Editorial

EAS targeted for cuts

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Twelve times a week, McCook residents hear the roar of a turboprop airliner operated by Great Lakes as it drops into McCook Ben Nelson Regional Airport and picks up passengers for flights to destinations around the world.

If Sen. John McCain and a group of conservative lawmakers in the House have their way, the Southwest Nebraska skies will be quieter.

That's because they are proposing elimination of the Essential Air Service program that subsidizes airlines to serve small airports like McCook.

As of June 1, 2010, the program paid as much as $5,223 per passenger in Ely, Nevada, and as little as $9.21 per passenger in Thief River Falls, Minnesota.

We don't know the current level -- it would be in the $3,000 per passenger range using 2006 emplanement numbers -- but an order issued last June pays the airline $1.796 million a year to serve McCook, or $1,464 per eligible flight or a maximum of $35,000 a week.

Opponents want to eliminate the $200 million for the program as they scramble to find ways to reduce the federal deficit. Supporters such as the airport's namesake, Sen. Ben Nelson, plus Sens. Mark Begich of Alaska, Robert Casey of Pennsylvania and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, are circulating a letter urging McCain to give up the effort to kill the program because of the economic consequences it could have.

"Eliminating the program will have a devastating impact on th economies of rural communities," the letter said.

"At a moment when the nation's economic recovery is starting to gain momentum, it makes little sense to reduce personal and business travel volume by cutting off residents of rural areas," the letter continues. "And at a time when jobs are already so hard to come by in our rural communities, it makes even less sense to enact cuts that will only make the problem worse."

Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia is one of EAS's biggest supporters the main sponsor of the pending aviation bill which would increase rather than decrease funding and give the Transportation Department more flexibility in structuring contracts with airlines to improve it, including adjusting contracts to take fuel costs into account.

Southwest Nebraskans want to see the federal deficit reduced as much as anyone, and $200 million would be a small step toward that goal. But are we willing to give up service that may be essential to retaining and attracting industries vital to our economic future?

Let our senators and congressmen know.

Comments
View 9 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Elimination of the commercial air service and the funding could also eliminate the many federal dollars that are spent in McCook to upgrade the airport, thus hurting those that have private planes.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Feb 3, 2011, at 4:04 PM
  • I expected to hear from the tea party on this one. Since they are not here allow me to respond.

    The airport cannot survive with out government money, it should be shut down. Thank you

    -- Posted by president obama on Thu, Feb 3, 2011, at 6:16 PM
  • McCook is very fortunate to have the quality Airport Facilities they now have. Not only is it a benefit for potential long term economic growth, it also provides an ideal location to base support needs of the community should a natural disaster impact this area of the state. This did not happen by chance, long term planning efforts were implemented years ago to arrive with the facility we now take for granted.

    The mere fact that the airport is built to aviation standards that allow commercial flights is an extraordinary achievement for a community the size of McCook. We need to say thanks to all those that had the foresight to make that happen, and do our best to keep their vision for the community going forward in tough financial times. We at least owe them that much.

    -- Posted by Geezer on Fri, Feb 4, 2011, at 10:44 AM
  • I guess it ends with the shutdown of the airport in mccook obvious. Wouldent you say? Stop borrowning money and shut it down. Cmon, lets show the government that we dont need their money.

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Feb 4, 2011, at 6:35 PM
  • bigdawg

    Don't you think that a little time should be allowed to assess the options that may be available to address this issue? It has only been one month since the business tax incentives were passed in the 111th Congress. There may be opportunities now to attract business ventures to locate at the Airport Facility -- 100% expensing for business entities should brighten the outlook somewhat.

    -- Posted by Geezer on Fri, Feb 4, 2011, at 7:24 PM
  • Yes geezer, im being sarcastic.

    -- Posted by president obama on Sat, Feb 5, 2011, at 7:40 AM
  • bigdawg

    Sorry about that!!

    -- Posted by Geezer on Sat, Feb 5, 2011, at 12:41 PM
  • I'm all for the service as long as the cities that benefit are actually trying to get people to visit.

    What is the typical passenger count for each flight into and out of McCook? And has it really grown over the years?

    If were only flying empty or nearly empty planes to McCook, whats the point?

    -- Posted by npwinder on Sat, Feb 5, 2011, at 6:40 PM
  • What impact does the new national guard facilities at the airport have on the desire to receive federal funding to maintain standards?

    -- Posted by BuffRoam on Sun, Feb 6, 2011, at 3:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: