Owners appeal city condemnation of property

Friday, February 13, 2009

The McCook City Council will be asked whether to stand by or change its previous decision of condemning two properties as a public nuisance, at its regular meeting Monday, 7:30 p.m. at City Council Chambers in Memorial Auditorium.

At its Jan. 19 meeting, the council accepted the determination from the McCook Health Board to condemn as a public nuisance properties at 301 E. Second, owned by Terry Jessen of Scottsbluff and 1306 West 12th, owned by Bernard and Kathryn Weaver of Garfield, Kan. Another property, at 206 W. Seventh, was also condemned at that meeting.

None of the properties condemned were inhabited.

Both Jessen and the Weavers have appealed the decision and a public hearing is slated for Monday's meeting to review testimony. After the hearing, the council will decide whether to modify its condemnation notice or uphold it.

Another regular agenda item up for approval at Monday's meeting is an amendment to current city code, to clarify abandoned structures in the city.

The amendment will include the definition of an unsafe building one that is 50 percent damaged, decayed or deteriorated from its original condition.

If approved, the new language will include buildings that have been destroyed or burned and left standing in the city.

The council will also hear an update by Rex Nelson of the McCook Economic Development Corp. on the bonding method needed for the Keystone Hotel Business Center project.

Rehabilitation of the structure is being sponsored by the MEDC.

And plans for the $8.5 million facility for the National Guard and Army Reserve building are moving forward, with construction to begin sometime this year.

The council will be asked to approve a lease agreement with the state to rent about 30 acres of land near the McCook airport, at no cost, for construction of the proposed joint facility called the McCook Armed Forces Readiness Center.

The city has agreed to provide water and sewer lines to the entryway of the site, along U.S. Highway 6-34. The sewer line will cost $150,000, paid by city sales tax revenue of $75,000 for the next two years. The $125,000 water main will be paid by money in the water fund.

Listed as a consent agenda item, this can be approved in one motion by the council or pulled for discussion.

Another consent agenda item the council will be asked to approve is to declare as surplus the metal transit garage at the Heritage Senior Center.

The building needs to be removed to make room for the new 60 by 40 foot garage that will be constructed.

The existing garage will be removed at no charge as the company that is removing it will be allowed to keep the building for scrap metal.

A public hearing for the adoption of the 2009 Flood plain management ordinance will open Monday night's meeting.

The council will be asked after the hearing to adopt updates in the city's flood management plan.

Approval of the flood plain management plan is needed to meet federal requirements and maintain flood insurance within the city.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • So let me get this straight. The City is paying for water & sewer to the site in the amount of $275K, is going to end up having 2 more empty buildings in the City after this is complete, and rent to the State for 30 years for $0? Where do the taxpayers benefit from this? If I'm reading this right, why should us taxpayers agree to this?

    -- Posted by FNLYHOME on Fri, Feb 13, 2009, at 1:17 PM
  • Another fine way to conduct city business. Do all of this at the taxpayers expense. This happened in the past and will continue to do so until it is stopped. But, how can we stop this??? If we try to elect new council members, they will be out-voted and ones will be put in that will follow and not have opinions for the good of the city. Spend, spend, spend. That is what the city wants to do and "look good" for others to see. The city council better look at what they are doing. The population will continue to lessen and they will "cry wolf" again. They only have themselves to blame on this. $275K is alot of money. Why not use that for the "Keystone" project?? I'm sorry, another dead horse has shown up. And discuss what type of bonding will be used? In other words, figure out how to slip it into the citizens without them knowing they are getting screwed.

    Changing the ammendment for nuisance buildings is like a bill of goods. Why change it?? You, the city, has let the property at 511 East 6th go for 25+ years and not did a thing about it. Send them notice after notice and to no avail. Now you want to do this??? How nuts to you think the public is?? That place is in ruins. A coat of paint, clean out the yard, and cover the windows is supposed to make things OK??? If I can see this, more of this citizens who live here can see this also. Speak up!!! Go to the city council meetings and let your voice be heard!! People in McCook are not as stupid as you would like to think.

    What can the city do to you?? Only make it worse than it already is, so you move to another town and spend YOUR MONEY THERE instead of in McCook. Look how much the city will lose. All that tax money for utilities and such. Look at the future of this city. Soon, this place will be getting close to being a ghost town. More businesses and residences will be empty. Take a good long look, if you can take off the "rose colored glasses".

    -- Posted by edbru on Sat, Feb 14, 2009, at 9:29 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: