State water law shifting toward local regulation

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

LINCOLN, Neb. -- Having enough water is an increasingly important issue for Nebraska farmers and city dwellers alike, but regulating water use is not something new for state policymakers.

Nebraska has a long history of water law, and with the complex interplay of water rights, recent droughts and continued legal pressure from Kansas over the Republican River, state water laws have gone through many changes, with an increased emphasis on local control of water management.

Nebraska's water law history began with surface water. In 1895 Nebraska created a "first in time, first in right" rule, which was designed to promote settlement in the state, said Dean Edson, executive director of the Nebraska Association of Resources Districts.

While governing water rights was first established for surface water, groundwater beneath the surface soon became of increasing importance as irrigated agriculture grew. The majority of Nebraska's approximately 10 million irrigated acres comes from groundwater, and the expansive Ogallala Aquifer is critical for farmers in the western part of the state.

"Nebraska is the Saudi Arabia of groundwater," said Dave Aiken, University of Nebraska-Lincoln professor and water law specialist.

Groundwater regulation began with the concept of correlated rights, which allowed landowners to extract water from the ground for a beneficial purpose. With Nebraska's deep and expansive source of groundwater in the Ogallala Aquifer, having enough of it was never an issue for most farmers, as they could drill deeper when they needed more water, Aiken said.

But, given the value and necessity of these water sources, over time the state began to recognize the need for more water management. This led to the establishment of 23 Natural Resources Districts (NRDs) with the passage of the 1975 Groundwater Management Act. Instead of being divided along political subdivision lines, districts were established according to river basin boundaries so water and natural resources in each area could be better managed depending on their needs, Edson said.

"We're so diverse in this state that we don't have a water policy to implement that would be one-size fits all," said Edson, whose association represents all 23 NRDs.

Three years later, the state gave the districts legal authority to regulate groundwater, and in the mid-'80s districts were required to develop management plans for water quantity and water quality.

While Nebraska had begun to regulate groundwater, little had been done with regulating surface water use. This started to become an issue as more people realized the interconnectedness of groundwater and surface water. About half of the stream water flow in Nebraska can be attributed to groundwater, Aiken said.

"If groundwater was red, all the streams in Nebraska would be pink," he said.

The relationship between groundwater and surface water regulation can become particularly problematic when water sources flow between states, such as in the case of the Republican River, which flows through Colorado, Nebraska and Kansas.

Nebraska officially recognized the surface water and groundwater relationship with 1996 legislation, and more joint regulation of surface water and groundwater started to take shape in the early to mid-2000s with the creation of the Water Policy Task Force, which was established to address how to manage both water systems.

Legislation passed soon thereafter allowing NRDs to take annual assessments of all the watersheds in Nebraska and designate their water as fully, under- or over-appropriated. Depending on the NRD, certain regulations would kick in if a watershed was fully or over-appropriated, Edson said.

This new authority gave greater control to the NRDs instead of the state determining much of the water regulation.

"Even though we were given the authority to regulate groundwater back in the '70s, we didn't really get all of the authorities we have today right away; those got piecemealed in," Edson said

The most recent change relating to state water law took place earlier this year when the legislature established a Water Sustainability Fund, which authorized increased state support for NRD projects related to integrated management of groundwater and surface water, among other provisions.

Both Aiken and Edson said they don't expect any major changes to Nebraska water law in the near future. But the demands on water related to climate change and an increasing population may continue to put pressure on the NRDs and lawmakers to come up with new ways to protect Nebraska's valuable water supply.

"There will be issues, but I think that we'll be able to handle it," Aiken said.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • "If groundwater was red, all the streams in Nebraska would be pink" Really? Oh, that must be because of the NRD"s brilliant plan to pump ground water into Nebraska streams to sustain flow. Because ground water is a magical substance that historically is the source for all stream flow. Whoever would suggest that "If ground water was red, then all the lakes and streams at elevations above said ground water must be red too since ground water is the natural collection of surface water that has gravitationally permeated through surface layers until reaching an impermeable layer of rock or substrate " must be a delusional lunatic out spreading falsehoods in their disillusioned attempt to protect groundwater from total depletion by the only political organization promoting such a course of action; THE NEBRASKA NRD!

    -- Posted by shallal on Wed, Sep 24, 2014, at 4:05 PM
  • The Black Swan of SW Nebraska is that there is a real possibility that under current conditions future generations may not have an aquifer to pump water from. Multiple studies have indicated that we can not continue with current pumping....and pumping from Lincoln County is still pumping. The communities in the basin need to have plans ready when water tables continue to fall and when the wells run dry. I realize some will say that it will not happen for generations. That is what the Texans said about the Ogallala Aquifer they sat over. Now they are dry. Nobody I know wants to shut all pumping off but doing more of the same with the same leadership and direction as now has shown it does not work. When some local wells are already dry, when some water table levels dropped 30 or more feet in just a couple of years, when a person can just look and see the lakes, streams and rivers are already at low levels, maybe that is our warning.

    -- Posted by dennis on Wed, Sep 24, 2014, at 7:14 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: