[mccookgazette.com] Fair ~ 56°F  
High: 83°F ~ Low: 52°F
Thursday, May 5, 2016

Happy Granny

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Grannie Annie (she is everybody's Grannie Annie and she is my wife) had an epiphany today. Visiting with T.J. a National Guardsman recently returned from Afghanistan she asked if he had ever seen one of the ribbon crosses that she and her friends craft and send to her adopted Chaplains serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. T.J. told her that yes indeed he had seen them over there and how he had told his compatriots that he actually knew the lady that made them.

His response brought tears to her eyes and confirmed that all of her community efforts to send "care packages" to the troops were worth while. T.J. continued telling that he served at a bare bones forward operating base, no P.X., and the G.I.s really had a need for shampoo, soap and the other basic hygiene necessities that she and friends sent. He said our troops seem to receive a considerable amount of chewing gum and candy, a great portion of which they in turn share with the little Afghanistan children. It was the basic hygiene items that the G.I.'s needed but they greatly appreciated all the other goodies that people from home cared enough to send.

T.J.'s confirmation that sending a constant stream of boxes to her Adopt-A-Chaplain organization to distribute to the troops was well worth the community's effort. Grannie Annie has recently received communication from her new adopted Chaplain now serving in Eastern Afghanistan, no PX, and he confirmed a list of items that his GIs need. Chaplain Vineyard, the one that she recently served, has completed his year long tour of duty and he along with his unit have returned back home to Kentucky. And now a simple thank you from a soldier that has "been there and done that!" She now has renewed strength to double her efforts in the good work.

The recent debacle where we watched Congress fumbling around attempting to resolve a financial crisis was purely an American phenomenon. Actually the messy process was a good thing , designed into our form of government by those who wrote the U.S. Constitution. Those founders had lived under autocratic English rule and so created an intentionally weak federal government. The idea was to divide power among the president, the House of Representatives and the Senate, all of whom are elected to represent "we the people."

During the recent financial debacle it was the representatives sent to Congress by the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party who reared back and held firm against raising taxes. Unfortunately they tried hard but mostly failed at curbing excess spending. The end result was not much of a success for the true conservatives but it was a good start.

In Europe, then and now, decisions are made by an all powerful head of state and their legislative bodies then, most times, ratify that decision. The common people don't have much say in the matter and just have to put up with what comes down the pike.

In this country there has been a long time effort, since the 1930s, to strengthen the office of the presidency. President Roosevelt found that by distributing government money he could influence his constituency to vote to keep him in office. Members of Congress noted how good that system worked and shoveled pork for the same purpose and they too had great success over the years. Keynesian economics had great attraction for those in power because it was a way to shower down government money to those groups they favored in an attempt to "stimulate the economy". The Fed also jumped in by lowering the approved rate of interest on government bonds to near zero and what is that doing for your personal 401k retirement fund? The people in charge are about out of ideas and that brings to mind a quote attributed to Margaret Thatcher--"The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."

To illustrate the problem I picked up this treatise from the Internet. I know not the author and can't vouch for its accuracy but like the way it reads.

"The U.S. Congress sets a federal budget every year in the trillions of dollars. Few people know how much money that is so we created a breakdown of federal spending in simple terms. Let's put the 2011 federal budget into perspective:

U.S. income: $2,170,000,000,000

Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000

New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000

National debt: $14,271,000,000,000

Recent budget cut: $ 38,500,000,000 (about 1 percent of the budget)

It helps to think about these numbers in terms that we can relate to. Let's remove eight zeros from these numbers and pretend this is the household budget for the fictitious Jones family.

Total annual income for the Jones family: $21,700

Amount of money the Jones family spent: $38,200

Amount of new debt added to the credit card: $16,500

Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710

Amount cut from the budget: $385

So in effect, last month Congress, or in this example the Jones family, sat down at the kitchen table and agreed to cut $385 from its annual budget. What family would cut $385 of spending in order to solve $16,500 in deficit spending?

It is a start, although hardly a solution."

The real solution is to elect good men/women to high office that will abide by the Constitution and put our fiscal house in order. Our future depends on it!

That is the way I saw it.

Dick Trail

Fact Check
See inaccurate information in this story?

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on mccookgazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

cant wait for the liberal responses to this one. lol

-- Posted by doodle bug on Tue, Aug 16, 2011, at 12:58 PM

I can just ismagine how very happy that made Ann! Yeah for the TEA party for standing firm on the moneyline. I have no words for the SpendoCrats. Now we own two new $1.1 Mil busses to drag his campaign around the country. Fly AF #1 to destination, climb on my bus, and drive to some Spend-o-cratic get together, get back on the plane and head for vacation when leadership is required. Proves total lack of leadership! One term!!

-- Posted by TravRN on Tue, Aug 16, 2011, at 1:44 PM

I do pray that most of the readers can plainly see that the cited example, which is what the Fed is doing, only without so many zero's, is doomed to failure, as each year of more negative balance, requires a disproportionate amount of savings, paying off, to compensate, just to stay at the same position of inability to pay/float.

We, The People, can only have a chance of saving this nation, if we cut spending to half the expected income, and used the unused half to pay down the debt. Of course, none of our elected Official-dumb will do that, for fear of being elected-out of office, and we wouldn't want them to lose their cushy, highly paid, special rewards, powerful job, now, would we??

If, by chance, our Official-dumb managed to attain the backbone for Officialdom, We The People would need be sacrificial, and extremely supportive of the work needed to, hopefully, save our Nation. ...Rant.Over...

Ponder, Please, folks. Our Nation needs to find it's own level of buoyancy, supported only by the water of worthiness, not debt.

-- Posted by Navyblue on Tue, Aug 16, 2011, at 2:05 PM

doodle, I'll tell you, basically, what they'll say. "They'll" say that the argument presented above is far too simplistic just like our conservative minds. "They'll" say that the government is much larger and more complex than a family budget and to compare apples to apples is assinine. They'll say that people who wish to cut spending are obstructionists and that the whole reason the economy got going again was because of the stimulus. I am relating the gestalt of a blog I was following on the Lincoln Journal Star's website. If you like to hear what the "other side" has to say, they have about 6 regulars on there who talk a good game and think they have the "upper hand" over the dumb conservative-type posters.

-- Posted by speak-e-z on Tue, Aug 16, 2011, at 3:03 PM

I would just say, it would have been nice you you people had spoken up under a republican house, a repuclican senate, and a republican president. It seems that you have finally found your voice aginst the deficit. Better late then never I guess.

-- Posted by president obama on Tue, Aug 16, 2011, at 9:02 PM

Repeal Obamacare, reduce every government agency by a minimum of 30%, pass a balanced budget amendment, scrap the income tax for a flat 7% tax...then I would say we had a good start. What we have now is a perpetuation of insanity.

-- Posted by Mickel on Wed, Aug 17, 2011, at 6:52 PM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

Dick Trail
The Way I Saw It