Letter to the Editor

One-party district

Friday, September 10, 2010

Dear Editor,

I wish to respond to the opinion expressed in your Sept. 9 piece entitled "Independent Faces Uphill Battle."

Your paper stated that "a vote for the independent candidate, Dan Hill of Grand Island, will actually benefit the candidate farthest from the voter's preference."

This statement implies that voting for Dan Hill could actually get the Democratic candidate elected. As a practical matter, this is virtually impossible. Rebekah Davis, the Democrat, will receive approximately 18 percent of the vote.

I encourage you to study 3rd District voting patterns and apply what you learn to this specific race.

As a practical matter, ours is a one-party district. Republican candidates for every type of office generally get around 70 percent or more of the 3rd District vote.

This was the case in the last election in which Adrian Smith received 77 percent of the vote. There are rare and specific exceptions, like Ben Nelson, but in each case the Democrat was viewed as a conservative first and foremost. The primary election totals also provide a good indicator of what to expect in the general election. The Democratic candidate received 18 percent of the total vote in the primary election and that is why I believe she will receive that amount in the general election. In an election cycle in which Democrats are extremely unpopular it is unrealistic to think she could somehow do much better. That leaves approximately 82 percent to be split between the conservatives.

Some people also point to the 2006 race in which Scott Kleeb, a Democrat, got 45 percent of the vote. Kleeb was a particularly strong candidate who, like Ben Nelson, ran as a conservative more than a Democrat.

His campaign was also very well-funded and it was the Republicans who were unpopular in that election cycle.

If Kleeb were the Democratic candidate in this race, he would do better than Davis who lacks credentials and has little funding, but I doubt even he would muster over 25 percent representing the party of Nancy Pelosi and President Obama.

No Democrat would have a chance in this race, even if the vote were split between four or five candidates.

Dan Hill

Independent Candidate for Nebraska's 3rd District

Grand Island

View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Never underestimate your opponent.

    -- Posted by McCook1 on Fri, Sep 10, 2010, at 4:46 PM
  • Dan, Just how the heck do you keep quoting only 18% for Rebekah? You make no sense. In 2006, Scott Kleeb managed to get 45% of the vote. In 2008, Jay Stoddard, who didn't really even campaign, got 25% of the vote. Registered Democrats run 25-28% in the Third District. Now, unless you suddenly think Democrats are going to vote for radical tea partiers like yourself and Adrian Smith, your estimate of 18% is laughable. Now, if you were Tom Osborne, things may be different. But you're not Tom. Neither is Adrian. And not all Independents will support one of 2 Republican tea party candidates. By the way, why are you still registered as a Republican when you're claiming to be an Independent?

    -- Posted by gcooper on Fri, Sep 10, 2010, at 7:08 PM
  • I vote for the person with the best idea, Rep, Dem, Ind, or Lib. I don't affiliate with parties and wouldn't vote for a tea party candidate under any circumstances. They're just warmed over Republicans. In my opinion, most politicians are bought and paid for by the highest bidder and follow the orders of the highest contributers. We have the best gov't money can buy, and don't forget it.

    -- Posted by old grouch on Sat, Sep 11, 2010, at 3:45 PM
  • You're right, old grouch, too many in Washington are bought and paid for by the highest contributer. Look at Adrian. Why do you think Rebekah's absolutely refused to take special interest money? Only contributions for individuals, none from PAC's.

    -- Posted by gcooper on Sat, Sep 11, 2010, at 7:47 PM
  • agree with old grouch as well...How did Puff Daddy say it; "It's all about the benjamins baby". He who offers the most money gets his way. The company with the most money gets their way. Our country is run by corporations. Greed is on the forefront. We should just elect Wal-Mart to be the President of the United States. At least they would be fiscally responsible.

    -- Posted by cplcac on Wed, Sep 15, 2010, at 4:01 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: