Another view on NRD
Dear Editor,
Depletion of the aquifer has caused and will continue to cause more loss of surface water, plus an ever-increasing number of ground water wells going dry. Charts show on an average, since 1972 the river and stream flow has and will continue to decline without sustainability of the aquifer. This is especially harmful to those in the southern counties of the Republican Basin areas.
It depends if you are getting a benefit or harmed by NRDs action or lack of action. LB 701 taxes penalizes all the farmers who didn't drill a well or add additional irrigated acres after a statute was passed that made it known there should be no more wells drilled after January 1, 2001, or there was a possible restriction or shut down. LB 701 rewards the neighbor who went ahead and drilled a well and/or added irrigated acres at the expense of the ones who followed the intent of the statutes.
When it was known Kansas was going to sue in the '90s, even though there was a moratorium in place, the URNRD allowed satellite pivots as "irrigated acres" that are not "certified irrigated acres" on approximately additional 60,000 plus acres, to use up tremendous carryover allotments up from previous years from the certified acres. This accelerated the drying up of the Republican and Frenchmen River in the late 90's that furnished water for irrigation district and compact requirements. This reduces the surface flow and underground flow, affects the NRDs below them.
The MRNRD allowed 30,000 plus acres to be added to existing wells after the settlement on Dec. 16, 2002. Several requests were made to the MRNRD not do that and they were given data showing what the County Assessor and the FSA irrigated acres were for the district, to no avail. Board members got voted if they tried to do what DNR requested. Board members make or allowed special rules and regulations to hurt surface water irrigators and benefit their own personal interest.
The LRNRD evidently allowed wells and thousands of acres to be developed after the Dec. 16, 2002 settlement. Tri-Basin is still allowing new wells to be drilled.
The occupational tax is being used unjustly to tax surface water irrigators, trying to force them to give up their irrigation allotments. After 701 was passed at a MRNRD meeting they were informed that the surface water irrigators still have a State obligation to pay the O&M plus there is no option to get out of an irrigation district, when asked not put on the occupational tax on those who haven't received surface water since 2002, were told either pay it or give up your allotments.
If there is a need for funds for certain years of shortage, put the tax on each acre-foot of water an irrigator pumps for irrigation and not on every citizen or people which have already been harmed by the over pumping. Set the allotment at a sustainable level. There will not be much carryover in the year it is cropped. There are irrigators, especially in the quick response area that get by on half the water that other irrigators use. Those who lost a full water supply have learned they don't need as much water to be just as profitable. Their profit is reasonable, because they don't have as much input cost. Farming practices and rotation make a lot of difference in the amount of water used. The water would be used on the land most suited for irrigation. The quality of land has a lot to do with the amount of water it takes to produce a crop. Sandy land and hillsides take a lot more water and produce less. Surprisingly, when you have less water available, management increases and productivity per acre-inch of water applied goes up dramatically. You learn how to get by with what you have, when you have to.
A comment on taxes, the value of the land is why it pays more taxes, the same as a home, business or pastureland versus tillable land. Premium prices are paid for certain homes. Should everybody pay an equal tax?
Meeting the compact requirements is an obligation of the state. The State knowingly allowed the problems to occur in meeting compact requirements. The state statute is; every landowner shall be entitled to a reasonable and beneficial use of the ground water underlying his or her land, subject to the provisions of Chapter 46, article 6, and the correlative rights of other landowners when the ground water supply is insufficient for all users. Correlative rights are defined as everyone shares equal in time of shortage. Nebraska constitution says no bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges or immunities shall be passed. Surface water and ground water are now considered to be from the same source.
The NRDs could become sustainable in the basin, while meeting the compact requirement and all irrigators treated equal within an NRD. We would have rivers and streams in the future. That is what it appears the candidates from the McCook area seem to be targeting.
Claude Cappel,
McCook