs. We are all proud of the efforts of our local skate park group...not sure of how many people we talking about though. Hopefully the group will have good ideas for the funding and maintaince of a facility. Again, the question is how high of a priority is this when compared to other project requests. One such request was to not fund the pool ideas and use the dollars to lower water, sewer,trash rates. So many requests, so few dollars. That is why the council makes the big bucks.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 6:28 PM
  • More than $200,000 in uncommitted community betterment funds available without the cancellation of any other local project, without raising taxes, without taking money that was otherwise committed to "lower sewer and water rates." It would not even require touching uncommitted sales tax funds in the proposed budget. Interesting what can be found with a quick glance, referencing the funds in the budget and the Keno story in the same edition of the Gazette as the Skatepark story.

    As you already know Dennis, the skate park is only requesting $75,000 and plans to raise $15,000 to $25,000 on their own. They have several options for land and at least one scenario where land has been considered to be donated. No exaggerated plans for $280,000 as you imply.

    -- Posted by Bruce Baker on Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 8:23 PM
  • Someone should call boulder parks and recreation and find out their costs - i'm probably accurate on it.

    -- Posted by bob s on Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 8:47 PM
  • Did not know the cost they are requesting or the size. The council may have thought about using the uncommitted to up the dollars available for the pool but could do both. The council does have more Keno funds. It was suggested to begin sitting money aside to address the St. Catherine's concerns. We all might be getting ahead of ourselves until we see the real figures and think of all the community needs. I am sure the skate park will get a fair look.

    -- Posted by dennis on Fri, Aug 2, 2013, at 12:27 AM
  • Dennis is right. They could be getting ahead of themselves since the city doesn't own St. Catherine's yet and is not currently pursuing any action to do so, there are only rough and unofficial estimates of the cost to bring it down and no solid plan about what to do with the empty space after it's torn down at some uncertain time in the future.

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Fri, Aug 2, 2013, at 11:28 AM
  • Just doing a little research on the cost of the equipment for a water slide and it seems that there are water slides available under budget that the kids would enjoy and one link has some that are higher priced than the others.So maybe we could get a better explanation of where the high cost is coming from.

    http://www.swimmingpoolslides.net/commercial-water-slides.php

    http://www.detailedplaypro.com/water-slides.htm#1

    http://www.primepoolmarket.com/Pool_Slides_s/4740.htm?searching=Y&sort=13&cat=47...

    http://www.lincolnaquatics.com/shop/catalog/Water+Slides/product.html?ProductID=...

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Sat, Aug 3, 2013, at 12:56 AM
  • The slide cost was not the big problem but the extra lift required by the ADA.

    -- Posted by dennis on Sat, Aug 3, 2013, at 8:19 AM
  • Build the park. Branch out to cater a wider variety of people. I never go to the pool, but would love a skate park, and I'm 25 years old.

    -- Posted by youngneighbor on Sat, Aug 3, 2013, at 1:22 PM
  • Like these lifts?

    http://www.spinlife.com/critpath/match.cfm?categoryID=527

    They range from $3,000 - $7,000 each plus installation.

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Sat, Aug 3, 2013, at 3:09 PM
  • What happens when someone falls off the skateboard and gets hurt? Who will be responsible for the medical bills? I have seen young kids skateboarding near McDonald's and Wendy's, at night, paying no attention to traffic - what are the laws on this?

    -- Posted by mrbj on Sat, Aug 3, 2013, at 5:10 PM
  • A skate park would have specific liability protections under the Recreation Liability Act. It would prevent the city from being held liable for people falling off their skateboards at a skate park as long as there is no charge for the use of the skate park. That would mean there would be less liability for a skate park than the pool because the pool charges for its use and therefore loses its liability protections under the act.

    -- Posted by Aaron Kircher on Sun, Aug 4, 2013, at 1:49 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: