Editorial

Spam wastes real energy at home and workd

Thursday, April 23, 2009

If you don't have some type of filter on your home or business e-mail, you know the problem. Thousands of "spam" messages touting everything from male enhancement to Nigerian bank transfer scams.

Not only do they waste your personal time and that of your employers, but they're actually a serious waste of energy -- that's actual energy, the kind that burns fossil fuel and generates carbon dioxide.

How much?

According to the McAfee security software company, the 62 trillion junk e-mails that were sent last year used enough energy to power 2.4 million homes for a year or to drive a car around the planet 1.6 times.

And, each of those e-mail messages sent out last year created 0.3 grams of CO2 -- some 17 million metric tons worldwide, or some .2 percent of total global emissions.

That's the same amount of CO2 generated by all the cars crossing the Golden Gate Bridge in one month.

It's the same amount of energy used by Vermont, Alaska, North Dakota, Wyoming or Washington D.C.

That pollution is generated by PC users viewing, deleting and searching for legitimate e-mail among the piles of spam. It takes about 3 seconds to view and trash a piece of spam, according to McAfee.

Some experts suggest changing your e-mail address yearly, and other say making sure your screen name, used to post online comments, is nothing like your e-mail address. And, shut off the auto-complete feature on your browser, because it may allow spammers to harvest personal informal.

What's the solution?

Any restriction on Internet communication is an affront to the nature of the World Wide Web.

But charging even a fraction of a penny for each of those 62 trillion e-mails would not only reduce the volume of spam drastically, it would generate some serious cash for purposes like clean energy research.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • 62 trillion, huh? Sounds like the National debt.

    From the looks of things, the web may well go the way of the CB radio, due to the abuses heaped upon the system, and the users. That is sad, but, for some reason, people do not care.

    One interesting factor, though. It seems that every e-mail, and fwd that I send to anyone with an Yahoo address, arrives branded 'spam.' As I understand, that is what happens with any message sent through Pinpoint services. I don't know why, but perhaps, my words are to be considered spam, and therefore, part of the spam problem. Hmmmmm.

    In Messiah. Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Thu, Apr 23, 2009, at 4:03 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: