Editorial

Will plain language help us understand government?

Thursday, May 19, 2011

We remember the advice of a seventh-grade science teacher. Instead of "I heated up the beaker on the bunsen burner," we were supposed to write "the beaker was heated on the bunsen burner." Nice and passive, and boring verbiage for our lab report.

Journalism school reversed all that; back to active, subject-verb-object sentences written to an eighth-grade level. We were often at odds with English professors who preferred more flowerly language.

Working journalists constantly fight the temptation to pass along verbatim government jargon that seems designed to intimidate or distract if not outright confuse.

Last fall, President Obama signed the Plain Writing Act, which will take full effect in October, requiring federal agencies to start writing plainly in all new or substantially revised documents produced for the public.

It's about time.

As the Associated Press described it, "pursuant to regulations promulgated thereunder and commencing in accordance with a statute signed herein by President Barack Obama, the government shall be precluded from writing the pompous gibberish heretofore evidenced, to the extent practicable."

That sentence contained 11 terms that won't be allowed under the new system.

The changes have roots back in the Clinton administration, when Vice President Al Gore's "reinventing government" effort enlisted Annetta Cheek, now chairwoman of the Center for Plain Language and one of the authors of the government's new guidelines.

Bureaucratic writing tends to be vague and officious because federal employees tend to write with their bosses and agency lawyers in mind, not the public, she said.

It's just like that seventh grader, writing for the teacher rather than his peers.

We have used grammar-checking word-processing software which "grades" our writing according its complexity; there's probably some available for government writers that includes a "BS-o-meter."

The Plain Writing Act may have effects far beyond what even its authors have expected.

Who knows, once the act is fully implemented, maybe we citizens will actually be able to tell what the government is doing.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    "pursuant to regulations promulgated thereunder and commencing in accordance with a statute signed herein by President Barack Obama, the government shall be precluded from writing the pompous gibberish heretofore evidenced, to the extent practicable."

    ---Because of a law signed by President Obama, the government will no longer be allowed to use uncommon words when writing and or creating future documents---

    Am I reading that right...;-)

    It should also save a lot of paper, ink, and time, thus cutting cost, and possibly a job or two here and there.

    -- Posted by cplcac on Fri, May 20, 2011, at 1:47 AM
  • Ahh, Newspeak, finally for the dumbmasses. No need for superfluous words. In fact, lets start getting rid of words with vague meanings and those with meanings that are similar in nature. No need for verbs either when nouns will do the trick. We shall have an A, B, and C vocabulary. Something even the Proles can understand! This is double plus good. Heretofore, insomuchas, wherein, and thusly we shall all live life to the highest standards that government can provide! Bah!

    -- Posted by speak-e-z on Fri, May 20, 2011, at 2:45 PM
  • *

    lol @ Speak-e-z. :-)

    -- Posted by cplcac on Sat, May 21, 2011, at 1:14 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: