Editorial

Basic economics govern growth of new industry

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Washington is decrying businesses for building cash reserves instead of hiring new workers in response to an improving economy, but Nebraska's recent experience provides a better lesson on basic economics.

Businesses are in the business of making money. Government's best role is to leave those businesses alone to do their jobs, and penalize them as little as possible through restrictions and taxes that serve as a penalty for doing their jobs well.

Gov. Dave Heineman's office announced Tuesday that the revamped state incentive program, Nebraska Advantage, had 55 applications last year from companies promising to invest $357 million and create 3,800 jobs in return for tax breaks.

The announcement was also a shot across the bow of the Legislature, which will be tempted to raise taxes to balance the budget in the face of a looming deficit.

Many states are recruiting businesses from Illinois, which last month approved increasing the personal income tax rate from 3 to 5 percent and the corporate tax rate from 4.8 to 7 percent.

"Every time you increase taxes, it's a job killer," Heineman said.

Unfortunately, half of the applications came from projects in Lincoln or Omaha, with the rest spread out across the state. Thirty-three were for financial or insurance companies, 34 from renewable fuels or medical firms and 60 from telecommunications or business services.

As good as special incentives are, they are no substitute for the nurturing of a long-term business environment.

Grand Island learned that with its recent experience with a plant to produce concrete ties for the Union Pacific railroad.

The CXT company landed a new contract with the railroad, but needed $10 million to buy a 50-ton gantry crane and other upgrades to meet the demand for a million railroad ties a year to rebuild rail lines from Los Angeles to El Paso and another from Salt Lake City to Chicago.

Grand Island invested $200,000 in Local Option Municipal Economic Development Program funds into CXT, including $100,000 as an outright grant for infrastructure and $100,000 as a forgivable loan tied to job creation.

CXT did, indeed, meet its obligations to the city, but when U.P. let its contract with the company expire, it was announced that the plant would close and its equipment taken to other plants such as Tucson.

That leaves 70 direct employees and others working for sand and gravel operations supplying CXT with aggregate out in the dark.

Yes, we should do everything to encourage the businesses that provide the jobs we desperately need. But real growth, and real economic development unencumbered by government bureaucracy is the answer.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Private enterprise is not always successful in their endeavors -- but this does not necessarily equate to government entities being the cause of their failure.

    Many of the innovations we use on a daily basis were developed utilizing government programs and later were adopted into private businesses in the form of spin-off industries.

    A good example is GPS (Global Positioning System) originally developed by the military in 1972 and not released for private use until the Russians shot down a private airliner KAL 007 in 1983 - because it had unintentionally entered Russian Air Space due to a navigation error. Then President Reagan, announced it would be available to private industry once the system was fully implemented.

    GPS has revolutionized many industries and will continue to play a vital role for many years to come.

    I think it is a little naive to think our country would have the advancements in technology we take for granted if the Government had not played a key role in their development.

    -- Posted by Geezer on Wed, Feb 16, 2011, at 8:19 PM
  • Indeed Geezer,you could start with the Transcontinental railroad and the telegraph system that accompanied it , then step to the network by which we read this paper and comment, originally a Defense Department (DARPA)project.Even the aviation industry which you cite was largely developed,starting with the Wright brothers through government financing in the form of military contracts.The blanket statement about any tax increase being a "job killer" neglects the impact of how the revenue accrued is spent.

    One suspects Tucson lured those jobs by means of Government tax abatements or other such incentives.

    -- Posted by davis_x_machina on Mon, Feb 21, 2011, at 8:40 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: