[mccookgazette.com] Fair ~ 56°F  
High: 83°F ~ Low: 52°F
Thursday, May 5, 2016

Looking a gift horse in the mouth

Friday, February 10, 2012

A year ago Barack Obama was prime for the picking. The economy was in the tank and as James Carville proposed when Bill Clinton ran for President in 1992, "it's the economy, stupid" because people always vote their pocketbook. Combine the economy with all the character assassination charges being leveled at Obama by every right-wing critic on television and radio and it looked like he was a loser for sure in 2012.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the election. Republicans like Chris Christie and Jeb Bush who would have won the nomination and, most likely, the general election in a walk decided not to run and those who did have turned out to be less than stellar candidates. Mitt Romney, the accepted front-runner who's been running for President for six years in a row can't capture the conservative base of his party. The media assumed he would be the nominee after his significant win in the Florida primary but then he lost to Rick Santorum in the three contests held this past week. Santorum has now won four primaries, Romney three and Newt Gingrich one.

Santorum has emerged as the darling of the Religious Right of the party but their political influence has declined significantly since its hey-day in the '80s and '90s. Gingrich has never had a chance anywhere but in the southern states and the reasons are far too many to mention in a column but one big one is his desire to colonize the moon. Ron Paul is much more Libertarian than Republican and has yet to win a primary.

The Republicans decided this year that the best way to select a candidate was through a long series of debates and it has been the debates themselves that has cast doubt on the abilities of any of the candidates instead of crowning a contender the way they were supposed to. Remember that Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, burst onto the scene in a big way and for a couple of weeks, was thought to be the one the Republicans needed to defeat Obama. But because of terrible debate performances, his numbers dropped like a rock and he eventually left the race. Now the latest polling amazingly shows him trailing Obama in popularity in his home state.

Michelle Bachmann won the Iowa straw poll back in late summer and then fared so poorly in the caucus in the very same state a few months later that she dropped out too.

And in the midst of all this shoot-yourself-in-the-foot trouble the Republican candidates have done to themselves, the economy is now improving just at the right time for Obama. The jobless rate is the lowest it's been except for one month since he took office and the stock market continues to rally.

Most people and this includes a lot of Republicans, have heard so much character assassination of the president that it's now bouncing off their skins instead of penetrating and some are just flat out tired of hearing it, preferring their candidates to run on the issues facing the country instead of the same old tired rhetoric the Party has been using against Obama ever since he threw his hat into the ring to run for President the first time.

A couple of years ago, conventional wisdom suggested that the Republicans could defeat Obama with practically anybody they chose to run.

Today that doesn't seem to be nearly as good a bet as it seemed back then.

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

The term "religious right" gets used when liberal thought doesn't work. Could you please define who the "religious right" is?

-- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Sat, Feb 11, 2012, at 6:01 AM

"Religious Right" is a Christian that believes Abortion is murder and will not support someone that is for Abortion.

Wallis Marsh

-- Posted by wallismarsh on Sat, Feb 11, 2012, at 7:30 PM

WOW! No wonder people are afraid of them.

-- Posted by Chunky Peanut Butter on Sun, Feb 12, 2012, at 3:47 PM


Let's not be Christian-centric. There are plenty of non-christian religions and/or sects that are against abortian. They get to be in the "religious right" as well. The pro-choice crowd are less comfortable picking on non-Christans.

-- Posted by Sir Didymus on Sun, Feb 12, 2012, at 5:33 PM

People say you shouldn't look a gift horse in the mouth. My question is, "Should you not look at the gift in the horse's mouth?"

-- Posted by bjo on Mon, Feb 13, 2012, at 11:09 AM

The religious right to me would be those that scream the loudest about religious freedom, as long is it is not a group of Muslims wanting to build a mosque.

-- Posted by hulapopper on Mon, Feb 13, 2012, at 7:38 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Mike Hendricks
Mike at Night