[mccookgazette.com] Overcast ~ 37°F  
High: 54°F ~ Low: 35°F
Sunday, May 1, 2016

Irrigation districts file suit over NRDs' plans

Monday, December 31, 2012

LINCOLN, Nebraska -- Two Nebraska Irrigation Districts placed the state's water law policy at issue in filings made late Friday in the U.S. District Court. They seek a comprehensive decision on the right to waters in the Republican River Basin within Nebraska.

"The case is not the same as the Kansas lawsuit against Nebraska," said David Domina, a Nebraska lawyer for the districts.

"Kansas is suing about the entire River Basin from Colorado to Kansas. The irrigation districts are focused on what happens within one state -- Nebraska."

Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District, headquartered at Cambridge, and Bostwick Irrigation District in Nebraska, headquartered at Red Cloud, sued two Nebraska state officials, a Natural Resources Districts, and an entity formed by several NRDs. The suit also name the U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

The Irrigation Districts' 63-page Complaint asserts that plans approved by the State Department of Natural Resources would use an artificial "augmentation" process to achieve short-term compliance with Nebraska's obligations under the Republican River Compact. The districts claim the plan will deprive streams, rivers and federal lakes of water inflows to which they are entitled, and reduce future stream flow by pumping water from the aquifer.

"The districts believe we cannot solve the problem of too much groundwater pumping with more groundwater pumping," Domina said.

The suit attacks plans to spend $83 million to acquire 19,000 acres in Lincoln County, take the land out of production, and pump water from under it at least 8 miles, to be dumped into the Republican system. From there, about half the water is expected to evaporate and about half will flow out of Nebraska to Kansas.

The case also focuses on a pumping and piping project in the Upper Republican NRD area near Rock Creek.

"There are many problems with the augmentation plans," Domina said. First, the Lincoln County pumping site is located east of the greatest overuse of groundwater in Southwest Nebraska." Piping pumped water to increase main river flow will bypass federal lakes and surface user canals.

Recharge happens from these spots, not from piping water into the main stem of the rive. At the same time, overpumping will continue."

Second, excessive groundwater pumping in the driest area will continue. "The solution is less pumping in the driest areas were the most water is used for the least benefit. groundwater overpumping cannot be cured with more pumping, just like you can't borrow your way out of debt."

Third, Domina said "Mother Nature cannot be fooled. There is no such thing as paper water. Nebraska is in litigation with Kansas, and running into itself, because its officials believe in paper water. Paper water does not quench thirst."

In late October, the Nebraska DNR and four NRDs announced an $83 million Lincoln County land purchase from a Delaware investment group. Under the plan, the farm will be taken out of production and returned to pasture. New wells will be drilled. The new wells would pump water at least 8 miles to a Republican River tributary.

It will bypass the irrigation districts and the federal lakes in the Basin.

Federal Issues

In a prepared statement, the Districts' lawyer continued, "federal agencies and officials are sued to force the United States to meet its contractual obligations. The Districts have paid their bills, often by assessing their water patrons, even though there is no water to deliver."

Domina explained "The Irrigation Districts have contracts with the federal government. They have met their contracts. In turn, the Government agreed to supply water. Parts of the Irrigation Districts have been dry for several years, other parts have a trickle."

The United States is a signing party to the Republican River Compact along with the States of Kansas, Nebraska and Colorado. Disputes over Nebraska's groundwater pumping led to a lawsuit by Kansas against the State; it is pending in the United States Supreme Court. The Irrigation Districts are not able to be involved in that case.

The Nebraska State Constitution provides that the surface and groundwaters of Nebraska are to be used for Nebraskans. The priorities of use are (1) domestic users or humans, (2) agricultural users, and (3) industrial uses.

Domina concluded "The Irrigation Districts contend that Nebraska can use its share of waters in the Republican River Basin as those waters naturally occur. But, Nebraska cannot convert long-term groundwater to short-term surface water at the expense of its downstream citizens."


Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Thank Goodness..Lawsuits..bet this leads to some practical solutions...someday the state and the judges are going to get fed up with this BS and take all our local control away..then everyone in sw Nebraska will get screwed..at least the lawyers will get paid

-- Posted by omnibus on Tue, Jan 1, 2013, at 11:33 AM

Local control? What local control? For what purpose does the NRD place pumping restrictions on groundwater irrigators when groundwater irrigators in the upper and lower districts consistently do not comply to such restrictions to the tune of 20,000 acre feet in excess. Meanwhile the state continues to do business oblivious to the fact that there are any legal obligations to which they might be subject. All the while our lakes and rivers are bled dry courtesy of the DNR and NRD for that exact purpose... to steal away local control and give it to a wizard of smart bureaucrat in Lincoln, the likes of which need not worry of the insignificant, outnumbered voter out west about to be screwed.

-- Posted by shallal on Thu, Jan 3, 2013, at 1:26 AM

reduced pumping is the only real answer.

-- Posted by dennis on Thu, Jan 3, 2013, at 3:36 PM

Reduced pumping is not the only answer. Another answer is that the compact needs to be rewritten. Granted when it was originally written, there were very few irrigation wells. But In addition to that there were no terraces on farmland, and there were few if any pasture dams or pits to hold the runoff water. Both of which may not have occurred if not for government cost share in the construction of such. In addition to these two items which reduced stream flows, we have also embraced the no till cropping practice, which by the presence of crop residue on the surface of the soil, slows run off and allows more moisture penetration of the soil. This too reduced stream flows. Also, we have a lot more trees and vegetation on the rivers and creeks which in turn uses water that does make it to Kansas. Even if we didn't have any irrigation wells, I believe we would still be out of compliance with the current compact.

-- Posted by quick13 on Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 1:35 PM

Totally Agree

-- Posted by omnibus on Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 7:05 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Related subjects