Letter to the Editor

Prime rib or baloney?

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

The editorial in the Nov. 2, Gazette stinks. If you are going to promote a position, do so only if you know something about the subject.

Said editorial states the cost to save West Ward would be $2,500,000. An article on Oct. 27, said the cost would be $2,251,000. (typical goverment project, cost went up 10 percent in 6 days) The Nov. 1, editorial says the building is 95 years old ... Gee on 10/27 it was only 84. So much for your paper's creditability on this subject.

As penance, I would hope you would give those who want to save West Ward a full page to make their case, like you gave the city in the Oct. 27 paper.

In the 20 plus years I spent in mortgage banking I saw hundreds of "feasibility studies."

They all made the case that reflected the client's views ... I never saw one that told the client "you are out of your ever lovin' mind."

The study was done by a firm who does a lot of business with the city and would make a lot more loot being involved in a totally new building, Hm-mm

Of the rehab costs I see only $90,000 that you would not have in a new building, ($30,000 interior wall demolition, $60,000 in asbestos remediation). Fixing the exterior walls at $35,000 is at least $50,000 less than new walls for a 16,500 square foot building, interior floor repairs and finish, $105,000 is less than new floors from scratch (I.E. 16,500 of prep and concrete at $4 square foot = $66,000, 10,000 square foot of floor coverings at $8 =$80,000). Floor rehab would be approximately $40,000 less than new.

It would appear rehab would cost $130,000 less than their $2,251,000 estimate. A few bucks could probably be shaved from the $450,000 main entry addition, Wow, $450,000, that's almost 25 percent of their estimate for a 16,500 square foot building ... lose the gold door knobs.

The city claims the new facility would cost $1,892,000. If we deduct $80,000 site work that puts the cost of the building at $1,812,000. That, my fellow victims, is only $110 per square foot.

The cost of an average home is about $100 a square foot. Unless they use slave labor and steal a lot of materials, there is no way to build a commercial building for $110. Even a conservative estimate of $150 would put the cost at $2,475,000.

Realizing government officials, architects and engineers like to build monuments to themselves with other peoples' money, it would not surprise me to see the eventual cost at $3,000,000 for a new facility.

The photos in the Oct. 27 article we obviously meant to startle us. All the things shown would be corrected with rehab. Don't suppose they were trying to sell us, do you? A few of us know the difference between baloney and prime-rib.

If rehab doesn't make sense, why did the city get behind the Keystone project (a decision I applaud)? They did the right thing then.

Why not on West Ward?

'nuff said,

Bill Frasier

McCook

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • We will soon know if the reb costs are higher than new as the city is moving to again (the school already did it, the county and 2 private investors) see if rehab is the answer. The other studies all said rehab will cost the taxpayers more and the building will still not be designed to meet specific needs. The answer to your question of "Why not West Ward?" is that as of all current studies it would cost the local taxpayers more. The city will be giving the citizens the opportunity to vote to approve a new fire/safety/police station and city offices and to vote to approve a bond to do it either as a rehab or new. in this case rehab might not make sense but I believe the mayor said the extra cost should not be on the local taxpayers dime if it costs more. However if it does cost more I am sure the city would take your donation to cover the extra cost and that is no baloney.

    -- Posted by dennis on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, at 3:59 PM
  • great article Bill..glad to see there are others who think the same way i do..

    -- Posted by misty on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, at 2:43 AM
  • Really, does McCook need anything more than a steel building with cubicles for offices in it?

    -- Posted by Hugh Jassle on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, at 7:20 PM
  • Schools now need larger rooms, the ability to network computers, and many other things that couldn't possibly have been foreseen when the building was originally planned.

    However, office space can be designed into an older building during renovation with much less trouble.

    -- Posted by MrsSmith on Sat, Nov 7, 2009, at 4:27 PM
  • ""Nuff said"" you throw numbers out like you are a experienced big building contractor with actual experience but your actual experience running a small colorado wedding/conference center and menu planning experience/morgage banker?? is not actual large commercial building expertise and throwing up unproveable numbers rehap numbers for west ward and maybe your recent experience rehabing a few old houses is not even close experience to builings like West Ward turning into a City Emergency/Fire response center....please leave this job to the real building experts who deal with real numbers daily and its there full time job in 2009.

    -- Posted by Cornwhisperer on Wed, Nov 11, 2009, at 11:32 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: