Letter to the Editor

NPPD's misleading wind power figures

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Nebraska Public Power District, the state's largest generating utility, is preparing to spend more than $1.5 billion to retrofit Gerald Gentleman Station, an old, dirty, and increasingly expensive coalfired power plant.

This investment will be financed by you, Nebraska's ratepayers.

Your money will be spent to install new equipment. The Environmental Protection Agency has finalized a new set of rules that will place limits on the amount of pollutants each coalfired power plant is allowed to release. Right now, these are standards that NPPD does not meet.

With the encouragement of a handful of concerned Nebraska residents and groups such as the Center for Rural Affairs, Nebraska Farmers Union, and the Nebraska Wildlife Federation, NPPD agreed to host a series of open house sessions to help the public better understand the situation at hand. These "Behind the Outlet" sessions were educational in nature, allowing citizens to learn more about our electric system and ask questions in the process.

Unfortunately, NPPD used this opportunity to furnish information that many consider incomplete and misleading. Their attempt to provide fair, unbiased information fell short.

One example stands out. NPPD's wind station featured a large poster claiming that replacing power generated by Gerald Gentleman with increased wind generation, which many Nebraskans agree would be a boon to our local economy, would cost $4 billion. This number was presented as a contrast to the $1.5 billion required to bring Gerald Gentleman into compliance.

That number, $4 billion, assumes that NPPD would build and own the wind facilities necessary to generate power.

In reality, NPPD hasn't done this for some time. It doesn't intend to start. NPPD's misleading decision to quote numbers from an outdated model unfairly casts wind power as more costly, and more risky, than it actually is.

When NPPD uses wind power as part of its generation portfolio it does so by buying power from a developer. In fact, only 16 percent of the wind energy that NPPD will use in 2013 will be generated by a facility owned by the utility. NPPD hasn't built a wind farm since 2005. All wind power added in the last seven years has been purchased from a developer.

When it comes to wind energy and NPPD, someone else takes the risk, secures the land, builds the turbine, finds a customer.

NPPD only buys the output from these wind farms at a rate secured by a long-term contract with the facility owner. Each of these contracts almost always offers rates equal to, and in many cases lower, than what it costs NPPD to produce energy. This has proved to be a good deal for Nebraskans.

NPPD forgot to mention that wind power now sells for 3.5 to 4.5 cents per kilowatt hour, a cost competitive with coal. In wind-rich states such as Nebraska, this renewable resource can also lower the price you pay for electricity.

Introducing greater levels of wind energy into the grid would lower electricity bills by $65 to $200 each year.

NPPD forgot to mention that coal generation is becoming much more expensive, both here in Nebraska and elsewhere. These increasing costs have caused an astounding number of utilities to move beyond coal, opting instead for cleaner and more cost effective resources. The share of U.S. electricity generated by coalfired power plants is expected to fall below 40 percent this year, the lowest level since 1949. Analysts expect this number to fall further, to below 30 percent, by 2020.

The open house sessions may have passed, but your chance to speak out hasn't. Don't forget it's time to hold NPPD officials accountable.

-- Johnathan Hladik is Energy Policy Advocate for the Center for Rural Affairs in Lyons, Nebraska

View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • The dangers from nuc plants are just to great we need to develope other sources of sustainable energy including solar! Dozens of mutated butterflies have been found near Japan's Fukushima nuclear site, sparking concerns that radiation released during last year's nuclear accident could affect other species. Many of the affected insects exhibited abnormalities in their antennae, abdomens and legs, according to a new study published in Nature's online journal Scientific Reports."It's pretty clear that something has gone wrong with the ecosystem."The study began just two months after the March 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant.Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/attack-mutant-butterflies-radiation-fukush...

    -- Posted by Exaver on Fri, Aug 17, 2012, at 9:49 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: