Editorial

Will Obama's promises hold up?

Friday, August 29, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama's acceptance speech Thursday night was a good indication of just what the Republicans and John McCain are up against. Most viewers knew when he spoke at the 2004 Democratic National Convention that he would be a force to be reckoned with in the years to come.

We won't pretend to offer a learned political analysis of Obama's speech, but it was interesting to go through a printed version with a highlighter to mark the candidate's specific promises.

Obama called for government to "provide every child a decent education, keep our water clean and our toys safe, invest in new schools and new roads and new science and technology."

Anyone who paid their property taxes or their water bill or gasoline bill this month knows that it's not government that provides education or clean water or roads, it's taxpayers and consumers.

While we agree with the senator's statement that America believes that "I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper," we don't agree with the assumption that government is always the best vehicle for putting that belief into action.

Obama calls for cutting tax breaks to businesses that "ship jobs overseas and giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America." He doesn't say, however, how that will help the companies provide the profits they need to stay in business and provide the dividends and value that make workers' 401K's and retirement investments worthwhile.

We laud Obama's vow to "set a clear goal as President: in 10 years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East." While we should do that, how does he propose to ease the financial pain for low-income workers who already can't afford the price of gasoline, let alone investing in new, efficient vehicles?

He also needs to explain how he'll make it possible for auto companies to overcome high labor prices to build new fuel-efficient cars in America while at the same time making it "easier for American people to afford these new cars." How does he propose to make it possible for American cars to compete with those produced by cheap labor over seas, in places like China, for instance?

While investing "150 billion dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy -- wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs that pay well and can't ever be outsourced," is a great idea, where is the investment going to come from?

The same for investing in early childhood education, and "an army of new teachers" paid higher salaries and with "higher standards and more accountability."

Most of that property tax bill many of us paid this week already goes to education; and challenging teaching contracts will be difficult for a party that traditionally finds much of its support in teachers' unions.

How does he propose to pay for the promise of a college education in exchange for national or military service?

How does he propose to lower everyone's health care premiums, as well as providing "the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves" to those who don't have coverage?

While he promises to "go through the federal budget, line by line eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less," to pay for his proposals, that process would take decades, not the four or eight years he may have to accomplish it.

And, doing it responsibly in regard to the federal deficit, while still easing taxes? Good luck.

Yes, Obama is an inspiring speaker, and the ability to inspire should not be underestimated. But like all candidates, he made many promises that, in the harsh light of reality, will be difficult or impossible to achieve.

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Well addressed. Most of the promises made, where the candidate says: "I will" do this, or that, indicates how little they understand our Republican form of government (unless they plan on having a Congress in place that can overule a filibuster, and follow the absolute rule of that candidate). Only one of our present candidates has a chance to 'own' this country for the next four years. Go figure.

    Any of the above promises made have the fantastic ability to weigh on the backs of the American tax payer, be the plan be successful, or failure. Successful, The President gets the credit, and the taxpayer gets the bill.

    If unsuccessful, the taxpayer gets the blame, plus the bill for the failure, and The President goes home with a great retirement check. Enough said.

    No one seems to notice one other thing, about either candidate. It is called: 'Campaigning for a second term,' right from the beginning. Everything, that they say will work, always takes ten or more years, and only will work if they, the candidate, is in charge for eight years. The last two years of their forcast allows for someone else to mess up their well laid plans, thus giving them an excuse, should the plan fail. The failure will always be recognized two years after they left office. Just a thought.

    End of rant. Shalom to one and all, in Christ. Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Fri, Aug 29, 2008, at 10:44 AM
  • One thing McCain can promise and adhear to is 8 more years of the same old crap...all of our money going overseas to support other countries and fight in a war of which we should be spending that money finding new oil sources right here at home. Heck who knows? Maybe we should get into a war with Russia...he's all up for that. Then who are we really supporting. Us here in America? I don't think so. We could have enough money left over for the education, jobs, 401Ks, manufacturers to stay here in America, etc. We do need a change. Is Obama the right change? Who knows. At least he's the lesser of two evils as I see it.

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Fri, Aug 29, 2008, at 1:10 PM
  • I couldn't have put it in any better words myself Navyblue. Maybe

    you should write a column for the paper.

    -- Posted by Keda46 on Sun, Aug 31, 2008, at 8:11 PM
  • I will second Keda46's idea. I too would like to see an occasional column by Navyblue!!!

    -- Posted by doodle bug on Mon, Sep 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM
  • Go McCain and Palin!

    Jim

    -- Posted by Jim Foster on Tue, Sep 2, 2008, at 11:06 PM
  • IMHO, Obama comes across as an over-privileged Ivy-league educated lawyer that greased the right palms in Chicago to get where he is today. He lacks the practical experience that we all must consider to be the nation's CEO. He barely has the credentials that should be required to be a Senator, let alone a President.

    "Rural Citizen" pointed out that if we send McCain & Palin to Washington we can look forward to 8 more years of...(well, you can read for yourself), but what about Biden's 30+ years doing the "same old stuff" in his job? Or is that 'different'?

    Look at it this way; Imagine if you were hurt and needed to go to the doctor. There are 2 doctors at the hospital, both are M.D.'s, and you can choose the one to treat your injuries. One of the doctors is a handsome charismatic young man who proudly walks in, impecably dressed, and takes time to tell you how well-equipped his operating room is, and how high he graduated in med school, and how many friends he has who are important doctors in bigger hospitals. He tells you that your injuries are serious, but he is going to CHANGE your condition. And even though he has never performed the procedure you require, he has seen others do it and he is confident he can do the job and things will suddenly be better for both you AND your family if he works on you. You ask what he plans to do, but he can't give you a straight answer, he just keeps telling you that things are just going to be better...trust me!

    He walks out, and another man walks in. This one is a silver-haired gentle man who speaks slower and looks you in the eye as he greets you. He asks how you feel, and seems to sincerely care. So you ask him if he's qualified to do what needs to be done. He loooks at you and says not only has he done this procedure countless times, but he has been in practice for 30 successful years. He doesn't have to boast about his education, because you can see in his face that he has the experience needed to save your life and heal your wounds.

    As the second doctor walks away, you notice that he has a slight limp and one elbow is a little more stiff than the other, so you call him back to your bedside. "Can I ask what happened to you? Why do you walk that way", you ask. He smiles back at you and says, "Because one day I was just like you, and a doctor like me saved MY life. Now, I take my experience as a patient and use it as a doctor to help people like you because I've been there and I know how you feel." Then he walks away again.

    John McCain is that kind of a man. No, he's not a a doctor, but this country has some wounds that need to be healed and there IS some blood being shed in many places. Though he doesn't have the experience as a physician, he has the experience as an elected public official and has more years of service under his belt than most of the registered voters have been alive. He has chosen the right running mate who has sufficient practical experience as the head of local and state government, plus is a wife & mother. Sarah Palin has the personality and determination to handle anything that comes her way with effective leadership.

    I encourage everyone to do as I did and take the time to put the rhetoric aside and look at both tickets and make an informed decision not based on what the talking heads on TV say, but rather on what YOU find out for yourself. Sometimes I think we shouldn't be allowed to have a ballot unless we can answer a verbal quiz about what it is we're voting for!

    -- Posted by Willie B Wright on Fri, Sep 5, 2008, at 9:54 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: