Letter to the Editor

Obama's faith policy and our nation's future

Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Cassie Olson

Although the vast majority of voters in Southwest Nebraska and northwest Kansas are unhappy about who will become president on Jan. 20, voters can't let their anger and resentment prevent them from taking responsibility to create change. They can choose to work with President-elect Barack Obama, by knowing he will be fair-minded and include both the religious and nonreligious as part of the dialogue to solve the country's problems.

In the United States, 83.9 percent of adults affiliate themselves with a religion and 78.4 percent say they are Christians, according to the Pew Forum U.S. Religious Landscape Survey conducted in 2007. Believers and nonbelievers alike wonder how Obama's faith will affect policies of the United States.

According to his campaign, Obama hopes to mend the nation's religious divide by forging common ground between the polarities, while also diverging from some of President Bush's policy.

Despite rumors spread across the country, Obama says he deeply believes in the precepts of Jesus Christ.

"I am a Christian. I have been sworn in with a Bible. I pledge allegiance and lead the Pledge of Allegiance sometimes in the U.S. Senate, when I'm presiding," Obama said in response to e-mail allegations mentioned during the 2008 Democratic debate in Las Vegas.

Obama explained his perspective on faith and politics in an acclaimed "Call for Renewal" speech in June 2006. He acknowledged religion couldn't be ignored in a country of religious people. However, Obama said church and state should remain separate.

"We live in a pluralistic society," he said. "I can't impose my own religious views on another."

Because the religious and the secularists are both important in solving the nation's problems, Obama said nonbelievers must realize faith is part of the solution.

"The problems of poverty and racism, the uninsured and the unemployed, are not simply technical problems in search of the perfect 10-point plan," Obama said. "They are rooted in both societal indifference and individual callousness -- in the imperfections of man. Solving these problems will require changes in government policy, but it will also require changes in hearts and a change in minds."

He encouraged nonbelievers to stop forcing the religious to leave their beliefs out of public debate. He brought to mind the countless reformers -- Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King Jr. -- who used their religion to foster change.

At the same time, believers need to maintain an open discussion.

"Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion- specific, values," Obama said. "It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason."

Obama also wants believers to ensure their policy does not exclude any one American. He reminded believers they can recognize public policy without it dictating church practices, and he reminded Americans not every mention of God is a breach in the separation of church and state.

It is evident Obama will diverge from President Bush's religious rhetoric. According to Fred Barnes' book "Rebel-in-Chief" published in 2006, Bush was always eager to talk about his religious beliefs and include them in aspects of his policy. Barnes quotes Bush as saying, "Those [questions about his religious beliefs] will be the most important questions I get all day."

Bush's faith encouraged his support for the faith-based initiative: providing increased government assistance to religious groups who help struggling Americans. He also prevented expanding federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and ended support for international abortion programs.

Obama's faith will provide a moral base for his decisions, but will not dictate his policy. While campaigning in Ohio during July 2008, Obama said he hopes to reform and expand Bush's faith-based programs. However, Obama supports keeping abortions legal and promotes embryonic stem cell research.

Although some might disagree with his policy, Obama hopes Americans can join forces to prevent the nearly 1 million abortions that have occurred in the United States each year from 1975 to 2003, as reported by the Center for Disease and Control. Obama also believes United States citizens can cross party lines to eliminate the poverty 37.3 million Americans were living in during 2007, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Americans can be thankful Obama is neither forcing beliefs on anyone nor opposing or excluding either side from the debate or the solution. The years following 2008 are a new dawn, but Obama will only succeed in mending the country and bringing the right change if Americans are willing to lay down their pride, work past their apathetic resentment and take action -- together -- for the common good.

(* Locate Obama's "Call for Renewal " speech and his Ohio remarks on the Council for Faith-based Groups and Neighborhood Partnerships at this site)

-- Cassie Olson, a McCook native, is a journalism student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Comments
View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    I find it among the heights of hypocrisy that all of the sudden, Democrats and Liberals are shouting from the rooftops the need to get over (by which I interpret they mean Conservatives and Republicans should forget about and fall in line) the divisiveness that the fringe groups on both sides have created. Apparently what's good for the goose (or duck as it were) is not good for the gander.

    -- Posted by SWNebr Transplant on Tue, Dec 9, 2008, at 2:33 PM
  • you know SWT, if a Republican was elected as president, they'd be saying the same thing...

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Tue, Dec 9, 2008, at 3:41 PM
  • I fear the proof is going to be in the pudding of performance, and I do pray you are correct in your projection.

    As a Christian, however, please re-read your statement: "Obama says he deeply believes in the precepts of Jesus Christ." and check the meaning of 'precept.' In Christianity, a person believes in Messiah, Christ Jesus, which include His 'precepts' ( Teaching,1. a direction meant as a rule of action or conduct. 2. a rule or moral conduct; maxim).

    Mr Obama's words does not espouse faith in God, nor Messiah, only the 'precepts' of Christs teaching.

    Your article does not allay my concerns one iota, and hold my true acceptance for the pudding.

    In Messiah, His Shalom, and discernment. Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Tue, Dec 9, 2008, at 4:47 PM
  • *

    There are so many errors in this article, I had to select just a few of them to comment on.

    First off, Obama can claim anything he wants, but man that would vote three different times to let a baby girl, who has survived the horror of a botched abortion, to die a horrible death on some lonely steel table, with no one but God to hold her tiny hand, is no Christian.

    A man who attended a Church, whose Pastor is a raging racist, for over twenty years, is no Christian. A man who supports men marrying men, is no Christian. I don't recall Christian doctrine that says Government is allowed to steal money from the rich either. What chapter and verse is that?

    Addressing Obamas' quote regarding Democracy, young lady, we do not live in a Democracy. This is a Republic. Once again, Democracy is two men and one woman on a desert island, and the men just voted...two to one, to allow rape.

    And just where do the fifty million dead babies fit into all this? Just a choice, huh? I don't believe in child rape, but if you want to do it, who am I to say it's wrong? That is a stupid argument, and deadly.

    How can Obama mend the country, when he could not even make a difference in the racist church he attended for twenty years? Obama has never had to make a payroll, lay his own money down in a business venture, nor has he produced, delivered or built a single thing, other than two narcissistic memoirs of his own life. Whoopee!! He has fed at the public trough his entire adult life.

    Chicago has high murder rates, high unemployment, high levels of white and black racism, dying businesses, while Barry partied with terrorists, black separatists, and Jew haters...yet Obama will heal a country, when he could not heal a city?

    I sense some Socialist Professor has your ear, and you probably need to spend more time listening to your mom or dad.

    AND, one more thing. The only "anger" or "resentment" I've seen on display, has been from the hysterical left for the past eight years. If anything, the RIGHT, has not been angry or hysterical ENOUGH. I pray for the Christian right to finally GET ANGRY.

    No way will I sit back and simply let Obama and his ilk try and destroy my children's future, without a fight, just because George Soros managed to buy the election.

    -- Posted by sameldridge on Sat, Dec 13, 2008, at 1:49 AM
  • Eldridge, Navy Blue, Cirizen, and Teransplant are you asshamed of yourselves, why not identify who you are. No one will come to harm you. Join in the effort now before all of us (maybe never available again) to try to preserve our way of life.

    -- Posted by Raymond Rowland on Sat, Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 PM
  • just for everyones info: Navyblue has identified himself more times than not in his replys. I, for one, eagerly await his responses in these columns.

    -- Posted by doodle bug on Mon, Dec 15, 2008, at 4:54 PM
  • *

    Yo - Ray. Sam Eldridge / McCook - Oberlin

    -- Posted by sameldridge on Tue, Dec 16, 2008, at 10:39 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: