Letter to the Editor

60 votes required

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Dear Editor,

The rules of the U.S. Senate can be confusing and they seem to have confused W.O. Wagner who wrote a letter to the editor Dec. 3 about Sen. Nelson's vote on the health care reform bill.

To put it as plainly as possible, it took 60 votes to get the bill to the floor to start debate and it will take 60 votes to end the debate ... not a simple majority of 51 as W.O. Wagner maintained in the letter.

In voting to open debate Sen. Nelson was not voting for the bill. He has repeatedly said if the bill is not changed to meet the needs of Nebraskans, he will not be one of the 60 votes needed to vote for cloture to end the debate.

If cloture is voted for then it would require a simple majority but before you can get to that you need 60 votes.

America's health care system is rapidly outpacing the ability of many people to pay for it. People with pre existing conditions cannot access it. Those with private insurance are increasingly being forced to pay the bills of those who choose not to have insurance.

It is important to at least try to fix the system. To deny the American people the ability to know where their elected representatives stand and denying senators the opportunity to debate and change the bill is not the American way.

That is why Sen. Nelson voted in favor of debating the bill, however, his vote was not a vote for the bill and if the bill is not changed to work for Nebraskans, i.e. no government takeover of insurance, no tax hikes, no premium increases, no deficit increase, and no government funded abortions, he will not be one of the 60 votes needed to end debate.

Sincerely,

Jim Fagin

Deputy Director of Communications

Sen. Ben Nelson

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Dear Mr. Fagin, Please do not play word games with people when you know what they address. W.O. Wagner, I believe, is concerned about the same thing I am. Sixty votes to get a bill debate ended is a whole lot easier to obtain than you make it sound, and that vote can only lead to the vote that requires 'simple majority' to 'pass or fail.' I may be wrong, but I do not know of any other avenue, of rejection, other than 'motion to pass' (no matter 'intent' of motion, Pro, or Con).

    Please correct any error, and allay my concern (I suspect there are more than a few who would like to know).

    Merry Christmas to Ben and the staff, one and all.

    Arley Steinhour

    RMC(SS) USN (Retired)

    Admiral, GNN (^8

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Wed, Dec 9, 2009, at 4:09 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: