Few arguments on need to cut deer population

Friday, February 3, 2012

Hunting is getting a lot of attention in the Legislature this session, with committees considering a bill to allow hunting of mountain lions, one to allow farmers to kill one antlerless deer for every $1,000 in crop damage caused by deer and another bill to create a deer donation program to help feed low-income Nebraskans and prison inmates.

Another measure would make the right to hunt, fish and trap part of the Nebraska Constitution, if approved by voters.

The latter is a reaction to potential threats from animal rights groups as more and more of the state's population shifts from the countryside to the cities.

Mountain lion sightings have gone from being dismissed by authorities to front page news, with the appearance of the animals in places like Kearney neighborhoods and points east, but they are still rare enough a hunting season hardly seems warranted.

Deer are another matter, with the average Nebraska driver having a 1 in 109 chance of hitting a deer, according to American Family Insurance.

That translates into thousands of deer collisions a year, millions of dollars in damage, and probably doesn't count the number of deer which are hit and killed and never get reported.

Car and truck drivers won't argue with any measure that would help reduce the number of deer that stray into their paths. Neither will farmers and ranchers in some parts of the state, where deer eat or destroy thousands of dollars in crops every year.

Nor will wildlife management officials who see an association between deer overpopulation and disease.

Sen. Tony Fulton of Lincoln has sponsored legislation that would create a large-scale program that allows hunters to donate deer meat to feed needy Nebraskans and prisoners.

Hunters would be asked to give part of their permit fees to the Hunters Helping the Hungry Cash Fund, which would be added to other donations to reimburse meat processors who would get the meat ready for consumption to needy Nebraskans and prisoners.

While ranchers, sportsmen, a homeless shelter director and meat processor all testified in favor of the measure, a Game and Parks Commission official noted that the agency already has a deer exchange that costs the state nothing.

A processor, however, said he lost 50 cents to $1.50 per pound for deer he processes for the program, and the paperwork is cumbersome.

We should always be reluctant to start a new program without solid indications that it will accomplish its intent efficiently.

But an overabundance of protein, people willing to harvest, process and distribute it to people who need it, seems like a good combination.

View 9 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • The cold, hard truth may be that nothing will move forward until it affects Omaha. I don't mean to sound cynical, but that seems to be the M.O.

    -- Posted by speak-e-z on Fri, Feb 3, 2012, at 2:30 PM
  • It would help if the farmers that have land along the highways to let hunters in to take out the does and the ones with crop damage do the same. There is alot of guys with young sons and daughters that would like a place for the kids to get a chance to shoot their first deer.

    -- Posted by rifleman on Fri, Feb 3, 2012, at 4:07 PM
  • The doe population really must be brought down to manageable levels, which at this time, they are not. There are a lot of people who would love to fill their freezers with venison, let them. Maybe even force the out of state hunters do the same.

    -- Posted by Dudley Dawson on Fri, Feb 3, 2012, at 4:24 PM
  • Bring back the Jacob family Wisconsin hunters.

    -- Posted by BuffRoam on Sat, Feb 4, 2012, at 1:19 PM
  • Right, they'll thin 'em down!

    -- Posted by Dudley Dawson on Sat, Feb 4, 2012, at 8:21 PM
  • Thin out the deer and stock some antelope.

    -- Posted by dennis on Sun, Feb 5, 2012, at 11:17 AM
  • The problem with your Jacobs solution is that they were trophy poachers...not doe hunters for which the article emphasizes the need. There are good people who can do the job if some of the red tape is lifted. dennis, I like your antelope idea. I have heard them called foul names where they are plentiful, however, as they are just as hard on fences and cars. One even went so far as to label them "range maggots".

    -- Posted by speak-e-z on Mon, Feb 6, 2012, at 4:09 PM
  • Speak-e-z, agree with your assessment on antelope however they are more in the pasture land and deer in the fields.

    -- Posted by dennis on Mon, Feb 6, 2012, at 4:39 PM
  • Cutting down on permit fees would help. Also, more bonus tags on permits. I remember when seeing a group of 10 deer seemed to be rather large. Now it is nothing to see 30-50 in a group. Lengthen seasons as well.

    -- Posted by carlsonl on Mon, Feb 6, 2012, at 5:48 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: