Editorial

Horror stories from moving legals to the web

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

While the Legislature considers proposals that could move legal notices to the Internet, results of a survey by the national Public Notice Resource Center should be taken into account:

* Only 66 percent of all Americans 18 and over use the Internet.

* Only 50 percent of African-Americans use the Internet.

* Only 45 percent of Hispanic-Americans over the age of 65 use the Internet.

* Only 15 percent of Americans visit a government web site on the average day.

* Some 89 percent of the U.S. adult population did not view a government web site yesterday.

* And more than 40 percent of Americans have never visited a government web site.

A recent survey in Wisconsin, with more than 500 respondents, found that government web sites receive relatively little traffic. About 37 percent said they never read information on government web sites, 15 percent said they did so once a year and 8 percent several times a year. On the other hand, 82 percent of those in Wisconsin read a paper once a week.

And there is anecdotal evidence as well:

* In a northeastern U.S. town, after the town switched to Internet legals, the city clerk neglected to renew their URL, the site was eventually unplugged and all of the legal notices evaporated. Talk about a legal morass!

* In 2008, the Utah Legislature passed a law requiring all government entities to post all legal notices on the state-run web site. As one clerk noted, the site was very slow and took up to an hour to load an agenda -- causing some people to give up altogether.

* In Madison, Wisconsin, the school district put its legal notices online before sending them to the newspaper. Someone read them on the web and complained to the school administrator, who then pulled the notice from the web site before it went to the newspaper. After the newspaper found out the school was doctoring up its legal business, it published the original notice as it should have been published in the first place.

* In Lovell, Wyoming, the city was sued because it alleged that city officials had falsified some historic public records on a zoning issue 20 years prior. The plaintiff discovered the falsification in the original public record published in the local newspaper. The city was forced to pass a new ordinance and properly publish it in the local newspaper.

Again, we have to conclude, when it comes to a long-lasting, legal document, nothing can replace hard-copy, ink on paper.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • What about the crowd that never reads a hard copy of the newspaper?

    for the evidence:,

    #1 If they had backed up their files, not all was lost, Once the URL was renewed, upload the files and back in business. Or they could set a few reminders as to when to pay their bills. Also if the URL is registered with a site seperate from the host (IE, URL is purchased through godaddy, and site hosted with bluehost) All they would have to do is renew the url with godaddy, and they should be back in business.

    #2 Update the server your uploading to or users are downloading from. If the site is hosted by a third party, find a new one. Maybe there's an issue of still using dial up. If a site taking too long, someone somewhere is being cheap.

    #3 This speaks more about the ethics of a school administrator than it does with posting legals online. If they're willing to take it from the site, what's stopping them from not submitting to the paper to begin with?

    #4 And if they were online, maybe the plaintiff would have read them there.

    With newspaper subscription rates declining in the US. Posting legals online is a great idea. If they're not, people, like me, without a subscription will not have access to them. Sure there can be issues to contend with. We were given 3 examples of where switching online had failed. How many place have made the switch without incident?

    As for the poll of how few people visit a government website, How many government websites are actually worth visiting everyday?

    -- Posted by npwinder on Thu, Jan 27, 2011, at 10:54 PM
  • *

    The fact that many government sites scan your cookies to see where else you have been. May also be a factor in peoples hesitance to go.

    -- Posted by Damu on Tue, Feb 1, 2011, at 2:00 PM
  • Makes me want to toss my cookies, frankly.

    -- Posted by bjo on Wed, Feb 2, 2011, at 9:39 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: