Letter to the Editor

Whack TSA, leash-holder with big stick

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Dear Editor,

America, the time is come to exercise a check on federal power. Not by the ballot, but by the club. It is time to throw a national "blanket party" for federal agencies that make "molestation" of the Constitution in general -- and the fourth Amendment in particular -- their new Standard Operating Procedure. It is time for the "Big Stick."

What is security without liberty? In "keeping America safe" the federal government aggressively deprives we citizens of our personal freedoms and dignity. Cattle destined for slaughter are "kept safe" -- Are we cattle? Government policies notwithstanding, Americans are free individuals, endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights; however, "irradiation" and "molestation" are not on the list. A free people do not tolerate overt acts of tyranny, and our founders thought it better to sacrifice their lives rather than surrender freedom. We Americans have "walked softly" for too long. We have waxed complacent, apathetic and apologetic to our tyrants. "We the Abused" now act as a nation afflicted by the Stockholm syndrome--but it is time to end our victimization. It is time to take out the "big stick," and thump a bump on the stump of those who tread upon us.

This observation is not limited to federal TSA thugs who raise physical molestation to a "procedural art form."

But the arrogance and hostility that these agencies and their officers display against our protests of unwarranted violation is becoming the national norm -- and, worse, tyranny is becoming "accepted" by many Americans.

The result is that a hard indifference to constitutional protections and established forms of civility is spilling over into government at every level, from Governor to municipal dog catcher -- we are enabling our molesters.

Incontrovertible evidence proves the federal government's latest aggression is based not on the realities of war, but on a doctrine that despises reason: holding the American citizen a threat, while providing unlimited access, domestic comfort and constitutional protections to our enemies. That the principle cause for our misery -- the Muslim -- is excluded from the "assault and battery" now perpetrated against the American traveler -- from the infant to the elderly, from the healthy to the infirm and disabled, proves the object of federal power is not the preservation of American life and property, nor the defense of our nation. No. The "end game" in this expanding scope of intimidation is the elevation of the state, by the State and for the state. Liberty is being "molested" and systematically "stripped" of her essential garments. Our personal violation is but a symptom of the Progressive rape that has gone unabated for 100 years.

That our enemy is allowed to conduct their own "self screening" proves that those who govern by agency are void of any saving virtue, and thus must be immediately removed from their appointed office--or We the People will perish.

Tyranny is a monster that grows exponentially with appeasement. The "soft" tyranny of today will metastasize into the "hard" variety tomorrow. Like the iceberg that sank the "unsinkable" RMS Titanic, the deadly portion we do not see -- the stuff waiting its national "debut" -- lies just beneath the surface, deceivingly silent, but no less cold, hard and brutal in its capability to inflict devastating damage.

Apathy guarantees our collision with disaster, and the "rudder" of our ship of state -- that's you and me still appears too small to affect a desperately needed change in course. The recent election changed the crew --not the course. Time may tell differently, but radical action is ever more proving itself necessary now -- not after we hit the iceberg. Our "handlers" patiently wait to send the "unsinkable" USS Constitution to the bottom of the ocean's blackest depths; but if Columbia sinks beneath the waves, there will be no salvage operation capable of righting her.

Plan A: Our second greatest weapon is our wallets. To every person considering or having planned air travel during the Holidays -- cancel. This is a radical but required intervention. The ensuing firestorm will brand "impeachment" across the backside of every individual associated with these abominations. We will financially injure the air transportation industry, but it survived September 11, 2001 and the loss of revenue that followed in the wake of the national grounding--it will survive our boycott. Americans will thus send a more powerful message to Congress: rein in the tyrants, end the abuse from "Big Sister" Janet Napolitano and her cadre of TSA thugs or our "Big Stick" will grow. Plan B: Well, that involves our weapon of last resort the American citizen's "nuclear option" -- we are not there yet; but the possibility may lie just over the horizon if these tyrannical policies do not change PDQ.

Bruce Desautels

TEA Party Patriots

of SW Nebraska

View 46 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • You've got to be kidding me? You yourself sound like a tyrant, malitia men, off the chain and out of control. Don't you think you've gone a little far and unreasonable? If every did cancel their flights, airline's loss of revenue would only mean loss of jobs...many jobs. No, I don't like the screenings either and hopefully the TSA will be able to come up with a more reasonable way to do it. however the way you sound, you're off....way off.

    -- Posted by Rural Citizen on Tue, Nov 23, 2010, at 1:12 PM
  • No one is forcing you to fly

    -- Posted by president obama on Tue, Nov 23, 2010, at 8:31 PM
  • just wondering how much of that is Bruce, and how much if it is copyed and pasted from the tea party website?

    -- Posted by president obama on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 12:23 PM
  • *

    The posters above are correct. I for one am extremely excited for when a terrorist smuggles a bomb in one of their cavities. FULL CAVITY SEARCHES FOR EVERYONE! That way we can make sure we have the terrorists. I mean who cares if it's stomping all over our rights, as long as I feel safe in my imaginary security blanket that's all that matters.

    -- Posted by Damu on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 2:03 PM
  • *

    To Rural Citizen:

    You should have the courage to use your real name. You are eager to surrender our Constitution and our country to dictatorial fiat, just to preserve your own comfort. Materialism has made you a docile slave; so be it... "May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

    Benjamin Franklin warned the Americans of his day about individuals such as you: "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

    I worked aviation for 23 years, and by your remarks, it is easy to observe you have no clue. A few days of vacant airports will not cause airlines to lay-off their employees; **** union contracts! "Hopefully the TSA will come up with a better way" -- to separate we Americans from our liberties, while the real threats to our nation--Muslims---get the politically-correct frequent flyer treatment. Israel, a country in far greater peril from terrorism, uses profiling and interviews, with astonishingly positive results... but far be it from our government to actually target the enemy. I asked a rhetorical question of whether we are cattle... Thank you for your answer.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 6:15 PM
  • *

    To bigdawg:

    I have my own thoughts, thank you. If the words were that of another, then I would cite them. Perhaps you suffer from "projection"?

    You are correct in that "no one is forcing me to fly;" However, that is a straw man argument. The issue is not whether I am forced to fly against my will, but rather that I am forced to surrender ever increasing portions of my constitutionally guaranteed freedoms against my will.

    No one is "forcing me" to smoke, or to drink soda pop, or to enjoy a bag of potato chips and a candy bar... and none of these actions are immoral or unethical; yet the "nanny state" in all its high-brow "wisdom" is working overtime to deprive my CHOICE of whether to participate in those activities.

    They wish to protect me from my own existence! You must have your "shots" at birth; You must have a social security number; You must not smoke; You must not drive without buckling your safety belt; You must only drive a car that gets 'x' mpg; You must not ride a bicycle without wearing a helmet, etc.

    All these restrictions to "protect" my life... enforced by a government that legalized the murdering of children in the womb!

    Perhaps the government should require all citizens be sealed in a giant plastic box at birth, so to guarantee our "safe" existence! A prison 2000 miles deep by 3000 miles wide is still a prison. Remember: "A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have." -- President Gerald Ford.

    Tyrants always begin with small steps, so as not to arouse too much suspicion or resistance to their doing "what is best for us" and depriving us of our liberties "for our own good." The individual is gradually "trained" to accept his chains with gratitude!

    I would rather live a short life, happy as a free man, than live a hundred years in bondage.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 7:12 PM
  • In our oh-so politically correct society, whenever someone hears the word "profiling", their mind inserts the word "racial" before it.

    ....and RACIAL profiling IS wrong. Legally wrong, morally wrong, and almost entirely ineffective.

    BEHAVIORAL profiling, on the other hand, drills right down to the heart of the matter. And this is what the Israelis have been doing for decades, and having great success with.

    I'm not a fan of the "enhanced patdown". Not simply because it is extremely invasive, but because TSA, an agency of the government, does not appear to be bound by the same rules as the REST of the government. For a police officer to pat someone down, he must have a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime, AND that the person is armed and dangerous. There's no random assigned number that automatically authorizes a cop to pat someone down simply because they were unfortunate enough to draw it.

    No, peace officers have to first make a case for any search. And so should TSA.

    -- Posted by Owen McPhillips on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 8:30 PM
  • *

    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." -- William Pitt

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 11:31 PM
  • -- Posted by Damu on Wed, Nov 24, 2010, at 11:53 PM
  • *

    Very interesting that a man who makes a series of excellent, relevant and well opined statements for the purpose of lamenting freedoms in peril is accused of being over the top. I know Bruce personally and can attest that he writes like he speaks and thinks; he is genuine, sincere and definitely NOT a tyrant.

    Thank you Bruce. Happy Thanksgiving.

    -- Posted by Mickel on Thu, Nov 25, 2010, at 6:19 PM
  • -- Posted by Owen McPhillips on Thu, Nov 25, 2010, at 9:43 PM
  • not quite word for word bruce, but it seems some cut and past is going on here.


    Did you write this?

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Nov 26, 2010, at 11:22 AM
  • Well, pardon me for not responding to your posts, it seems that you post so often and ramble so much that I tend to skip over your posts.

    question 1 will it be too late

    answer, no

    question 2 how do i feel about being searched to get on a plane while illegals are comeing over our borders.

    answer, Im not sure what you are talking about. What does me being searched have to do with illegal immigration? Trying to put 2 and 2 together on that one.

    And yes, no one is forcing you to fly was my first thought upon reading bruces palgerized letter to the editor. You just giving him a pass says alot about you.

    i didnt say less revelant, just makes Bruce a liar. It seems those are his thoughts after he read them someplace else and regurtitaed them here. Plagerism is o.k. with you?

    What are the odds you think of everything you want to say about a subject and post it once rather then flooding the blogs with mind numbing garbage?

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Nov 26, 2010, at 1:16 PM
  • I wonder if Bruce had permission to plagerize a letter to the gazzette. I also wonder what their policy is when they find out. Perhaps the writer, the orginal writer, will care that his work has been stolen and passed of as someone elses work.

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Nov 26, 2010, at 2:01 PM
  • "I have my own thoughts, thank you. If the words were that of another, then I would cite them. Perhaps you suffer from "projection"?"

    hahaha, thats is funny.

    perhaps you suffer from plagerism. Please, just one ounce of honesty from you.

    Is projection where someone steals the intelluctual property of another individual, passes it off as his own, not once but twice, then someone catches them doing it? If thats the case then i guess im guilty.

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Nov 26, 2010, at 7:12 PM
  • *


    An interesting revelation of why they are pushing so hard for those machines.

    -- Posted by Damu on Fri, Nov 26, 2010, at 7:43 PM
  • damu, what would have been really cool was if you wrote that article here on this blog and told everyone it was your writing.

    -- Posted by president obama on Sat, Nov 27, 2010, at 5:43 PM
  • why waste you time debating these idiot? they have already drank the cool-aid!

    -- Posted by remington81 on Sat, Nov 27, 2010, at 7:26 PM
  • *

    @BD Personally, I think the words speak well enough for themselves that the reader doesn't need to believe they are coming directly from me. I also understand how google works.

    -- Posted by Damu on Sat, Nov 27, 2010, at 11:57 PM
  • Good, I was feeling a bit like socrates looking for a just man. It seems there is at least 1 on here.

    -- Posted by president obama on Sun, Nov 28, 2010, at 9:38 AM
  • LMAO at all of you. I just feel like people should stop taking everything to the extreme, get back down to basics and use common sense. Obviously, learning how to act like adults and show respect towards others' thoughts is first. I'm not saying ignore the situation, just find common ground, compromise for our betterment and protect one another without going overboard. And, Bruce, I do value my freedom of choice whether or not to use my real name. Kudos to you! It's my choice just like alot of other things in this life. I fight for what is right in my life and make my own decisions for the best of my family. There are more ways than your way.

    -- Posted by Rural Citizen on Tue, Nov 30, 2010, at 9:03 AM
  • *

    To bigdawg:

    Just to set the record straight. "Cut and Paste!"

    As I stated in my FIRST reply to you, sir... MY WORDS ARE MY WORDS. The Editor of the Gazette knows me personalty, and he knows how I write and what I believe. He has seen me speak at a few TEA Party gatherings. I do not need to "plagerize" from anyone.

    I wrote the piece, you cited, in Free Republic. My handle is TCH... It stands for my place of employment: "Timber Creek Homes", located in Stratton NE, where I live!

    Did it ever occur to you that most individuals on FR use a "handle" rather than their full name? And since my name is rather long, using TCH makes logging in a much easier task. Most at FR know of me from their Washington D.C. Convention, held during the March on D.C., September 12, 2009

    I await your apology.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Thu, Dec 2, 2010, at 1:06 AM
  • *

    To bigdawg:

    P.S. If you need further convincing, please go to FR and ping "VOR Lady" ... she is from eastern Nebraska and knows me personally. She will vouch for the fact that "TCH" and I are one in the same individual.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Thu, Dec 2, 2010, at 1:11 AM
  • *

    To bigdawg:

    P.S.S. If you still doubt, then go to FR, search "TCH" then click on my handle name... It will bring you to my page. That should remove all doubt.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Thu, Dec 2, 2010, at 1:28 AM
  • If that is you then I apoligize sir.

    -- Posted by president obama on Thu, Dec 2, 2010, at 12:27 PM
  • hey ocho,

    Why dont you write down everything you want to say on a piece of paper, then wait a few hours. Come back and read the blog and read what you wrote and write down more. The second time you read what you have written and decide you dont have anymore to add, post it on the blog.

    -- Posted by president obama on Thu, Dec 2, 2010, at 5:30 PM
  • Thats part of the problem. You post on here so often and ramble so much that no one reads what you type. For the most part I skip over it, and over it and over it. It would appear that Bruce is not plagerizing in his letter to the editor but that does not make him any less a whacko. Much like yourself. Now, go get your shoeshie box

    -- Posted by president obama on Thu, Dec 2, 2010, at 7:34 PM
  • I just want to add my 2 cents, I fly from Denver to New Orleans, and back every 2 weeks, with that said, it does give me a little comfort knowing that anyone in the line could be X-Rayed or Searched (Their choice)at any time, I went through the Xray machine on my trip down on sunday! Did it bother me? No because (correct me if I'm wrong Owen) the TSA who are peace officers are not looking to see who is carrying the biggest package, but who is carrying the most dangerous package! They are not a bunch of pervs looking to have a good time fondling you, they are simply doing their job and it is Your choice to be pat down and not Xrayed, so if you choose to be Pat down maybe that does infact make you the Pervert!!!!

    I for one do feel much more comfortable flying now than I did 6 months ago! There are crazies from all countries and walks of life and races, and with the security measures getting tougher it is a true comfort to know that if they want to bring a bomb on the plane they are going to have no choice but to stick it in their Butt, and then get "fondled"!!!!

    Kevin Manley

    -- Posted by kman on Fri, Dec 3, 2010, at 2:10 AM
  • *

    @Kman Are you excited for when that happens and the TSA decides they need t investigate your "cavities". I assume you will be fine, since you will feel so safe!

    -- Posted by Damu on Fri, Dec 3, 2010, at 9:10 AM
  • *

    To bigdawg:

    bd stated: "It would appear that Bruce is not plagerizing in his letter to the editor but that does not make him any less a whacko."

    It "would appear"? Correction: It IS the FACT of the matter. It is also the FACT of the matter that by your own admission any man who does not share your opinion is a "whacko." Sir, your "apology" truly rings hollow; for failing your attempt in branding me a plagiarist, you now apply the pejorative "whacko" to my character. It is a great stroke of luck for you that the slur is a falsehood.

    Allow me to point out a truism to you, Mr. "bigdawg,"...

    Men who, as a matter of principle, sacrifice the most, so to preserve liberty for those who typically deserve it the least, are oft the ones labeled such pejoratives.

    No doubt, had you lived during the birth of this nation, your scarcely informed intellect would have considered Patrick Henry and his compatriots to be "whacko."

    Perhaps, one day, you may have enough humility to demonstrate a touch of gratitude to those whom fear not to make their stand against the enemy at the gates. However, I believe it the more likely outcome that those of your color will be the first to befriend the enemy so that he takes you last... In closing this rude contest, I shall bluntly state that, on the magnificent stage of those things that wax greater than ourselves, I think you a rather "small" dawg, indeed.

    Good Day to you, Sir.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Fri, Dec 3, 2010, at 4:29 PM
  • *

    To "ochosinco":

    "I especially like how Bruce let you go on for a while! I am sure he got more satisfaction from it!"

    I thank you for your commentary in my defense.

    Truly, I took no pleasure in cleaning up the mess left by the little dog. My tardiness came as a result of my tending to more pressing issues.

    As you well know, while dogs do possess an acute flexibility, so that they may tend to their immediate "hygienic" needs, in the larger picture, they are incapable of cleaning up the piles of dung they leave in their haste to expel their scatological business upon the world.

    In consideration of the above stated unfortunate reality, and having a desire to limit toxic methane emissions (which some animal haters believe to be the primary cause of canine-induced global climate change), I felt obliged to do my part to "save the planet."

    My action was merely an unpleasant but necessary labor of charity.

    However, I will not be responsible to remove any remnants of egg. That task does not fit within my job description.

    -- Posted by Bruce Desautels on Fri, Dec 3, 2010, at 5:14 PM
  • wacko

    -- Posted by president obama on Fri, Dec 3, 2010, at 6:01 PM
  • @Damu,

    That is the whole reasoning behind the X-Ray is so they can see in the cavity without searching! It's radicals like you (who may or may not fly) that are making a Mountain out of a Mole hill!!!! And I would never refuse the X-ray so there for there is no need to do a cavity search! I dont feel that they are taking away my rights I believe they are just trying to make America a better and safer place, after all when the Police sets up a DUI checkpoint they stop all vehicles and check to see if there are any open containers or drunk drivers ( I know how dare them, to think they can search my car that was bought and paid for by me) but tell me is that the government taking our rights away? My opinion is No due to the fact that they are out there protecting us citizens just as the TSA is!

    Just an opinion because that is my right to excersize!

    Kevin Manley

    -- Posted by kman on Fri, Dec 3, 2010, at 10:12 PM
  • Ochosinco, perhaps there should be "the rest of the story" on your latest post.

    The practice of flying the Speaker of the House on Air Force jets was first started after the 9/11 attacks. Then Speaker Dennis Hastert, Republican, of Illinois was flown home in commuter size jets, to Illinois, non-stop from D.C. (This type of jet does not have the fuel capacity to make a non-stop flight from D.C to California)

    When Mrs. Pelosi became Speaker, the Sgt.at Arms, a Mr. Bill Livingston ordered the plane for Pelosi. Not Pelosi.

    Mr. Livingston said because Pelosi lives in California he was compelled "to request an aircraft of making non-stop flights for security purposes, unless such aircraft is unavailable, this will ensure communications capabilities and also enhance security."

    The Bush White House defended Pelosi on this matter. "This is a silly story, and I think it's been unfair to the speaker." White House spokesman Tony Snow said.

    I am sure that the practice will continue for the incoming (in Jan.) new Speaker from Ohio.

    And what does your post about the current speaker have to do with TSA pat downs? Just wondering.

    I am not a Pelosi fan don't agree with her politics, but your jab at the speaker, I feel as Tony Snow put it was "silly and unfair."

    "Just sayin."

    -- Posted by goarmy67 on Sat, Dec 4, 2010, at 2:14 PM
  • The planes used are Air Force Planes, military versions of commerical planes, from the article I read the largest used for non stop flights for the speaker is a C-32A, better known as a Boeing 757, Wikipedia says while it is a large plane, it is a narrow bodied plane and is not considered a "Jumbo" jet. It was developed to replace the 727 tri-jet.

    I guess you do not remember that the speaker of the house is 2nd in line to become President if something should happen to the President and Vice President. As for the reason that the Bush administration felt a need for security purposes to protect the 2nd in line to be President you need to talk to whoever made that decision during the Bush years. As far as I am concerned it would be a security issue that probably should have been addressed before 9/11.

    I guess you have inside knowlege as to the accomodations on Air Force planes, as far as the ones I traveled on, I never say a bar, and sure as hell never saw a well equipped one.

    In my old Webster the definition of inference is:

    "The act of passing from one proposition, statement or judgement considered true to another whose truth is believed to follow from that of the former."

    So I guess I felt that your statement of the speaker's "Personal Jumbo jet" was less than truthful and at best half assed. So guess I infer your statement was unthruthful. By the way the flap over the plane is old news and has not been a "story" since about 2004. After the Bush White House sided with the speaker it became old news.

    You, Mr. or Ms. ochosinco need some new and updated material.

    Guess we will see what the "socialists" will put the new speaker in. Now I am inferring this, from reports from numberous news organizations, Mr. Boehner will in deed want a "well-equipped bar."

    -- Posted by goarmy67 on Sat, Dec 4, 2010, at 3:54 PM
  • Oh, PS, just sayin.

    -- Posted by goarmy67 on Sat, Dec 4, 2010, at 3:55 PM
  • While I'm not sure if the "entire" nation will be breathing a sigh of relief, after all she was re-elected in Nov. from the 8th District of California, so she must have some support.....but for sure not around here!

    But dear ochosinco if you must post at least get the facts straight, the new 112th Congress will run from Jan. 3, 2011 until Jan.3 2013.

    Not Jan. 1, 2011.

    Just sayin.................

    -- Posted by goarmy67 on Sun, Dec 5, 2010, at 12:13 AM
  • *

    @kman Perhaps you should do a bit more research friend. Backscatter xrays, the ones used currently in the airport cause photons to "back scatter" from what the rays are pointed at. These are non penetrative rays. If they were doing it the other way everyone would be wearing lead vests.

    -- Posted by Damu on Sun, Dec 5, 2010, at 1:39 AM
  • I was Just stating that I who flies on a major airline every 2 weeks have no problem with the security measures in place! and I talk to alot of other travelers who also have no problem with them it seems that about the only people that have a problem with it are certain tea party enthusiast who dont even travel much via airline! ( not saying that you dont travel), with that said it is unfortunate that alot of the tea party supporters are speaking out in this way, I know alot of people that were interested in the tea party until many supporters like your selves have spoken out on many issues that have nothing to do with them! just because they misconstrue security interest as a loss of rights, they are not taking away our rights after all if you dont like the policy you still have the right to drive, take a bus, or even a train without as much security issues! Just to give you a little of my political stance I am one of those gun loving Christians that the current person in office spoke out about! so dont try to put me in that class of the population, I in no way support Mr. Obama!

    -- Posted by kman on Mon, Dec 6, 2010, at 10:36 AM
  • *

    I can't speak for everyone, currently though I don't align myself with the tea party. Becoming apart of a movement financed by two of the richest people seems somewhat counterproductive to me. Keep in mind this is only my opinion.

    I would probably classify myself as more libertarian than anything. Many of my views line up with that way of ideological thinking.

    Sorry to hear you don't support the president. I'm curious though if that is because of their policies, or the letter beside their name? I'm also curious if you were in support of the previous president?

    Also, the majority of the nazis agreed with what the fuhrer was doing during the course of WW2. Does that mean that those policies were correct as well? Sometimes, you have to look at the bigger picture to see all that is going on.

    -- Posted by Damu on Mon, Dec 6, 2010, at 12:35 PM
  • So, Whats a better way to search for weapons that are illegal to take on airplanes?

    -- Posted by npwinder on Tue, Dec 7, 2010, at 1:29 PM
  • *

    Metal detector walk through is plenty in my opinion.

    -- Posted by Damu on Tue, Dec 7, 2010, at 6:36 PM
  • Metal Detectors don't catch underwear bombs.

    -- Posted by npwinder on Thu, Dec 9, 2010, at 12:41 PM
  • *

    Neither do backscatter xrays, or patdowns for the most part. When one of them comes through with an anal bomb, what do you suggest they do then?

    -- Posted by Damu on Thu, Dec 9, 2010, at 7:33 PM
  • http://netjets.com/


    Access more airports and don't need to go through TSA.

    -- Posted by npwinder on Thu, Dec 9, 2010, at 10:44 PM
  • You're my new hero, Mr. Winder.

    -- Posted by bjo on Fri, Dec 10, 2010, at 4:15 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: