Editorial

More evidence preservative, autism not linked

Monday, January 26, 2009

Childhood diseases like measels and chickenpox that Baby Boomers' parents accepted as normal have become almost unknown, thanks to routine vaccinations.

Shots for diptheria, whooping cough, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps and rubella are as routine as filling out baby books.

But an increase in the number of children with autism over the years has created concern that the disorder is related to childhood vaccinations, specifically a mercury-based chemical once used as a preservative.

A new study adds to the growing body of evidence that the preservative, no longer used, put children at no greater risk of autism.

Italian health officials unwittingly set up the study, administering two different levels of thimerosal to thousands of healthy babies receiving whooping cough vaccines.

Ten years later, 1,402 of those children took a battery of brain function tests, and the results showed small differences in only two of 24 measurements. Those were so slight that they might be a result of chance, according to the study.

Only one case of autism was found among the study's subjects, and that was among the group which received the lower level of the mercury-based preservative.

Certainly parents are wise not to blindly accept vaccinations without becoming educated consumers.

But unless the majority of children receive routine vaccination for the major communicable diseases, those diseases will become common again. Some authorities have even resorted to quarantines in areas where vaccines are avoided or neglected.

When it comes to routine childhood vaccinations, contact your local health department or health care providers and follow their recommendations.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • a study comparing kids vaccinated with thimerosal vs. other kids vaccinated with thimerosal is a study on the safety of thimerosal? nice try. we are waiting to see long-term health outcomes on kids fully vaccinated on today's schedule and those never-vaxed. we are still waiting for a real safety study.

    -- Posted by sarah130 on Mon, Jan 26, 2009, at 2:29 PM
  • I'm sorry but according to all vaccine packaging and inserts, no one makes the claim that their product is safe. Some are safer than others but all carry a risk of injury, particularly if administered wrong.

    This study of 1,403 Italians supposedly shows no direct brain injuries caused from a preservative used in vaccines apparently all of these subjects, save one, grew up to be normal and healthy ten years later. Perhaps as one post suggests sarcastically, maybe the preservative is beneficial to the human body, particularly an infant's body.

    To state that vaccines are safe is incorrect.

    Case in point, ProQuad a MMRV made by Merck is required to state as an adverse reaction that the product may cause seizures and encephalopathy.

    http://www.fda.gov/cber/label/proquadlb.pdf

    -- Posted by bensmyson on Mon, Jan 26, 2009, at 4:23 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: