Next phase of walking trail on the horizon

Friday, September 16, 2011
Randy Andrews of McCook demonstrates the proper use of a piece of exercise equipment on the McCook Walking Trail in January 2009. City staff will ask for approval from the McCook City Council, Monday evening, to apply for grant assistance for the third phase of the walking trail; extending it southeast to East 11th Street. Photo: Lorri Sughroue

McCOOK, Nebraska -- City staff will present the McCook City Council with a grant application that requests assistance from the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Recreational Trails Program, for the third phase of the McCook walking trail. Approval to proceed with the grant request will be considered during their semi-monthly meeting, Monday evening, 7:30 p.m., at Memorial Auditorium.

The next phase of the walking trail will begin on East H Street and move in a southeast direction to East 11th Street. Total cost of the phase is estimated at $142,000 with 80 percent of that picked up by the grant. The city's 20 percent portion will be $28,400, which has already been budgeted for in the 2011-12 budget.

The collective bargaining agreement and a Memorandum of Understanding between the city and the McCook Police officers union will also be considered for approval.

Changes to the collective bargaining agreement have already been adopted into the 2011-12 budget and include:

* Police officers will no longer be required to maintain a separate professional license with the state as either an EMS provider, EMT or First Responder. The union has agreed to continue to respond to ambulance calls and be trained in CPR and basic first aid.

Specific language was added to clarify the role of a 32 hour per week employee.

"Field Training Officer" will be added to the list of employee duties that qualify for 5 percent premium pay, when actual field training is taking place.

The lodge will be allowed to use Police department facilities for its meetings.

Language will be included that sets the rate for health insurance premiums for the length of the contract.

An addendum that modifies the agreement between the city and the McCook Humane Society will be presented for approval. The addendum authorizes the $1,000 annual increase for the McCook Humane Society, which was approved during the Sept. 6, City Council meeting.

The annual increase was less than the $3,000 the McCook Humane Society had requested.

The request for an increase sparked comments from Mayor Dennis Berry that he would rather put the funds toward payroll increases for city employees. The recently approved 2011-12 Fiscal Year Employee Classification Pay Plan, which includes cost of living, merit and longevity increases, are calculated to result in approximately a 6.2 percent annual pay increase from prior year.

If approval for the addendum is granted, the cost to the City of McCook for the McCook Humane Society will be $44,000 for 2011-12. The North Platte animal shelter, which has a strict 3-day euthanasia policy, is budgeted to cost the City of North Platte $258,772 during that same time-period.

The third and final reading required for proposed water and sewer rate increases will be considered. The increases are projected to be an average of $14 annually on residential sewer bills and an average of $13 annually on residential water bills. The new rates will be effective Oct. 1, 2011, if they receive final approval during meeting.

The West Central Nebraska Area Agency on Aging has approved an increase to the eligible meal reimbursement for the McCook Heritage Senior Center. The increase is estimated to bring the reimbursement amount for congregate and home delivered meals to $65,541, which is an increase of $3,241.

Councilors will consider granting approval to modify the 2012 contract to allow for the increase.

Changes to the application for public transportation assistance will be considered for approval. The total cost to fund the McCook Public Transit System, for fiscal year 2011-12, is $106,610. The City of McCook will be responsible for $23,753 of that amount, which is a decrease from the prior years $25,452.

The public transit system is a Monday through Friday dial-a-ride system available to anyone, regardless of age, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., with a $1 fee for each one-way trip. For more information, or to make an appointment, call 308-345-6098.

Other items on the consent and regular agenda:

Council members will consider the third and final reading pertaining to the donation of a city owned lot to the McCook Economic Development Corp. The lot is located at the corner of East Second and C streets.

The McCook Library Foundation intends to gift property located at 806 Norris Avenue to the City of McCook. The gift is contingent upon the closing of a sale of the property between Paul L. Orvis, personal representative of the estate of Lawrence L. Orvis, and the McCook Library Foundation.

A progress report detailing the preliminary phasing plan for a project that focuses on improvements to East H Street will be presented to city council members for approval. The report focuses on details that will be distributed during an Oct. 10 public meeting at the Heritage Senior Center.

A change order that will increase the cost of the East O Street paving project by $7,500 will be considered. The change order was necessary to remove saturated soils that were discovered once asphalt was removed.

A resolution setting the property tax request for 2011-12 at a different amount than it was for prior year will be considered. It is the final step in the required budget process and follows a public hearing on the matter, which city staff coordinated in August. The levy amount will remain at the same $.319044, which is less than the $.45 maximum allowed levy for the city.

The McCook Chamber of Commerce has applied for a special liquor license for a mixer at Wagner Chevrolet on Oct. 19, 2011.

AmFirst Bank has requested to use portions of Kelley Park and the walking trail for a 5K cross country road race on Oct. 22, 2011.

United Way has requested to use city streets for their 11th annual United Way Fun Run and 5K Race on Sept. 24, 2011.

Sehnert's Bakery and Bieroc Cafe has requested a special liquor license for an Oct. 15 reception at the Keystone Business Center.

Comments
View 14 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • so is this 6.2% wage increase across the board? how can such an expense be true. I'd like to see some form of validation to this. it looks like that is across the board wages as the article is written. how cani get info on that?

    -- Posted by BTWinecleff on Sat, Sep 17, 2011, at 12:28 PM
    Response by Bruce Baker:
    SEE : City Council designates uncommitted sales taxes

    Sept. 9, 2011 story

    "Berry's comments reference the 2 percent wage increase to city employees, which references the 2 percent across the board cost of living adjustment that council approved for the 2011-12 employee pay plan. That number in itself drew some criticism because it was higher than 1.4 percent national consumer price index cost of living increase, prompting Kircher to casually suggest during an August city council meeting that reducing it to match the 1.4 would free up dollars to fund a Humane Society increase. With no support for the suggestion Kircher did not make an official motion.

    Berry's 2 percent wage increase reference also does not take into consideration longevity and merit increases. The two percent cost of living adjustment equated to $61,086 across all departments, merit increases came in even higher at $76,487 and longevity increases totaled $52,388. The actual increase in payroll, including cost of living, merit and longevity, calculates to approximately 6.2 percent annually."

    Numbers pulled from 2011-12 Fiscal Year City of McCook budget and confirmed with City Clerk, prior to story being published.

    Thanks for you interest and comments.

    Bruce Baker -City Editor

  • I too would like to see how that calculation was obtained.

    I certainly doubt that such a raise would be across the board, in fact I would suspect that IF that raise occurred it would be an isolated occurrence rather than the norm as it seems to be reported.

    Could the writer of this article please divulge his or her source as otherwise it might be construed as borderline libel according to the City Employees I've spoken to.

    Thank You for your cooperation on this. I just feel that the public should not be lead into a frenzy of falsehoods.

    -- Posted by PensiveObserver on Sat, Sep 17, 2011, at 4:40 PM
    Response by Bruce Baker:
    See response above.
  • I've been waiting to see if there is an answer to the source of information on this. It seems highly unlikely that an entity that must show publicly, its revenue and expenditures as well as divulge the same to auditors annually, would implement a 6.2% wage increase.

    I don't know as I have the backbone to go into the City offices and ask what the raises were this year. Some may argue that my tax money is paying their wages but I wouldn't care to tell my customers how much I make just because their money pays my wage.

    Does anyone know who wrote the article?

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Mon, Sep 19, 2011, at 11:38 PM
  • The City Clerk has said that the average increase in wages was 3.2% including the raise in cost of living, merit and years experience. The raises still puts City employees behind what many other cities are paying.

    -- Posted by dennis on Tue, Sep 20, 2011, at 10:26 AM
  • Soooo, where did the writer get 6.2%? And why was that figure presented? Stirring of the pot is what that looks like.

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Tue, Sep 20, 2011, at 12:52 PM
    Response by Bruce Baker:
    See response above.
  • Bruce,

    Thank you for the clarification. To be fair though, just because the CPL, longevity and merit is increased over the 2010-2011, does that represent an accurate figure? For example, if the number of employees increased during the 2011 - 2012 year over the previous year, the number of 2% CPL raises would increase skewing the total cost from one year to the next making a year to year comparison based solely on the bulk increase. Then again, if the employee ratio dropped, then the year to year increase would represent a lower raise rate than actually was given.

    Thank you for your response.

    Nick Mercy

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Wed, Sep 21, 2011, at 5:42 PM
  • Mr. Baker IS correct in that the line items in the budget for base salary, merit and experience increased nearly 6.2%. However the anticipated actualy expenditures will run about 3.2% on average. This is due to the fact that although budgetd for, not every employee gets merit and if they do they may not receive the maximum allowed under the scale. Also due to the fact that some employees with multiple years experience leave McCook for higher paying jobs in other communities and some employees retire, the actual experience payment --although budjected for--has been reduced. Thus the true average increase for employees is around 3.2%, not 6.2%

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Sep 22, 2011, at 8:12 AM
  • OK, Dennis, that creates a number of other questions. Are you saying that the city budgeted to give merit and longevity increases to every employee, but does not intend to spend that entire budgeted amount? Isn't that called padding the budget? I can see your point on moving away or taking other jobs (what is the turnover rate for full-time employees at the City - I would bet it is pretty low); but I can not see budgeting a merit or longevity increase for an employee that you have no intention of giving the increase to. Doesn't inflating the budget also inflate our property taxes and the rates that have to be charged for water, sewer and trash? Also, you said that they do not receive the maximum allowed under the scale. So what is the maximum allowed under the scale? If using Bruce's calculation the increase averages 6.2%; but not every employee is getting the increase, it looks to me like the ones who are could be receiving much more than 6.2% Don't get me wrong, I think we have great people at the city, but you need to clarify this issue for us. Thanks.

    -- Posted by farmguy on Thu, Sep 22, 2011, at 12:34 PM
  • How did the city clerk come up with the average increase of 3.2%? (This is after the Mayor stated that employees were ONLY getting a 2% increase.) It seems that if Bruce is asked to explain how he came up with 6.2 percent, which he did, the Mayor should be able to come up with an explanation of the 3.2%.

    -- Posted by farmguy on Thu, Sep 22, 2011, at 1:06 PM
  • Budgeting requires planning for the maximum amount that COULD be expended. Line items in most budgets are not the true amount that is expended. Dollars left in a line item can then be used to cover expenses that do run over the budget. The mill levy did not raise on property taxes again this year and has not raised since 2002. The city did receive approx. $8,000 in additional property taxes do to valuation increases--- like improvements on a home, a new building or garage. Water, sewer and trash are enterprise funds that are to be self funded (pay for themselves with dollars set aside for O and M). The 2% was stated to be base raises only. Merit and experience --as line items were not included in the base raise. Again Bruce is correct in the total raises on the line items were near 6.2% but the average raise actually being paid out is around the 3.2%. I admit it can be confusing. Bottom line is the comparison reports indicates Mcook employees are not on the top when looking at pay from other towns. The survey also shows McCook has a lower than average property tax rate than other Nebraska cities with over 5,000 population and and sewer and water/trash rates are in the ballpark with other towns also. I would like taxes and fees to be lower but life isn"t bad in McCook.

    -- Posted by dennis on Thu, Sep 22, 2011, at 3:58 PM
  • My employer adjusts my wage dependant on his view of my value. If I'm not holding up my end of the bargain, I don't get a raise. If I'm turning profit, I get compensated. If you aren't getting raises or your raises aren't at the 3% - 4%, ONE OF TWO THINGS MIGHT BE HAPPENING.... the employer is struggling, OR you might not be pulling your own weight.

    To expect the employees of any enterprise, be it private or public, to NOT be compensated for their efforts just because it's YOUR dollar that makes the wage, is crazy. We should be happy that we are paying a longevity increase. That indicates that we are retaining employees that are good at what they do and we are not paying for the training of new employees.

    Last year I received a 4.8% increase from my employer.... I'm not bragging but I am pleased on two accounts: I did my job well and was recognized for it, and my employer doesn't appear to be on the brink of bankruptcy! It was a good year for ole Nick. Are you affected by it? Quite possibly, as my employer may have taken your money last year and all costs effect prices. Then again, I may have paid more to your place of employment because YOU did such a great job. It would be nice to know that I'm getting premium product or service for my money. Keep doing a good job and I'll keep coming back and paying what it takes to obtain what you offer.... that's how it works.

    You either excel and are compensated for it or you decline and find yourself visiting the soup kitchen. Why would a City employee not deserve the same right as me to be compensated for their hard work?

    -- Posted by Nick Mercy on Thu, Sep 22, 2011, at 6:56 PM
  • Back for Heritage Days in my hometown. I went to a good Bison football game and as I left I seen two ambulances answering an emergency call and then a firetruck just across from Norris Park answering and emergency call with several policemen blocking the roads. Whatever these people are paid....just simply isn't enough. Quit complaining about the raises or possible raises and be thankful you have the professional services that you have.

    -- Posted by McCook Supporter on Fri, Sep 23, 2011, at 10:13 PM
  • i'm the type of guy that looks at the price tag on the garment and asks what you get along with the sandwich. why would I not want to know how much $ my city workers are costing me in taxes?

    -- Posted by BTWinecleff on Sat, Sep 24, 2011, at 7:14 PM
  • Winecleff, do you also ask the ER staff what their rate is while they put the electric paddles to your chest or do you let them do their job and just complain after you receive the bill?

    -- Posted by PensiveObserver on Tue, Sep 27, 2011, at 11:16 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: