Editorial

Lower scores no surprise

Friday, October 22, 2010

The news isn't good, but we're not necessarily wringing our hands over Thursday's report that more Nebraska public schools failed to meet federal improvement standards last year than the year before.

According to a report from the Nebraska Department of Education, 61 of Nebraska's 1,200 schools needed improvement when judged by federal No Child Left Behind guidelines. That's nine more than the year before.

In math and reading, 42 schools are considered "persistently lowest achieving schools," judging by the federal benchmark, but that's an improvement over the 52 that made the list in May.

Why not worry?

The difference is, prior to 2009-10, Nebraska school districts created their own tests to measure No Child Left Behind and state compliance. In 2008-09, the last year we set our own standards, 93 percent met or exceeded standards in reading.

The new report showed 93 percent of students in grades 3-8 and 11 were proficient in math, up one percentage point from the previous year.

In reading, however, only 69 percent of students tested in those grades were found to be proficient, based on the state's first statewide, uniform reading tests, under a law passed by the Legislature.

It stands to reason we won't do as well if we are measured by higher standards.

But that doesn't mean we should pat ourselves on the back, either. The low scores make the districts eligible to apply for $6 million in federal school improvement grants.

Nebraska Education Commissioner Roger Breed said the schools could apply for plans like professional development, additional staffing and newer technology.

We'd like to see the money go toward additional class time, with fewer interruptions for peripheral activities.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I believe our federal government is on the wrong track with education just as it is on the wrong track with many programs. The feds "reward" failure by making more money available to those schools or individuals that fail and those that succeed are usually "punished" by higher taxes and more regulation.

    -- Posted by dennis on Fri, Oct 22, 2010, at 1:55 PM
  • Welcome to "social justice"! If you voted for Obama, you got what you expected. If my memory serves me, Dennis was in favor of the NeSA Testing process. This is just the beginning. More and more control is being transferred to the state via their Accountability process. The final "death nail" will be the national "Core Standards" that will transfer control to the federal government.

    -- Posted by Online on Sat, Oct 23, 2010, at 1:03 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: