*

Mike Hendricks

Mike at Night

Mike Hendricks recently retires as social science, criminal justice instructor at McCook Community College.

Opinion

Seal Team Six

Friday, May 6, 2011

They're called the best of the best and the baddest of the bad. Of all the Special Ops forces that currently operate in our Armed Forces, the SEALs (sea, air, and land) are the elite. And this special team, Team Six, which was formed in 1980 in the aftermath of the failed attempt to rescue American hostages in Iran, has been the go-to team for the toughest missions since.

The team is so secret and special that our government will not publicly acknowledge its existence and no member of the team is allowed to ever talk about it or the missions they carry out to anyone. They allegedly have trained for the past month in Afghanistan using a full scale mock-up of bin-Laden's compound.

If this sounds cloak-and-dagger, it is, but in today's world of terrorism and having no idea who you can trust, it has to be.

This is the team that dropped into Osama bin-Laden's compound in Pakistan from helicopters and carried out a "kill not capture" assignment that was perhaps the most important they've ever conducted.

That's the part I want to talk about.

There's always going to be criticism, regardless of what you say or what you do. I discovered that early on in column writing. I wrote things I thought no one could be offended by but someone always was. Every part of life is like that and as the stakes increase, so does the criticism.

I've heard since the attack that bin Laden should have been captured instead of killed and put on trial, like the war criminals from Germany after World War II were, because we live by the rule of law and to kill instead of capture lowers us to the level of the enemy we're fighting.

Although I agree with this perspective in principle, I've also learned that you can't always fight fair. A situation is what it is and you have to do what you have to do to make sure you win and that you accomplish your mission.

Capturing bin Laden would have created a multitude of problems, headaches, differing opinions and controversy too. Where would he have been jailed? How would he have been interrogated? What kind of trial would he have had? And would he have ever said anything at all to aid the United States in combating terrorism?

President Bush, shortly after 9/11, ordered bin-Laden to be hunted down and captured dead or alive after thousands of innocent Americans died at his hands and that's eventually what happened. Osama bin-Laden took full credit for the untold number of tragedies that occurred on that day and other days since and our government and military never gave up on finding him and prosecuting him, regardless of whether the prosecution was bullets or court briefs.

So this 10-year old chapter is finally closed. Osama bin Laden is dead and he will never be able to lay claim to the taking of another innocent life in defense of his misguided interpretation of the Qur'an.

And that's a good thing.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Mike, I agree with most of your article, except that about the primary function is to arrest, not kill. You are correct, when addressing a Police Force searching for a person who killed another person (singular or a few), but in this case we are talking about War, and in War, at least as I was trained, you kill the enemy, where he stands, unless he wants to surrender. Then, and only then, do you shift, from kill on sight, to arrest if possible, (((but))) only when arrest can be made without additional hazard to the arresting party, or parties.

    I speak to the context of the situation. Bin Laden, being arrested, would make transport difficult, and extremely dangerous for Seal Team Six. ST-6 did right.

    That's how I see it.

    -- Posted by Navyblue on Fri, May 6, 2011, at 3:03 PM
  • Confident that best case scenario would have been to capture bin Laden alive. Further, I trust the judgement of Seal Team 6 doing what had to be done at the time. bin Laden's own people have confirmed his death, on with the war/defense against terrorism. See no need to stir the bin Laden pot any more, the less we say, the sooner he fades in to the dust bin of history where he can take his place among the historical maniacs such as Hitler. Do see a great need to be vigilant against more attacks by the terrorists.

    Thanks to the hard work of all those involved in making this resolution possible, from George Bush to Barrack Obama and every person involved in seeing this mission to conclusion just want to say THANK YOU ALL.

    -- Posted by ontheleftcoast on Fri, May 6, 2011, at 3:46 PM
  • Dear Mike,

    I would like to first say that your article was very interesting. You are spot-on, on how our forces executed their duties when the conducted the raid on UBL. Sometimes the public tend to forget that the Military is not a Law Enforcement group. These guys are some of the best at what they do and because they are expected to go above and beyond when making critical decisions. However I'm curious as to how you came about your facts in paragraph one. Were you a former SEAL and can speak on that subject or are you a viewer of the military channel? There are many Special Ops Units that operate in our great military, with their own specific tasks. Some are subordinate to others but they fight hand-in-hand. Please don't discredit them for the sake of an article.

    V/r

    Retired09Army

    -- Posted by Retired09Army on Wed, May 11, 2011, at 3:47 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: