Editorial

Will marijuana follow in the footsteps of same-sex marriage?

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

If history is any guide, it just might.

Libertarian-leaning Republican Rand Paul slipped in the back door and didn't talk about the elephant in the room, but he did listen to 40 donors at a marijuana industry trade show in Denver last month.

Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz said they used pot in their youth, and join Rick Perry in saying the legalization of marijuana should be left up to the states -- even it's a bad idea, according to Perry.

Hillary Rodham Clinton says more research is needed on marijuana's medical value, and it should be available under "appropriate circumstances," and her liberal Democratic rival Sen. Bernie Sanders said he "coughed a lot" the two times he tried pot in the old days.

We've gone from the days when Bill Clinton admitted he smoked pot but "didn't inhale," to Barack Obama's unqualified admission that he smokd a joint on more than one occasion.

The legalization lobbying group, Marijuana Policy Project, plans to donate tens of thousands of dollars to 2016 presidential candidates, but it's hard to tell just how much of an influence the industry will have. Many pot-business owners don't list their businesses on campaign finance disclosure forms because marijuana is still illegal under federal law.

And, more marijuana lobbying money is likely to go to the six-to-10 states that are likely to have some sort of marijuana question on the ballots next year.

What a change from the days when President Clinton signed the national Defense of Marriage Act, and candidate Obama was clear that marriage involved one man and one woman.

Last week the White House was bathed in rainbow colors after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states.

Sadly, the majority of our candidates for national office are not reluctant to sell their moral convictions to the highest bidder.

Given our campaign finance laws and the growing influence of the marijuana industry lobby -- pun intended -- how long will it be before candidates hold up a moistened finger to determine which way the wind is blowing the blue-tinged smoke to determine their next direction?

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Probably the best format to discuss moral convictions would be in the beer gardens at most of our local fairs and other events. Drop the kids off at the Merry-go-round and join the other folks for some good old fashioned alcohol consumption. We all know the problems associated with alcohol, yet we still choose to ignore them. Many people have made the choice they consider to be less harmful than alcohol - I wouldn't call that a lack of morals, more likely just a wise decision.

    -- Posted by Geezer on Tue, Jul 14, 2015, at 6:13 PM
  • It is stupid not to legalize it and tax it.

    -- Posted by plainsman on Wed, Jul 15, 2015, at 8:57 AM
  • Just legalize it, keep government out.

    -- Posted by Hugh Jassle on Wed, Jul 15, 2015, at 12:02 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: