Bill would compensate surface irrigators for water

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

LINCOLN, Nebraska -- Nebraska farmers might be reimbursed for surface water taken by the state with a bill advanced by Nebraska lawmakers Tuesday.

The bill (LB522), sponsored by Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial, advanced on a 27-0 vote with amendments. Senators plan to continue to amend this bill, however, before it moves to select file and final passage.

Christensen proposed the bill because residents of the Republican River Basin irrigation district in southern Nebraska lost access to much of their surface water from the Republican River with last year's dry weather.

After amendments, the bill would use money from the state's general funds to compensate farmers for the water they were prohibited from using. The amendments set a cap of $10 million each fiscal year to pay these farmers.

"We can work around the priorities and needs of the state and do it in a fiscally responsible method," Christensen said.

Supporters of the bill discussed the importance of water to every aspect of Nebraska's economy rather than simply those who were seeking compensation.

Sen. Annette Dubas of Fullerton said the loss of water has a "ripple effect" because it can impact the ability to pay taxes, which will affect local schools and communities.

"The decisions we make today are going to be critical to the future of our entire state's economy," Dubas said.

Because the Republican River runs from Colorado, through Nebraska and into Kansas, Nebraska entered into a compact with Colorado and Kansas to determine the rights to the water. Under the interstate compact, Nebraska is required to permit a certain volume of river water to flow into Kansas.

The compact caused senators to question who owned the rights to the water being compensated with the bill.

"Where does compensation start? Where does it stop? And who owns the water? And who has the responsibility?" Sen. John Harms of Scottsbluff said.

He added that he was not against the bill but wanted the body to consider its ramifications.

Sen. Dave Bloomfield of Hoskins questioned whether federal crop insurance would compensate these farmers for their losses rather than the state general funds.

Christensen said that insurance will not decide how much the affected farmers would receive until May 26, which would be too late to plant corn. He also said that insurance would be more likely to reimburse for natural disasters rather than the state use of water.

"If I knew (insurance) was paying, I would've lifted the bill," Christensen said.

Many senators said Christensen's bill emphasized the need for a long-term, sustainable plan for solving the water issues that Nebraska faces.

Sen. Tom Carlson of Holdrege proposed a bill (LB517) earlier this session, which was advanced, that would create a task force to research these water issues that many said could help with this problem. Christensen agreed a long-term plan was necessary, but wanted to help those struggling this year.

"I want to make sure this year is taken care of because the farmers got blindsided," Christensen said.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Thats a good idea. Instead of removing taxes on property you no longer have, lets continue to tax it, reimburse you, and tax you again on the reimbursement; all the while continuing to confiscate property that apparently only belongs to the state anyway since they can take it whenever they feel like giving to their buddies instead of the people who actually own the rights to it. Why don't I run my business this way? Its so frieking brilliant. I guess you have to pretend like anarchy isn't your business model even though it clearly is.

    -- Posted by shallal on Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 12:38 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: