Study shows Dust Bowl threat not yet thing of the past

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

If you caught the Ken Burns series "The Dust Bowl," you learned how economic and weather conditions can combine to produce an ecological disaster.

High wheat prices during World War I prodded farmers, some of them absentee landowners, to break up fragile prairie land which was then left to blow away once the next period of drought set in.

Surely we've moved beyond that today, right?

Perhaps not.

Yes, we have valuable conservation systems in place today, subsidies to encourage farmers to adopts practices to keep their topsoil on the land.

But a new study by South Dakota State University said some of the same factors that created the Dust Bowl of the 1930s are in play again today.

Christopher Wright and Michael Wimberly of the Geographic Information Science Center of Excellence at SDSU said a recent doubling in commodity prices has spurred the conversion of 1.3 million acres of grassland into corn and soybean cropland over the last five years in South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota and Iowa.

"Historically, comparable grassland conversion rates have not been seen in the Corn Belt since the 1920s and 1930s, the era of rapid mechanization of U.S. agriculture," the authors wrote.

High prices resulting in a large part by demand for biofuel feedstocks, have caused farming on more marginal lands, with high potential for erosion and drought, comparable to deforestation in Brazil, Malaysia and Indonesia, albeit on a smaller area.

Ducks Unlimited is getting into the act, supporting the Protect Our Prairies Act, which would conserve native grasslands by reducing crop insurance for the first four years on newly broken native sod or grasslands.

The study seemed to indicate that farmers are moving away from livestock in places like the Dakotas and Minnesota, while Southwest Nebraska is moving toward more irrigation, probably as cropland is converted from wheat to corn.

The authors say their findings have implications for the region's land productivity, carbon sequestration, biodiversity, flood risk and vulnerability to drought.

If anyone droubt the danger, however, all they have to do is check out Ken Burns' film. http://www.pbs.org/kenburns/dustbowl/

View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • One of the things I find most disturbing,at least in the area of Nebraska where I currently live is the removal of trees to make room for center pivot irrigation systems. The majority of these trees especially Maclura Pomifera the Osage Orange or hedge apple trees which were planted to alleviate just such conditions as created the dust bowl. Their removal for the purpose of clearing the way for center pivots is short-sighted for several reasons among them being the removal of windbreak,carbon removal for a device which only quickens the pace of the depletion of the Ogallala aquifer,and the reduction of wildlife habitat.One wonders about the reaction of the farmers who planted those trees at their destruction for the sake of a few dollars more profit.

    -- Posted by davis_x_machina on Thu, Feb 21, 2013, at 8:31 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: