Editorial

As the grocery store goes, so goes the town

Monday, November 8, 2010

Besides the struggle to keep a local school open, nothing illustrates the plight of small rural towns better than the loss of the local grocery story.

The Center for Rural Affairs advocacy group today released two reports that point out just how important those small grocery stores are, and what some people are doing to help them survive.

We've long denied being part of the pre-settlement "Great American Desert," but the Great Plains has been classified as having more "food deserts" than any other region in the country.

We have 418 counties where all the residents are 10 miles or more away from a full-service grocery store. Granted, 10 miles is nothing to a Sandhills rancher, but it is a serious issue for low income residents without access to transportation.

In Iowa, for example, the number of grocery stores with employees dropped by almost half from 1995 to 2005, from about 1,400 in 1995 to slightly more than 700 just 10 years later, according to the Center for Rural Affairs release. Not surprisingly, "supercenter" grocery stores increased by 175 percent in the 10 year period.

Rural grocery stories, besides providing a vital source of nutrition, also provide the jobs and tax revenue that support the community.

Losing a grocery store means residents have less access to healthy fresh fruits and vegetable, meaning the elderly may have to go for longer periods between visits to the store. Younger families are less likely to want to live in a community without a place to purchase food -- and buying food out of town is a hard habit to break.

"Many reasons conspire to leave a community without a grocery store," said Jon Bailey, author of the reports and director of rural research and analysis at the Center for Rural Affairs. "declining populations, out-commuting -- going to work and presumably shopping in other communities -- and aging ownership and lack of transfer opportunities may leave communities without a local store when owners retire or decide to leave their businesses."

According to Bailey's second report, rural communities without a grocery store have four basic ways to keep a grocery store's lights one -- community owned, cooperative, school based and the traditional independent retailer model. We have seen each of these tried in our area with varying success, and perhaps new models will emerge in the near future.

Yes, rural grocery stores and their communities face an uncertain future, Bailey said, "but we believe the future of these communities holds abundant promise if new economic models are encouraged and implemented."

By thinking outside the box -- and especially the big-box store -- rural communities can shape their own future.


Complete copies of the reports are available on the CRA website, http://www.cfra.org/

Comments
View 9 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Again, this report confirms the need for everyone to buy locally if at all possible. Support those that support OUR community!

    -- Posted by dennis on Mon, Nov 8, 2010, at 2:29 PM
  • *

    This report confirms the need for every small community with a local grocery to vote out any attempt by corporate giants to move in...that way you can avoid the local grocery the ability to stay in business in the first place. Just a thought.

    -- Posted by cplcac on Tue, Nov 9, 2010, at 3:23 AM
  • Amazing! All the concern for small rural communities after McCook just voted in NRD board members who seem intent on seriously harming the economic viability of hundreds of businesses in the outlying communities. Talk about "support those that support OUR community", you guys just kicked in the teeth of a lot of rural people outside of McCook.

    -- Posted by farmchick on Wed, Nov 10, 2010, at 7:49 PM
  • Buying locally is the best. And with purchasing services locally instead of out of area. Leave Lincoln and Omaha where they are at and not bring them here to do work that locals can take care of. I'm sure many would like to see that.

    -- Posted by edbru on Thu, Nov 11, 2010, at 11:46 AM
  • farmchick,

    With no disrespect intended, I don't believe that there was a good way to choose who to vote for so far as the NRD goes. Talk about politics. Every time a candidate would make a statement, there was someone else saying that it wasn't true. It got to the point that a voter couldn't make heads or tails out of what was being said.

    Ultimately, I personally only voted for 2 candidates as those were the only ones I could get any real answers out of. The entire campaign took on the persona of "The Good Ole Boys" network. It seemed to me that everyone running candidacy had a personal agenda and what works good for HIS farm in the sand hills didn't work well for the River Bottom Land Owning candidate, hence, a biased group of candidates.

    I personally believe in supporting Home Town, and in this part of the world Home Town is a combination of multiple communities lumped into 9 or 10 counties. I think it's an unfair statement to say that McCook looked after its own interests when the responsibility of facts should have been put on the shoulders of those running the electoral race.

    So far as water issues go..... I don't think things were clear for those which were not connected daily to the "agricultural" aspect of the issue. Murky water at best. As hard as I tried to understand all points of the issue, it just became more confusing the more I delved into it.

    Again, I mean no disrespect, I know that everyone has stake in the NRD..... just some more than others.

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Thu, Nov 11, 2010, at 12:49 PM
  • Nick ...Great job of telling it like it was before the electon and now a chance of fair treatment for all after the election and the end of whats best for me voting ... The kick in teeth comment is stupid comment after her neighborhood area farmers group of Jack Bond/and friends in dundy/chase county cheaters were caught red handed stealing water with a creative pipewelder on their payroll to show half use for years on meters . We just want fair treatment and some outside our area are not treating all fair and thats why they lost period.

    -- Posted by Cornwhisperer on Thu, Nov 11, 2010, at 1:47 PM
  • If the local business has the product and can compete on service and price sure it makes sense to purchase locally. If not, I'll take my money elsewhere.

    Business have to realize that their competition is no longer just in the city limits but within a couple hours drive and for some products a few days of shipping away.

    -- Posted by npwinder on Fri, Nov 12, 2010, at 2:13 PM
  • It's all fine and good to shop elsewhere until you have to get your heart medicine and it's just 2 days shipping away.

    Sure, you can have your eye glass prescription shipped right to your door. Whoops, the local optometrist had to close his doors and you need that sliver removed from your eye? Oh well, it's only a 2 hour drive.... sure it seems like 4 when you can only use 1 eye to drive. Hey, have your buddy drive you! What? He had to move away because he lost his job from lack of local business? Oh well. It's all worth it in the end if you consider the fact that you save pennies on the dollar to do your shopping elsewhere with people that don't know you, don't care to know you and frankly wouldn't care if you drove 2 hours, waited 2 days or just simply didn't do business with them at all.

    np...... where does YOUR paycheck come from? I'll bet you're one of those people that don't care about your customer's drive time, wait time or even if they exist.

    Obviously you haven't wrapped your head around the concept of monopolizing markets. The big get bigger and the small fade away. THEN, when the Big & Cheap have exhausted all of the consumer's other avenues to obtain their needs..... the 2 days shipping turns to a 3 to 5 day wait unless you want to pay for "Rush Delivery" on a product that they haven't realized a cost increase on but certainly don't take issue charging at full retail + the monopoly multiplier.

    It sounds like you take the local products and services for granted and as the saying goes: "You don't know what you've got, till it's gone."

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Fri, Nov 12, 2010, at 6:35 PM
  • Nick, I appreciate your comments and yes, some of us have more at stake but in small communities, we are all tied together and agriculture is our base. Rural Nebraska needs to stick together and work together. Irrigators were blamed for McCook's new water system and the recreational water levels. I don't believe there is any evidence that irrigation in the district's other counties had anything to do with your well field and I understood Red Willow res. was lowered to repair leaks. To hold pivot irrigators responsible makes about as much sense as blaming our irrigators for cheating that happened in another district. The NRD board was given 3 choices by the state. They chose the one that had the most flexibility thereby hurting the fewest people throughout the entire district. They were working on ways to help the people who would have been the most effected, and having the entire district participate in that help. It wasn't the choice that most directly benefited most of these board members, but it was the choice that shared the pain and the profit throughout the district. I sincerely hope that the new board members don't act rashly and harm a large segment of the district's economy.

    -- Posted by farmchick on Sun, Nov 14, 2010, at 8:11 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: