Editorial

Biofuels not as simple as food vs. fuel

Thursday, May 1, 2008

In case you haven't noticed, it not only takes more dollars to fill the gas tank to go to the grocery store, it takes more dollars at the checkout stand.

According to federal information, home food prices have gone up 6 percent since 2005, and are expected to be up another 4-5 percent this year.

Leading the way are eggs, up 35.5 percent over that period, and expected to climb up to 4 percent this year. Fish and seafood are up 9.5 percent and fruits and vegetables are up nearly 9 percent.

Like the fuel it takes to bring the food home from the store, the price of the fuel it takes to haul the food to the store is climbing daily.

Unfortunately, the ethanol industry is an easy target for people looking for a scapegoat. Land that would otherwise be used to grow crops for food is being converted to corn grown for ethanol, the argument goes, putting food in competition with energy for the first time.

And, the ethanol industry admits it may have caused a 4 percent increase in the price of food, a fraction of the 20 percent estimated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

But Bob Dinneen, president of the Renewable Fuels Association, has a point when he says things might actually be worse if not for ethanol, which he says is lowering demand for oil enough to keep prices 30 percent below where they would be otherwise.

"All the crises we're facing have one common denominator: the every tightening oil market," Dinneen said. "We cannot afford to jettison the promise of biofuels due to this manufactured hysteria over a fight between food vs. fuel."

Sen. John McCain is a latecomer to support of ethanol, and fellow Arizona congressional delegate Rep. Jeff Flake is calling for repeal of government incentives designed to boost ethanol production. Earlier, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas proposed freezing the ethanol production mandate at current levels. In December, Congress passed an energy bill that mandates a fivefold increase in ethanol production by 2022.

Biofuels are more than a matter of simple economics.

The United States has long followed a cheap food policy, and that should not be changed radically.

But it's in our vital national interest to reduce our dependence on foreign oil as quickly and effectively as possible.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Should Bio-fuel catch on, I fear that Government will start passing laws requiring a minimum 'Miles per bushel,' yuk, yuk, yuk.

    We have a problem, requiring decision, folks. Eigther we drill for oil, eat more expensive food, or break out the Huffy bike. Let your government representative know which choice you will make.

    Shalom in Christ, Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Fri, May 2, 2008, at 3:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: