Editorial

Teachers' union makes plea for competitive pay

Saturday, March 8, 2008

The Nebraska State Education Association made its bid Friday for a piece of the projected state revenue surplus, calling for support of a bill that would set aside $200 million of the funds in trust, and using the interest to enhance teacher salaries.

The teachers' union used some powerful ammunition, pointing out specific examples of how Nebraska salaries are lower than adjoining states, and how those states are taking steps to boost salaries even higher.

In Southwest Nebraska, for example, McCook's base salary of $27,575 compares to Oberlin's $31,170,and Imperial's base salary of $26,800 compares to Holyoke, Colo.'s $31,000.

NSEA officials cited economic development as reason enough to boost teacher salaries, saying we need to pay teachers more to keep them in our state to continue training a reliable, educated and dedicated workforce.

There's no doubt that Nebraska's teachers are underpaid, especially the talented majority who are wholeheartedly committed to providing the quality education the next generation needs.

Friday's release, however, doesn't mention that most educators already receive a salary and benefit package that is much higher than the base level, and the envy of the average worker in those same communities.

Or that tenured teachers' jobs are far more secure than those in private industry -- which shed 63,000 jobs nationwide in February, the fastest drop in five years. And, the vast majority of those jobs were eliminated without complicated reduction-in-force procedures.

There's no doubt that teacher salaries need to keep up with our neighboring states, despite the fact our student test scores already rank with the best in the nation.

But there's nothing wrong with publicly-funded jobs staying in step with those in the private sector.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Teachers have been underpaid since before Moby Dick was a minnow! Good luck! Arley Steinhour

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Sat, Mar 8, 2008, at 9:41 PM
  • Maybe if the teachers would go back to teaching the students something substantial, I would agree to a pay raise. But then again, where can a person work for 9 months out of the year and yet get paid for 12? If they stop and figure out what they are actually making, they'd realize that they are getting paid quite a bit more than the average citizen.

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Mon, Mar 10, 2008, at 11:53 AM
  • I guess it would all depend on your definition of adequate pay. Some teachers may be underpaid, but in my opinion, far from the majority. I would be in favor of raises based on merit, with merit being determined by results, not longevity.

    -- Posted by doodle bug on Mon, Mar 10, 2008, at 3:41 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: