[mccookgazette.com] Rain Fog/Mist ~ 38°F  
High: 45°F ~ Low: 37°F
Friday, Apr. 29, 2016

Equal opportunity for all

Friday, May 25, 2012

On Wednesday, two female soldiers filed suit to end the U.S. military's restrictions on women in combat. The women are Command Sgt. Maj. Jane Baldwin and Col. Ellen Haring, both currently Army Reservists.

The current restriction bars them from certain assignments solely on the basis of sex which includes infantry, armor and special operations units. Women make up 14.5 percent of active duty military personnel and more than 800 women have been injured and 130 killed in fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The only thing I'm surprised about is that the suit to address sex discrimination took so long. We've had the law preventing it on the books for a long time. France, Germany, Canada, Denmark, Norway and Switzerland already allow females to serve in all duty assignments and Israel and Great Britain allow them to serve in artillery roles.

Hanging on to this policy suggests sex discrimination exists not only in practice but in the mind as well. It implies that women are inferior to men; that there are some jobs women just can't do and it tacitly supports the age-old bias that a woman's preferred role is barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen.

I saw this attitude practiced on the Tulsa Police Department. In a 550-person police department, we had only three women commissioned as police officers and they were all assigned to the Youth Division as soon as they graduated from the police academy.

It was believed they simply weren't suited for patrol duty. It was thought they were small, sensitive and unable to confront the dangers that police officers on patrol confront daily. But once given the chance, the women proved the men wrong again, and today women serve in every area of police work and many towns and cities have women police chiefs. On the other hand, many men discovered they didn't have what it took to be effective police officers and were either dismissed or resigned.

Today, we see women working next to men in practically every job requiring strength, endurance, or bravery except combat roles in the military and hopefully, the suit filed by the two women in the military will rectify that. I know we'll hear "the sky is falling" rhetoric from those who still support the traditional role of the female but their voices become fewer and fewer as time marches on and sooner rather than later will be silenced forever. Our society must allow women the ability to compete for jobs at every level and the only thing restricting them will be their performance, not their sex, just like it has always been for men.

Since affirmative action became a reality, we've found that the old sex stereotypes just don't stand up to the light of day. There are a lot of 'men' that can't do so-called men's jobs and a lot of women that can.

Bias, discrimination, racism, sexism and prejudice will not end just because we pass a law making it illegal. We know that from the Civil Rights movement and the Women's movement fifty years ago. There are still many people in this country who, because of their own personal insecurities, continue to harbor those attitudes in their soul. But changing the law to make it illegal to practice those feelings is the first step toward doing away with them once and for all.

It's a step toward the future rather than hanging on to the past and that's a good thing.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

This is so not what Mike wrote.

-- Posted by AmberLea on Fri, May 25, 2012, at 3:12 PM
Response by Dawn Cribbs:
Oops. Thank you for the heads up! Now it should read correctly.


Are you devoid of facts? One of the many reasons civilized people kept women out of combat is to prevent the violent rapes that female prisoners endure. Woman POW's are brutalized by male captors.

The definition of a civilized race is one in which males can control their sex drives. Look around the World at the extent that religions have adopted to hide a woman's personal appearance to prevent rape.

Maybe you should actually research the history of war and millions of deaths and the extent of rape and torture.

Just look at the female reporter in Egypt that was virtually gang raped last year. That is a reality and civilized men know what uncivilized men are capable of. To send women into combat and to have them captured, raped and brutalized actually does seem like going back into the past by me.

I actually have no problem with women doing any job as anyone who knows me is well aware of. But you need to be honest about the brutality of War.

I suppose you think women should jog alone at 5 am in Houston because men do?

Read the history books and learn what the Germans did to Russian women. Learn what the Japanese did to the Chinese women in Manchuria.

-- Posted by wmarsh on Sat, May 26, 2012, at 7:57 AM


Please read on.

-- Posted by wmarsh on Sat, May 26, 2012, at 8:05 AM


Of the 80,000 POW's from Singapore over 70,000 died in camps. Roughly 10%-15% of the British deaths in WW2 were these POW's.

What this campaign and Corregidor prove is die fighting do not surrender.

-- Posted by wmarsh on Sat, May 26, 2012, at 8:13 AM


-- Posted by wmarsh on Sat, May 26, 2012, at 8:24 AM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Mike Hendricks
Mike at Night