Board rescinds appointment

Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Dale Dueland is the first to take to the podium at Monday night' meeting of the McCook school board. The board took almost an hour and a half to rescind its earlier appointment of a new board member.

On a 3-2 vote, the McCook Public Schools board of education Monday evening rescinded its Nov. 10 action to name Gary Power to complete the two years remaining in the term of board member Greg Larson, who resigned in September.

Voting to cancel Power's appointment were Mike Gonzales, Tom Bredvick and Larry Shields. Voting "no" were Diane Lyons and Shane Messersmith.

Shields -- who assured citizens, "I have listened tonight" -- cast the single vote Monday evening that differed from the Nov. 10 vote that appointed Power.

Shields, Lyons and Messersmith voted Nov. 10 for Power; Gonzales and Bredvick voted for Scott Johnson, who was the top point-getter in the seven-point ranking system recommended by the school district's attorney to narrow the field of seven candidates to the top two. Power came in second after winning a tie-breaker with Sandy Krysl.

The final vote on the appointment Nov. 10 was further evidence of a board seeming to split into two factions, as the same three board members defeated Gonzales' motion earlier in the meeting to add two more intramural sports at the junior high.


Thirteen citizens in an audience of about 160 spoke Monday evening at the special board meeting called to discuss one topic and one topic only -- the possibility of rescinding the Nov. 10 vote that caused such a stir around the community. The special meeting was requested by Bredvick and Shields, who felt the board needed to revisit its Nov. 10 actions, and allow the public to voice its concerns and board members to explain their actions.

Acting president/vice president Larry Shields said speakers would be limited to one opportunity to speak and to five minutes or less each, and no personal attacks or hostile conduct would be tolerated. "You should be further advised that there is no legal protection for any comments that are made," Shields said.

Several speakers told board members that they had nothing against Power, but were upset with board actions that resulted in his appointment. Dale Dueland told board members that he thought the board could have taken "some giant steps toward board unity" in appointing Scott Johnson, for whom even Lyons and Messersmith had cast the best vote -- a 1 -- in the initial voting process. Dueland said, in a prepared statement, "With all due respect to Mr. Power, I ... found it frustrating and hard to believe that this board had passed over what I felt were several more qualified applicants."

Maury Green, who was elected to a school board vacancy in the Nov. 4 general election, said he, too, has nothing against Gary Power. "What bothers me the most," Green said, "is the appearance of impropriety that the board created with its actions and with its vote."

The board's attempt to "sidestep" the recommendation from the school district's attorney regarding the process to fill Larson's vacancy, Green said, "created distrust in the public and from the public," and further actions by the board "created the appearance of disregard for the opinions of other board members and disrespect for the applicants through the process of shuffling numbers around to get the desired results."

Green reiterated that, "this has nothing whatsoever to do with Gary Power," but said that the actions by the board and the procedure by which the board filled Larson's position, "did nothing other than create a great deal of distrust in this board, and for that purpose alone -- the procedure, not the end result -- the board ought to reconsider its actions taken two weeks ago."

Mindy Saafeld told board members that the Nov. 10 vote has broken the community's trust in the school board. Saafeld said that she does not know Power, but encouraged the board to rescind its action and appoint its top choice to help restore trust in the community and move the school district in the right direction. She encouraged the board to listen to the public and "move forward, instead of staying stagnant."

Jerry Reitz told board members, "You're playing politics. We can see that." He told the board to support the district's teachers and administrators, and to set policies. "You've got the best set of educators, and an unbelievable administration. Let the teachers teach. Don't play politics," Reitz said. "Let the teachers teach. Give (them) the tools to teach, and stay out of their way. That's your job."

Kay Flaska asked for a show of hands of those in the crowd who supported the decision of the board two weeks ago. Five hands went up when she asked who supported those board actions; too many hands to count went up when she asked who did not support the previous decision of the board.

Superintendent Dave Schley said that what the school "is going through tonight is not good. It shouldn't be happening. We're about kids ... kids, kids, kids, kids. I'm asking everyone to put a stop to this, and focus on kids and learning."

He encouraged the board to come to a consensus and agree to move forward. "My hope and prayer is that you will move forward as a school system, for the kids and for the teachers," Schley said.

Acting president/vice president Larry Shields made a "last call" for more public comment at 6:57 p.m., and closed the comment session at 6:58 p.m.

Bredvick's motion to rescind the board's action on Nov. 10 resulted in an extended silence as all waited for a second. Gonzales' second and Shields' acceptance of the motion and second opened board discussion of the motion.

Lyons defended her original vote for Power, saying that rescinding Power's appointment now would be assuming that there is some reason that Mr. Power is a less likely candidate or person to serve on the board of education now than he was two weeks ago.

She noted that Power attended workshops at the state school boards convention in Omaha last week on his own time. "He is actually a better candidate now than he was two weeks ago because he has educated himself," Lyons said, to laughter from the audience.

Lyons said she voted for Power because she has known him 15 to 20 years. She said he is an analytical thinker and is fiscally conservative. He was involved in sports in high school and in college, taught four years of science in a senior high school in Los Angeles, and has been a substitute teacher in McCook. She said he attends board meetings and asks questions. "He ran for the board of education twice. He cares very much about children in our system," she said. "I see nothing objectionable about Gary. He is a good person. He is his own person, and I think he will do a wonderful job on this board."

Shields' voice rose as he said that no one approached him with their support for any particular school board candidate before the Nov. 10 vote, and he voted his own conscience at the Nov. 10 meeting.

Gonzales cut off Shields' criticism of "people who hide behind their damned computers, their cell phones and call in on radio stations and think they're anonymous ... that's baloney ... people who aren't man enough ..." saying his comments didn't address the meeting's topic -- whether or not to rescind the board's Nov. 10 vote.

Lyons wanted the board to be able to make public comment, but Bredvick reminded her that state statute prohibits changing the agenda within 24 hours and keeps the board from discussing anything except what's on the agenda ... "discuss the motion at hand," Bredvick said.

Shields encouraged healing, promoting "forgiveness and forgetness ... forgive and then forget." He said, "And I guess I have listened tonight."

Messersmith called the board, "five different individuals ... we did have five different votes on the situation." He explained that he judged the board position candidates on their eye contact, whether they have kids in the school system and whether they have the same views that he has.

He assured those present that there were "no behind-the-scenes gatherings ... no politics. Our votes weren't identical."

Messersmith said that it was unfortunate that "somebody got upset because the vote didn't go his direction."

Bredvick said that on the issue of the appointment and its process, "the community spoke loudly to me and repetitively to me, and I had to bring it forward. Dividing the community is not ... NOT my calling in life. I will not make a decision in my best interest. I'll make a decision in the community's best interest."

Gonzales said his "was not a personal agenda," but he instead attacked the voting process that he said, "got flawed intentionally."

Lyons asked what he meant by "flawed intentionally," and then she explained that the process by which the board ranked candidates was difficult to understand and very confusing.

Lyons said that Gary Power and Scott Johnson were the two best qualified after listening to the candidates. "Did I think the other candidates deserve sixes and sevens?" Lyons questioned. "No, but it was the only way to get to discuss the best two."

She called the process flawed, "not the best way to decide." She said there was "no perfect way to do this, especially with seven great candidates."

"Did it stink?" she questioned. "I think it did. I wish there was a better way to do it," adding that she wished the discussion of candidates could have been in closed session.

Bredvick suggested looking into the cost -- a "guesstimate," he said, of $5,600 -- of a special election of District 17 patrons to find a replacement for Larson, saying that an election would be a show of faith in the community. Bredvick said the board itself has a budget that most likely has enough in it to pay for a special election.

Schley told Shields that yes, appointing Scott Johnson is one option to fill the vacancy. It would have to be done at a subsequent meeting, Shields said, as an appointment is not on the special meeting's agenda.

Jerry Reitz stood, saying he would donate $1,000 to help fund a special election, adding that he feels others would donate whatever other funding is needed. "The people then seated would be voted in, and there would be no issues with this board," Reitz said.

Lyons and Messersmith voted "no" in quick succession on Bredvick's motion to rescind the Nov. 10 action. Then Larry Shields leaned forward and said, tersely, "It's a democratic process" ... and sat. Folding his hands ... unfolding them. Sitting back, sitting forward. Fifty-one seconds later, "Yes," he said.

Bredvick and Gonzales each voted "yes."

The motion to rescind the Nov. 10 action passed, 3-2.

The crowd applauded.

The board's next meeting will be Monday, Dec. 8.

The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.

Comments
View 29 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Wow, McCook. How shameful. Do you really think that if you would not have held this witch hunt that things would have gone to hell in a handbasket? How ridiculous. Mr. Power would have worked hard and put the kids first. While you great civic volunteers pass the hat to fund the special election, please strongly consider reimbursing Mr. Power for the costs associated with attending the Omaha workshops. [And maybe a spine for Mr. Shields.] An apology would also be in order for the public humiliation. Maybe an apology does not fit with Mr. Bredvick's calling. Or maybe it would be prohibited by state statute.

    -- Posted by Viking on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 1:23 PM
  • Viking,

    I would surely donate to reimburse Mr. Power. It would be the 2nd best money I ever spent. Now...where could we send money to get you to go away?

    The process was flawed - and intentionally taken advantage of. Anyone who saw the score cards could see that. If you don't believe me, here is your proof: "Did I think the other candidates deserve sixes and sevens?" Lyons questioned. "No, but it was the only way to get to discuss the best two." It was the only way to discuss HER best two. She intentionally tried to circumvent the process by giving either a 1 or a 7, and Mr. Messersmith may as well have been copying off of her card because they were almost identical in their scoring of candidates.

    Last night was a step in the right direction to fix a situation that occured because of the poor judgement of a few of the board members. Last night three of the board members took action to rectify the situation. In the next election, I hope the public will go even further to make the necessary changes to put better representation on the school board.

    Thank you Mr. Bredvick, Mr. Gonzales, and Mr. Shields for listening to the public and making this possible. Now put this to a special election and let the community decide.

    -- Posted by Husker23 on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 2:53 PM
  • Husker23,

    Glad to hear you are in a charitable mood. As for the best money you have ever spent, I am doing fine so thanks, but no thanks. I also have a right to my opinion. I have a problem with the way Mr. Power was treated, plain and simple. Not because he will not be a board member, although I think he would have worked hard and done a decent job (honestly people, it is not brain surgery), but because of how this played out in the public arena (e.g., the motion to rescind passed... the crowd applauded). No one should have to experience that. How do you not take something like this personally? Those who put the wheels in motion (let's be fair and include those current members who many say may have manipulated the system in the first place which helped to bring about the meeting) should be ashamed. By the way, how much money were you talking about?????

    -- Posted by Viking on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 4:29 PM
  • this episode is the end result of a group of people that appear to be very divided, on most everything. It is very obvious who is "with' whom. Maybe put all 5 of them (well I guess Mike has one more meeting and he is gone), include Maury Green in that group and make them sit together holding hands until they can get along. (Just like we would do with a group of children that were fighting.)

    I'm not saying they have to agree ALL the TIME BUT they need to agree to disagree and move forward.

    They don't even appear to respect each other so how can we expect them to work together for our children. Inappropriate behavior by any adult sitting on our school board should be addressed by the patrons of this district. Mr. Shields may need to take some anger management classes as well as etiquette classes.

    Healing is needed, forgiveness is needed but also some growing up and education is also needed. These folks all need to know what their job is NOT what they think it is.

    I was proud to have served on the Board, I would definitely have a problem saying that with this group.People, grow up and act like the responsible adults you are suppose to be.

    -- Posted by BarbO on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 4:51 PM
  • Oh, Viking! Get real. You can't possibly think that what took place on November 10th was fair to any one of the candidates! Lyons and Messersmith intentionally screwed up a perfectly decent voting system. Bredvick and Gonzales were the only individuals on that board last night who showed any intelligence and respect toward the community or the teachers and students they serve. Lyons made a joke of herself and she and Messersmith should both be ashamed of their behavior last night and on the 10th. It was nice to see Shields listen to the 160 in attendance last night and do the right thing. There were several people who spoke in opposition of the voting process that occurred on the 10th, including an 8th grader who obviously has more common sense than Diane Lyons and Shane Messersmith! Now it's time to move on and get the member on the board who actually won on the 10th -that is, if he's still willing. If I had to work with Lyons and Messersmith, I would be inclined to pass. The only thing is, he might be one of the few on the board actually working for the good of the kids. Kids, kids, kids!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 5:34 PM
  • After last night, I have the utmost respect for Tom Bredvick and Mike Gonzales for the way they handled themselves. They restrained from the nonsence and remained professional. I wouldn't same the same for Messersmith or Shields, and I'm not sure what to think about Lyons, although I was definitely not impressed.

    Viking, you're evidently under the same impression that those three board members are -- that all of this was a personal attack on Gary Power. That's not it! I'm sure it is hard not to take this personal, and I'm sorry that he does (or that you do), but the process was flawed. There's no reason that the #1 candidate shouldn't be on the board. If Gary Power has any conscience at all, he would feel the same way.

    It's obvious to everyone that those three board members need to put their personal agendas aside and be fair. That's all we ask... and then we can forgive. I'm not so sure we'll forget.

    -- Posted by What I think... on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 8:56 PM
  • I know what to think about Lyons . . . she just doesn't get it! After sitting there listening to the 13 individuals speak in opposition of the flawed Nov. 10th process, hearing the cheers in favor to rescind the prior decision, the moans of the crowd when she went on and on and on about what a good person she believes Gary Powers is (which wasn't even the issue), seeing the show of hands . . . and she (& her sidekick) still voted "no". I'm starting to think a recall of her (& her sidekick's) position on the board may be the better way to go. I hate to sound bitter but I have no patience for ignorance and the board of education is definitely no place for it! It's obvious in her little contentious world that it's her way or no way! I'm seriously worried about my children's future in this school system if she remains on the board!

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Tue, Nov 25, 2008, at 10:21 PM
  • I'm sure Mr.Power would do things in the best intrest of the kids. Is there any way we can give him and Mike, diane and shane's postions on the board?

    -- Posted by ddt4mccook on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 1:26 AM
  • ddt4! What a wonderful idea! I believe it would have to be done by petition somehow. I intend to research the matter further. See everyone on December 8th!

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 7:00 PM
  • There are two videos (part 1 and 2) of the special board meeting on the Gazette homepage. I just watched part 2 and am completely disgusted with the way the three handled themselves:

    1) Lyons trying to gain more support for Power saying he's a better candidate now than he was two weeks ago because he attended seminars in Lincoln, blah, blah, blah... (No wonder Power is taking this personal -- she's trying to make it personal.) And who told him to go to those seminars anyway? Maybe SHE should reimburse him for his troubles. His credentials are not the reason that meeting was called. (And then the fact that she goes on, and on, and on... UGH!)

    2) Messersmith basically accusing one board member that the reason we're there is because "the vote didn't go his way"... If that was the case, why were there 160+/- concerned citizens there!?!

    3) Sheilds proceeding to give the audience hell was one thing, but the glares he shot towards the end of the table were absolutely ridiculous and totally unprofessional! However, he did come through in the end, so I suppose I should be willing to "forgive and forget".

    I'll say it again... This is not a personal matter against Power. Concerned citizens are disgusted with how the voting process was handled. However, I believe some of the comments made by at least one board member were fueled by Power himself. (So think twice before wishing he could serve our children!)

    To the board, the #1 candidate --YOUR #1 CANDIDATE-- should have gotten the position on the board! Plain and simple.

    I urge you all (board members included) to view the video, even if you were at the meeting... It's enlightening!

    -- Posted by What I think... on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 8:43 PM
  • This story reminds me of a big pile of dog poop in your yard. Everyone knows it's there, but nobody scoops it up and gets rid of it, thus solving the problem. Instead everyone tries to ignore it and runs from their responsibility. The school board acts like they are trying to run from something. What are they running from?

    -- Posted by Hugh Jassle on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 10:42 PM
  • Great Job Mike and Tom, you both were professional as always. I am sorry that you have spoiled brats to work with and hopefully the public will now offer you support and recall these three board members. It was clear to all that were in attendance that they have no desire to work together.

    I applaud the patrons that stood up and spoke that night. They all conducted themselves professionally; too bad I can't say the same of Lyons, Messersmith or Shields.

    Mrs. Lyons just doesn't get it. This had nothing to do with Mr. Powers, but everything to do with their actions in the voting. But nothing is ever her fault, or Shane's or Larry's. They each blame someone else. Mrs. Lyons tried to pin it on Mr. Haney saying he told her how to vote. If you can't figure out that a 1 is good and a 7 is poor you shouldn't be on the board. As for Messersmith, he personally pointed the finger at another board member. As for voting someone high because they make eye contact, please. He can look you right in the eye and still not speak a word of truth. Oh and let's not forget Mr. Shields who bashed the public. What was it he said at the beginning of this meeting; no personal attacks or hostile conduct would be tolerated. Apparently they can sidestep those instructions as they are the 3 Board members. As for the public not contacting these 3 to voice their concerns, why would we you are the problem and you can't be trusted.

    Shields reluctantly voted with Bredvick and Gonzales to rescind the vote, but it was clear that he really did not want to do so.

    The vote was rescinded and I for one think we need a public vote to fill the vacancy of Mr. Larson. In addition we need to sign a recall petition to remove these 3 board members from office. If this has to go on the ballot then lets do them both together.

    If you were not at the meeting please view the video that the Gazette has on their website and encourage everyone you know to watch it as well. Thanks Connie Jo and Sheri for the great reporting.

    -- Posted by emidge on Wed, Nov 26, 2008, at 11:34 PM
  • Dear Chunky Peanut Butter - I'm doing a little research on how to scoop the poop. I believe a petition can be generated to remove certain school board members but we have to wait 6 months on Lyons since she was (sadly) just re-elected. (I can't help but think if the same person who stole the 50 signs Maury Green put out had stolen the signs displayed by Diane Lyons, we wouldn't be in this mess right now.)

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, at 8:46 AM
  • ddt4mccook and MakingApoint,

    I like your idea of getting Mike Gonzales back on the Board. Does anyone know if he is willing?

    -- Posted by tsbison80 on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, at 1:48 PM
  • MakingApoint-

    I understand that you are upset with people but do you have to attack them? I think all 5 of the people on the board got on the board for the right reasons. All 5 have made great decisions at one time or another. You are free to have your opinion but I do not feel you should attack people in the process, we are all human, you have even attacked me in this blog and I just have stated my opinion. Do I not have the right to that? We all have that right, but come on, healing will not start until those of you attacking people stop.

    I myself have fought the board, but did it openly and PROFESSIONALLY at the board meeting and through letters. I didn't get everything I wanted and was upset with a few board memebers in the process but I DID NOT ATTACK THEM.

    If you want to recall then start a recall, but stop the name calling, bad mouthing and pointing fingers as I am growing tired of that. I know for a fact you have taught your kids to act better than that. Or at least I hope.

    -- Posted by McCook Gal on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, at 4:27 PM
  • McCook Gal, I don't see anyone "attacking" anyone in this blog. Just people voicing our concerns, opinions, and even facts. (Unless you're referring to the statements made regarding the two citizens that spoke to the board at the special meeting? If so, I agree that those types of statements, which are totally unrelated to the current problem at hand, should never have been brought up, but that wasn't posted by MakingApoint.)

    And Meshedup and Viking, you do realize that the point of the special meeting wasn't to prove that Power was or wasn't qualified for the position, right?

    I thought the special meeting was a great opportunity for the citizens of McCook to discuss the matter openly with the board, and I'm sure it took great courage for Bredvick and Shields to call it. And you know, the board may have followed the process at the Nov. 10 meeting, but it was obviously flawed when the #1 man didn't get the job. I agree with MakingApoint... It wasn't fair to ANY of the other candidates (and at least 160+/- of us could see that).

    Here's hoping you'll all show your support for the board at the December 8 meeting!

    -- Posted by What I think... on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, at 9:37 PM
  • Welcome back, McCook Gal! Whoops! I'm assuming you're referring to my calling Shane, Diane's "sidekick". So sorry! Other than that, I haven't called anyone names unless you're referring to my observation in a prior blog that you may be either Messersmith's or Shields' wife. You can call it name calling if you see it that way. I apologized in advance (if I was wrong) in the prior blog. Or maybe you've mistaken me for Viking who indirectly referred to Mr. Shields as spineless in the very first comment to this article? (Although, you gotta hand it to Shields last Monday for finally growing a backbone and listening to the public).

    Furthermore, the only 'attacks' on this particular blog I have seen are those directed toward Mindy Saafeld and Jerry Reitz which are not relevant to the real issue. However, you are absolutely right ... we're all entitled to our own opinions and free to express them AND all 5 board members HAVE made great decisions at one time or another. But not this time and it could prove to be detrimental.

    I have a few questions for you, McCook Gal. Do you think what happened on November 10th was fair to anyone? And, if so, to whom??? Also,do you understand what the real issue is?

    tsbison80 - I can't answer your question. I don't know why Gonzales would want the frustration of working with Lyons, Messersmith or Shields any further but I truly believe he has always had our kids' best interests at heart. That alone might be enough to convince him to run again, if that were ever a possibility. I believe Bredvick is an excellent board member and I think Maury Green will do well. But, again, the wrongs can't be corrected if you have 3 other members on the board unwilling to listen to the concerns of the parents, teachers, community and students and work with those members who are willing.

    The comments expressed herein are not intended to offend any other individual who may, or may not be, expressing their concerns about the same issue or any other issue. They are simply the personal observations of the writer in regard to the school board issue and in response to comments directed toward the writer and this article. (Silly that a disclaimer be required to post a comment?!?!)

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, at 11:36 PM
  • We laughed until we cried…… then we cried for McCook

    Yesterday our family gathered to celebrate and give thanks for the many blessing that we enjoy. After a wonderful meal we started talking about the good old days when someone asked if anyone had been following the stories in the Gazette about the McCook School Board, a school that I had always been proud to claim. I hated to admit that I had been following the story, but hadn't really kept up. They were trying to explain to us what happened at last Monday nights board meeting. When we didn't believe them they suggested that we read the story for our self on the Gazettes' web site. That is when we discovered that the Gazette had posted a video of the meeting.

    I know the Gazette has been accused of not reporting the facts as they actually happen, after watching the video I don't know if anyone could describe what happened. Even seeing it for myself it's hard to believe.

    After Gonzales makes his statement that the voting process during the previous meeting had been flawed intentionally, Mrs. Lyons, not once, but several times demands to know what he meant. Then not only does she admit that she, Mr. Messersmith and Mr. Shields' conspired to fix the selection process, she explains how they did it and tries to make an excuse of why they felt that they had to do it. Then she tries to blame a member of the administration for what happened, shame on you Mrs. Lyons. After the 160 people in the audience didn't buy her story, Mr. Messersmith decided to give it a try. I will agree eye contact is important, but what a person says and does is also important. If you truly made your decision on if the candidate had or has had children attend school in McCook then I don't believe Mr. Bennett deserved a 6 or 7. Mr. Bennett had more than one child graduate from McCook, he has had grandchildren graduate from McCook and he has a daughter in law that not only graduated from McCook but is a long term employee in the system. When the public didn't buy this you tried to attack Mr. Gonzales personally, kudos to those in the audience that responded to that low blow and to Mr. Gonzales for keeping your cool although I'm not sure how you were able to do that. At the beginning of the meeting Mr. Shields read a statement warning the public not to get out of control, I am sorry but I didn't see or hear any of the members of the audience swear or lose control, I am not sure why Mr. Gonzales saved you Mr. Shields by stopping you.

    To Mr. Bredvick and Mr. Gonzales, thank you for staying in control, very professional. Thank you for not joining in the madness, even when being personally attacked. You would think that after four years of board service Mrs. Lyons would have known that State Statue does allow you to add items to the agenda, as was explained by Mr. Bredvick. Not only did she admit to fixing the vote at the last meeting she tried to manipulate this meeting.

    Although I do appreciate Mr. Shields doing what was right and changing his vote, 51 seconds to decide what is right? When I was a child I remember watching cartoons when porky pig was trying to make a decision, he had an angel on one shoulder and the devil on the other. The two characters would argue trying to get porky to do their biding. I am glad the angel won this time, but what happens next time.

    Of course we couldn't watch the video just once, we had to watch it several time and we laughed until we cried until someone reminded us that this was our school, a school system that we had always been proud of, a system that many of us have relatives attending, a system that we have friends and family working in.

    Our tears of laughter turned to tears for McCook.

    -- Posted by Opinion101 on Fri, Nov 28, 2008, at 11:41 AM
  • WoW!! What happen to my comments? It's funny that Making a Point can say what ever she wants to about Lyon, Messersmith and Sheilds but nobody can make a comment about Bredvicks or Gonzales. Are you all sure that McCook Gazette isn't being a little BIAS?

    I've been following this with out making any comments but maybe the town of McCook should really know who is behind all this. And you say that there was 160 people at the meeting how sure are you that they weren't all there to support Powers and the School boards choice? I maybe wrong but did 160 people actually speak?

    How sure are you that Gonzales & his family aren't stirring the pot just so he can get back on the Board?

    -- Posted by tsbison80 on Fri, Nov 28, 2008, at 7:28 PM
  • ts, your post and makingapoint's subsequent reply was deleted. I'm betting because of your offensive comment. Not sure why makingapoint's reply was removed. There is still one reply on this page that needs removed, but since the person making the comment works for the Gazette I doubt it will (but that is unrelated to topic of the article).

    As for your comment about the 160 or so people at the meeting, have you read the article you are now making comments on or have viewed the 2 videos on the Gazette homepage? Both spell out pretty clearly how the people in the audience felt.

    -- Posted by norm on Fri, Nov 28, 2008, at 7:38 PM
  • First off yes I read articles, yes I viewed the video's. Of course all the articles have been wrote by the Gazette reporter that has been somewhat bias. By sitting among 160 people did you see 160 people speak? Yes I did hear a lot of noise and rude people speaking that were not up to the stand. How about the quite one's that were there just to see what was really going on? Beens you think I am so uninformed could you or someone explain to me how this really come about? Now Why did the Pres. resign? And why all of a sudden Lyon, Messersmith and Sheilds are the bad guys? Oh Yea Sheilds isn't the bad guy now. Beens he broke to the presure of a few certain people making big waves to get things their way. Of course they can now talk about his temper. But wouldn't it tick you off if a few select people were writing things about you on the internet and talking on the radio. People can talk real big when they are not face to face.

    I personally think that Mr Gonzales and his family have done a bang up job of stirring the pot. Just hope that pot doesn't boil over on you.

    -- Posted by tsbison80 on Fri, Nov 28, 2008, at 10:26 PM
  • Lori (Gonzales)aka MakingApoint,

    Truth got your tongue?

    -- Posted by tsbison80 on Sat, Nov 29, 2008, at 10:13 AM
  • Sorry, Shane. I wasn't trying to ignore or avoid you. What needs to be said has been said and it's time to move on. This isn't between me and you (although we are both entitled to our opinion). This is between the board and those the board has vowed to be responsible for in the community. Have a good weekend!

    (By the way, I know your inside source).

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Sat, Nov 29, 2008, at 10:23 AM
  • MakingAPoint

    My name is not Shane. Althought I could see why you would want it to be him. Then he could be considered just like you. If you really think this all should move on why are you still checking the site.

    Please remember next time you start writing things what you just said. The Board has vowed to be responsible for the community. Maybe the Board knows More to the stories than what everyone else does. Sometimes maybe they don't reveal all the stories on the internet and radio. Maybe the sisters should try to stay out of some things and let the Board do what they think is right. Once again I am not Shane. But I do know when people are stirring trouble they sure don't like to do it in a public way. Its much easier to hide behind computers and behind closed doors or the phone. I have no intentions of writing on this any more. But if you would really like to move on maybe you should shut off your computer. P.S. Sometimes you have to go against the norm or against everyone to do the job right. A YES man never helps turn things around and make them right.

    -- Posted by tsbison80 on Sat, Nov 29, 2008, at 1:35 PM
  • Tb,

    I would like not only to address you but anyone which feels that the process that occurred on Nov. 10th was fair. In my eyes the parties involved are not the issue so there will be no personal attacks, rest assured. My concern is the same as many others have expressed and I have yet to be satisfied with an actual answer. My question is: Was the process to appoint a school board candidate fair and if so please explain. That's it, no more. From what I have gathered the highest scored applicant was not appointed and to put this in perspective I would like to put it in a similar scenario. It was said that "This is not brain surgery" but what if it were... would you like the top scored surgeon to be put aside and go with a surgeon that looked you in the eye to work on your child? If so why? This is my question and I would ask anyone which defends the November 10th process in a proactive manner to explain. So as to take away any concern as to my anonymity allow me to be clear... I am BRETT SCHMIDT... my phone is (308) 340 6216... and my wife and I are formidable contributors to the McCook Public School census along with tax payers. I assure you... "I DO deserve an explicit answer to my question. No need to respond to this on the comments page, please give me a call directly if you wish, if not please don't condemn anyone else for "Hiding behind a computer screen."

    Sincerely, Brett Schmidt

    -- Posted by MakingApoint on Sat, Nov 29, 2008, at 3:50 PM
  • Well, that quieted things down.

    -- Posted by norm on Mon, Dec 1, 2008, at 7:26 PM
  • please tell me how to find the videos? I would like to see what people are referring to when they are talking about the conduct demonstrated by our school board members. All I can find is the one on the elementary salute to veterans. Maybe they have been removed? Thanks, in advance.

    -- Posted by BurntToast on Fri, Dec 5, 2008, at 3:59 PM
    Response by McCook:
    The videos were knocked off the site by a software upgrade. We are in the process of returning them to the site, but it will take a few days.
  • So what if it is prohibited, your community allows it as in an open or closed meeting. No repercussions have happened to them for not following state statues. What a sham, I would be embarrassed to be affiliated with the McCook Public Schools. Apologies shologies--- I don't think there noses could be lowered for that. Pompas *****.

    -- Posted by edukator on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, at 7:13 PM
  • Barb O pipe down, they can't be trusted, don't follow the state statues, don't know when to have an open or closed meeting-get real! What an embarassment to McCook, they owe more than one person an apology!!!!!!

    -- Posted by edukator on Fri, Jan 30, 2009, at 7:32 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: