Editorial

Population decline slowing, but jobs effort must continue

Monday, December 19, 2011

The bad news, people continue to leave Red Willow County. The good news is, the loss is slowed and it's better than the many other parts of the state.

As you may have suspected, Lancaster County showed the most gains, according to 2000-2009 IRS data analyzed by the Center for Public Affairs Research at the University of Nebraska Omaha. Lincoln and Omaha always had net inmigration from other Nebraska counties over the period, but while Lincoln's rate has declined over the past two years, Douglas County's improved. One big change was the moving of the Gallup Organization headquarters from Lincoln to Omaha.

But rural counties are benefiting from relatively high commodity prices and a smaller rise in unemployment rates, making them more attractive economically and at least temporarily slowing the decades-long outmigration trend, according to the UNO researchers.

In fact, Nebraska counties with at least 10,000 residents had their second best net movement in the past 10 years in 2009. Hall County gained 80 residents from other Nebraska counties, below an increase of about 180 in the prior year, but those were the only times in the past 10 years that had net inmigration. Scotts Bluff County gained an even 100 percent from other Nebraska counties, slightly below a similar increase in the prior years.

Red Willow County, as well as Colfax and Dawson, each had a net outmigration to other Nebraska areas, but the amount of loss was the second smallest in the past 10 years, according to the IRS data.

While that data doesn't include demographic information, the researchers did note that many of the state's performing relatively well in 2009 shared the common characteristic of having a sizeable Hispanic/Latino presence.

The report used Red Willow County "as a good example of the trend of migration improvement. While Red Willow County has lost residents to other Nebraska areas each of the past 10 years, the loss averaged 92 persons per year during the first eight years before slowing to losses of only 7 and 22 people in 2008 and 2009 respectively."

Nearby Lincoln County, in contrast, had its worst intrastate movement in the past 10 years in 2009, down 67. Four years earlier, in 2005, Lincoln County had a net gain of nearly 250 people from other Nebraska locations.

There's no one factor to credit for the "decline in the decline" of population, just as there's no one factor that should get the credit. Unfortunately, much of the growth of trade areas has come at the expense of the smaller areas they serve.

But past efforts to bring industries like Valmont and Parker Hannifin to McCook have certainly helped diversify employment opportunities, as have the building of ethanol plants in the area, along with the boost in corn prices. McCook's role as a trade center continues to work in our favor, as do "traditional" employers such as the railroad, health care services, schools, college and retail stores.

But if we are to keep the economic center of Nebraska from slipping more and more toward the Interstate 80 corridor on through Lincoln and Omaha, we must keep up the effort to make Southwest Nebraska as vibrant and attractive as possible.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • The high farm prices are a double edge sword. Less operators are retiring due to the high prices leaving less ground for prospective young farmers to be able to farm. I don't have any doubts that this will lead to the death of the family farm.

    -- Posted by plainsman on Mon, Dec 19, 2011, at 1:40 PM
  • plainsman;

    I see it pretty much the same way that you do.

    I know many people believe the high price of farm land is being driven solely by the demand for the crop which allows the price to fluctuate accordingly, I don't know if this is always true.

    Recent articles in the media indicate that some investors pulled their money out of the stock market and invested it in agriculture land which they considered a safe haven by having a lower risk of being subject to stock fluctuations. The value of the crop and the land is now being bought sometimes just for the purpose of having a safe place to keep your investment money until financial situations return to more normal anticipations. As is, the stock market can fluctuate 200 to 400 points in any given day -- you have to have a crystal ball and some real good luck to outsmart those kinds of swings in value.

    I also wonder if the bio-fuels industry isn't playing a role. If any of the proposed legislation for constructing a nationwide collection system for ethanol and bio-diesel ever come to be, what kind of impact would that have on the price of the farm land? Which is more valuable -- an oil well with no connecting pipeline or an oil well connected to a nationwide pipeline collection system? The farm subsidy programs even provide some safety nets to lessen the risk. The collection system would be eligible for Federal Government Loan guarantees for up to 80% of the total cost. I could easily see this happening once the economy gains a little more steam -- or even as a possible jobs program.

    It use to be that those on the farm would save up a little money and invest it in the stock market -- now the stock market is investing in the farm. The tables have turned.

    -- Posted by Geezer on Thu, Dec 22, 2011, at 8:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: