Editorial

How serious is Nebraska about teen drinking?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

How serious do we want to get about teen drinking in Nebraska?

Lawmakers are dealing with that decision in Lincoln this week with the debate of what is basically the "nuclear option" when it comes to teen discipline.

Sen. John Harms' LB285 would require that teens have their drivers licenses suspended if convicted of minor-in-possession of alcohol. First offense would mean a 30-day license suspension and an alcohol-education class. A second conviction would mean 90-days suspension, community service and alcohol classes. A teen with a third conviction would lose his or her license for a year as well as requiring community service and alcohol education.

Nebraskans have reason for concern. The latest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention figures show that the state's binge-drinking rate among high school students was higher in 2005 than the national average, and only North Dakota and Montana had a higher percentage of high school students who said they had driven after drinking at least once during the month before they took the survey. While the national rate was about 10 percent, 17 percent of Nebraska teens said they had driven after drinking.

Early alcohol use has many hazards besides automobile safety, of course, damage to the developing brain and danger of addiction among them.

And, if the bill is passed, Nebraska would join the majority of states, which already tie minor-in-possession convictions to the right to drive.

The kids, of course, won't be the only ones to pay of they lose their driving privileges. Many families, especially in more sparsely populated Western Nebraska, depend on teens' ability to drive themselves and their siblings to school or work. Loss of a license is a hardship on parents as much as teens in those cases.

We're approaching what is too often a tragic time of year, when too many teens are killed in alcohol-related crashes on prom night or after graduation.

The fate of LB285 will determine whether Nebraskans are willing to make the sacrifices necessary to change things

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • It's about time someone starts giving the kids consequences. I hear so many parents complaining that their kid got a MIP and then do nothing about it except pay the fine. By taking away their license, maybe they will finally learn...maybe the parents will also learn to set down some more guidelines and know what their kids are doing. It goes both ways. I'm totally in favor of this Bill passing.

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Wed, Feb 17, 2010, at 1:04 PM
  • Why don't we regain some sanity and lower the drinking age to the same age you can enlist in the military, vote, get married etc..etc..

    Under that age I am fine with losing their liscence.

    -- Posted by Chaco1 on Thu, Feb 18, 2010, at 7:26 PM
  • I agree with lowering the drinking age back to 18. I haven't seen enough proof that raising the limit to 21 has been beneficial. If a person who is 18 is considered an adult, then they should be able to make their own decisions with regards to drinking along with entering the military, getting married, buying a home, getting a loan, etc. Either way, making under aged drinkers have tougher consequences might just do the trick...

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Fri, Feb 19, 2010, at 9:20 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: